A recent open letter to University of Ghana professor Ransford Gyampo has sparked global debates about how language shapes perceptions of mental health. Written by Nana Yaw Osei, Ph.D., the letter criticizes the use of the term “mad” to describe people with serious mental illnesses. This critique underscores a broader push to talk about mental health with dignity and accuracy in both public life and academic settings.
Dr. Osei argues that words like “mad” are not only insulting but also intellectually naïve and professionally inappropriate. The discussion reflects a growing consensus that language influences public attitudes and stigma toward mental health. In Thailand, as in many countries, careful terminology is essential to preserve the dignity of individuals living with mental health conditions.
Thailand, facing rising mental health concerns, must consider how framing conversations affects access to care. Language that trivializes severe conditions can deter people from seeking help. Whether in media, classrooms, or everyday conversations, terms should convey empathy and precision—avoiding stereotypes that hinder support.
Globally, economic and social pressures intersect with culture to shape mental health outcomes. In places like Ghana and Thailand, financial strain and cultural expectations can amplify stress. Careless language can magnify stigma, discouraging disclosure and treatment.
As conversations about mental health evolve, Thai educational campaigns and policy actions should prioritize mental health literacy. Clear, respectful language helps dismantle stereotypes, encourages constructive dialogue, and strengthens support systems for well-being.
While cultural differences exist, the aim remains universal: mental illness is a medical condition, not a personal failing. Adopting thoughtful language supports environments that foster recovery and aligns with Thai values of compassion and respect.
In discussions about sensitive topics, using neutral expressions such as “died by suicide” rather than “committed suicide” promotes a compassionate and accurate understanding of mental health struggles. This shift invites Thailand to reflect on and modernize its public narratives around mental health.
For policymakers and communities, a practical step is to prioritize mental health awareness and advocacy. Resources should focus on education, stigma reduction, and the promotion of terminology that is both precise and respectful. This approach benefits professional settings and everyday communication, empowering individuals with mental health challenges to lead fuller lives.