Parenting

A wave of new research is reshaping what we know about fatherhood, suggesting that men’s brains undergo measurable, dynamic changes when they become parents—changes often echoing those long attributed to mothers. For Thai families watching the shifting roles of men in parenting and policymakers focused on child development, these findings open remarkable new windows into the neurobiology of caregiving and challenge prevailing cultural stereotypes.

Until recently, the concept of “mom brain” reigned supreme in popular culture and scientific study. Defined by both cognitive shifts and an emotional attunement toward a new child, much has been made about the brain and hormonal changes mothers experience. However, a growing body of work, including the latest research led by a US-based psychology professor at the University of Southern California, finds that becoming a father sparks a unique neurological and hormonal transformation—a phenomenon now being described as “dad brain” (wbur.org).

A wave of recent research is reshaping our understanding of fatherhood. Studies show that men’s brains can change in measurable, dynamic ways after becoming dads—changes that echo what has long been observed in mothers. For Thai families watching shifting parenting roles and for policymakers focused on child development, these findings reveal new insights into caregiving and challenge old stereotypes.

Historically, conversations about parenting often centered on “mom brain,” the idea that mothers undergo cognitive and emotional shifts after birth. Now, researchers from a leading US university report that fatherhood also triggers neurological and hormonal changes. The growing body of evidence suggests that dads engage in a biological process that supports caregiving, a development with broad implications for family life and public policy.

A growing concern among educators is that today’s university students may arrive on campus lacking essential life skills. In many cases, parenting styles that emphasize protection over autonomy are seen as a contributor to this trend. The discussion, sparked by an anonymous professor’s reflections in an advice column, resonates with Thai educators who are seeing similar patterns at home and in schools.

Experts note that overprotective, or “helicopter,” parenting can hinder a child’s development of autonomy and resilience. Students who expect step-by-step guidance and fear of discomfort can struggle with practical self-care and problem-solving in daily life and study. This shift affects classroom dynamics and raises questions about readiness for the workforce.

A growing number of university professors in the United States are raising alarms about a worrying trend among today’s students: many young adults are arriving at university without essential life skills, due to parenting styles that prioritize protection over independence. This issue, highlighted in a recent Slate advice column where an anonymous professor described students “who have never been allowed to solve a problem themselves,” is resonating with educators and mental health professionals worldwide, and holds crucial lessons for Thai parents and educators facing similar cultural shifts.

A wave of recent studies questions the assumption that more after-school activities always lead to better outcomes. New research suggests that excessive scheduling can harm children’s mental health and social development, especially when activities are pursued for parental or societal pressure rather than the child’s interest. This debate matters for Thai families and educators, where academics, sports, and arts are often viewed as essential steps toward success.

Around the world, parents face a familiar dilemma: should they nudge their child toward activities, even if the child resists? Many believe structured programs build skills academics alone cannot. Yet a 2024 study from the University of Georgia indicates that while moderate involvement can support cognitive and social growth, a heavy load yields diminishing returns and may harm emotional well-being. Researchers explain that the final hours of extra activities offer minimal cognitive gains and may negatively affect non-cognitive skills like resilience and self-regulation.

A growing body of research is challenging long-held beliefs about the value of pushing children into numerous extracurricular activities, with new studies warning that more is not always better — and that excessive scheduling may actually harm children’s mental health and social development. These findings, recently discussed in a widely read article from The Cut, have significant implications for parents and educators worldwide, including in Thailand, where academics, sports, and other out-of-class pursuits are often seen as essential paths to success.

A new JAMA study is reshaping how parents and educators view digital use among Thailand’s youth. The research emphasizes screen addiction—patterns of compulsive, uncontrolled technology use—over total hours spent online. It finds that addictive behaviors correlate more strongly with depression, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts than simply counting screen minutes.

As Thai children increasingly engage with social media, smartphones, and online games, the takeaway for families and schools is clear: ask why and how they use devices, not just how long. Research indicates that the quality and function of use matter more for mental wellbeing than quantity alone. This perspective aligns with broader concerns in Thailand where digital platforms are deeply embedded in daily life.

A groundbreaking new study published in JAMA has sparked a timely debate among parents and experts worldwide, including Thailand, about the real impact of screens on young people’s mental health. The findings point away from the traditional focus on daily screen time limits and instead urge caregivers to pay close attention to signs of screen addiction—compulsive, dependent behaviors associated with technology use—as these are much more strongly linked to depression, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts among children and adolescents.

A recent column by a retired psychotherapist in The Mercury News has reignited an ongoing debate on the efficacy of ‘gentle parenting’—an approach that emphasizes empathy and connection rather than punishment—particularly for parents struggling with toddlers who display aggressive behaviors such as hitting. The expert argues that while gentle parenting techniques prioritize the development of conscience, empathy, and emotional regulation, accumulating research now suggests these strategies may fall short when tackling persistent or physically aggressive misbehavior in young children. This timely question has global resonance and is particularly significant in Thailand, where parenting traditions, disciplinary norms, and family structures are rapidly changing.

As parents and educators across Thailand seek the best paths to help children succeed, new research highlights a surprising factor: teaching self-control from a young age may matter more than academic specialisation or an early career focus. This finding, gaining momentum in international debates about childhood success, shines a light on the cultural pressures Thai families face and offers a practical, research-backed approach for nurturing well-rounded citizens.

In today’s high-pressure education environment, many Thai families begin preparing their children’s academic portfolios before they’ve even entered primary school. Competition for spots at top universities like Chulalongkorn and Mahidol, concerns about globalisation, and an uncertain job market all contribute to a culture where children are encouraged to specialize early. As detailed in a recent Atlanta Journal-Constitution commentary, this international trend asks young learners to demonstrate passion and achievement in a specific field before they have had time to naturally explore their interests—often resulting in exhaustion and anxiety for both parents and children.

Telling small white lies to children — from claiming the tablet is “broken” to insisting ice cream trucks only play music when out of ice cream — is a parenting tactic familiar to many. While these fibs often seem harmless and sometimes feel like necessary tools for exhausted parents, new international research warns that such deception can carry significant unintended consequences for a child’s trust and honesty, even shaping their behavior well into adolescence and adulthood.

A recent commentary by a retired psychologist in The Mercury News has sparked fresh debate about whether gentle parenting is enough for toddlers who lash out. The piece argues that while empathy, emotional labeling, and non-punitive guidance are valuable, they may not quickly curb persistent or physical aggression in young children. The discussion has global relevance and resonates in Thailand, where changing family dynamics and evolving parenting norms are shaping how families respond to misbehavior.

A new study argues that teaching self-control from a young age may matter more than early career specialization. For Thai families navigating a high-pressure education system, this finding offers a practical, research-backed path to developing well-rounded citizens.

Thai parents and educators often feel pressure to build a standout academic portfolio early. Competition for spots at top universities, global market shifts, and uncertain job prospects contribute to a culture that prizes early specialization. As observed in a national commentary from an Atlanta newspaper, this trend asks children to demonstrate passion and achievement in a specific field long before they have a chance to explore their interests. The result can be fatigue and anxiety for both children and families.

Small white lies may feel convenient for tired parents, but new international research suggests they come with lasting costs to trust and honesty in children. The findings indicate that deceptive parenting can shape a child’s behavior into adolescence and beyond, undermining confidence in close relationships.

A major study led by researchers from a top Singapore university and a prominent education institute in Ontario confirms a global pattern: most parents report telling lies to influence emotions or behavior. More than nine in ten adults say they were lied to by a parent in childhood, and the majority of current parents admit to lying to their own children.

A viral claim suggests that children born in certain months—especially January, February, and March—are more likely to show higher intelligence. Yet the science behind these statements remains unsettled, and many headlines blur fact with speculation. This is a timely topic for Thai families and educators who want evidence-based guidance for nurturing young minds.

Thai audiences are highly attuned to educational outcomes. Schools, families, and policymakers continually seek ways to optimize learning. The question of birth months taps into broader discussions about school start ages, cognitive development, and how to support every child’s potential.

Are you smarter because of the month you were born? A newly trending wave of expert and pop-psychology opinion pieces claims that some birth months may be linked to higher intelligence—yet, beneath the headlines, the science remains far from settled. As discussions heat up online, Thai parents and educators are asking: can a child’s birth in January, February, or even the autumn, make a difference in their academic and intellectual prospects?

Recent attention has focused on the formative practices instilled in Japanese children, revealing cultural foundations that foster discipline, empathy, and a sense of community. Drawing from a recent article, “10 things Japanese children are taught in childhood” published by the Times of India (source), as well as supporting research and educational policy reviews, this report unpacks these quintessentially Japanese values, examines their impact, and explores lessons for Thai families and educators.

A recent exploration of Japanese childhood practices reveals a set of foundational habits that cultivate discipline, empathy, and community. Drawing on a Times of India feature about what Japanese children are taught, along with supporting research and policy reviews, this piece reframes these lessons for Thai audiences and educators.

Japan is renowned for social order, public respect, and strong educational outcomes. Beyond quiet trains and orderly queues, its core lessons begin in early childhood: emotional self-control, deep respect, patience, teamwork, environmental stewardship, and the ability to find joy in calm celebrations. For Thailand, which is balancing tradition with modernization in education, Japan’s holistic approach offers provocative ideas and practical steps.

A new study in the Journal of Psychology shows that how parents bond with their children can influence a young adult’s life satisfaction. The emotional pathways involved are anxiety and anger. Findings from an Italian university indicate that overprotective parenting can increase anxiety, while warm, caring parenting helps with anger control, ultimately affecting overall happiness in emerging adulthood. This research offers useful insights for Thai families, educators, and policymakers aiming to nurture resilient, well-adjusted youth.

New findings published in the Journal of Psychology reveal that the way parents bond with their children can influence a young adult’s life satisfaction, and that this impact often travels through two powerful emotions: anxiety and anger. The study, led by researchers at an Italian university, shows that overprotective parenting may inadvertently fuel anxiety, while warm, caring parenting seems to promote better anger control—both of which affect how satisfied emerging adults are with their lives. This research shines new light on age-old questions faced by Thai families and educators about how to nurture resilient, well-adjusted future generations (PsyPost).

A new study reveals that the emotional climate at home plays a key role in how young Thai adults judge their life satisfaction, with anxiety and anger acting as important bridges between childhood parenting and adulthood well-being. The research, summarized for a global audience by PsyPost, highlights the nuanced link between how parents care for their children, how they regulate emotions, and the happiness of individuals well into early adulthood.

A recent psychological study has unveiled new insights into how the emotional environment created by parents plays a pivotal role in shaping the overall life satisfaction of young adults, with anxiety and anger emerging as crucial mediators in this relationship. The findings—published in the respected Journal of Psychology and summarized by PsyPost—underscore the complex interplay between parenting approaches, children’s emotional regulation, and their subsequent well-being well into adulthood.

For Thai readers, who often place significant cultural emphasis on family harmony, respect, and parental involvement, this research offers a valuable perspective on how the varying degrees of care—or overprotection—during childhood can have long-lasting psychological consequences. The study echoes long-standing Buddhist principles about emotional balance while highlighting the importance of practical parenting choices that foster independent emotional regulation.

A new look at family dynamics challenges the old belief that more children automatically raise parental stress. Analysis of a 2013 TODAY Parents survey suggests that families with four or more children may experience lower stress, while those with three can feel overwhelmed. This insight is particularly timely for Thailand, where family structures are shifting under economic pressures and evolving social expectations.

Across Thailand, birth rates have fallen dramatically in recent decades, with small families becoming common. Yet many Thai households still navigate the tension between traditional expectations and modern realities. Data from national researchers shows the average Thai family now contains fewer children than in the past, while urban living and rising costs intensify parenting demands. The Thai context makes the study’s questions especially relevant: how many children truly ease or complicate parental life in today’s Thailand?

A new analysis of family dynamics and parental stress has upended common assumptions about the optimal number of children to raise, revealing that, counterintuitively, four may be the magic number for the least stressful parenting experience, according to a widely shared 2013 survey by TODAY Parents. This finding, echoed by research and commentary from mental health professionals, is especially relevant in Thailand, where changing family structures, economic pressures, and social expectations are reframing the debate on ideal family size.