A new report from the World Health Organization (WHO) has revealed a staggering 33-year difference between the highest and lowest life expectancies globally, underscoring persistent and widening health inequities across nations and within societies. The findings, released on 6 May 2025, highlight that one’s health and longevity are shaped less by biology than by where one is born and raised, the opportunities available, and the degree to which social and economic structures expose individuals to disadvantage and discrimination (UN News).
For Thai readers, this news brings into sharp relief the urgent need to examine and address health disparities not only between Thailand and more developed nations but also among different communities within the Kingdom. As Thailand strives for both national progress and regional leadership in sustainable development, understanding the forces behind life expectancy gaps is critical to policy innovation, inclusive growth, and the promise of health equity.
According to the WHO analysis, people in countries with the highest average life expectancy can expect to live 33 years longer than those born in the lowest-ranked countries. The global agency emphasizes that these stark disparities are not limited to poor versus rich countries; inequality manifests within wealthy countries too, with marginalized or disadvantaged communities facing disproportionately lower life expectancy. WHO Director-General, speaking at the report release, highlighted, “Our world is an unequal one. Where we are born, grow, live, work and age significantly influences our health and well-being.” He further noted that health inequities are tightly linked to social disadvantage and discrimination, stating, “Health follows a social gradient whereby the more deprived the area in which people live, the lower their incomes are.” (UN News)
The WHO’s study, the first of its kind since the organization’s 2008 report on social determinants of health, included a review of progress towards targets for reducing life expectancy, child mortality, and maternal mortality disparities by 2040. Despite some advancements, the agency concluded that these goals are unlikely to be met unless nations take urgent, concerted action. The evidence, although incomplete in some regions due to data limitations, is clear: health inequities are often worsening. Children in poorer countries are 13 times more likely to die before the age of five compared with peers in high-income countries. Within low- and middle-income countries, nearly two million child deaths could be prevented annually by closing gaps between the poorest and wealthiest populations. While maternal mortality globally dropped by 40% between 2000 and 2023, a vast majority—94%—of maternal deaths remain concentrated in low or lower-middle income countries (UN News).
The Thai Ministry of Public Health has formerly acknowledged longstanding gaps in life expectancy across rural and urban areas, mountain and lowland provinces, and between majority and marginalized populations. While life expectancy in Thailand reached 78.7 years in 2022 for women and 71.2 years for men, significant disparities persist—ethnic minorities in Thai border regions, migrant workers, and stateless persons consistently face lower access to health services and higher mortality risks (World Bank Thailand Health Report). These domestic gaps mirror the global trend and present opportunities for targeted reforms, particularly as Thailand continues to expand its Universal Health Coverage and equity-focused social safety net programs.
International health experts point to multiple drivers of these gaps. Structural discrimination—against ethnic minorities, Indigenous Peoples, stateless populations, migrants, and those living in poverty—entrenches disadvantage from birth and throughout life. In many contexts, layers of marginalization create cumulative barriers to accessing food, clean water, quality education, and health care. As detailed in the WHO report and echoed by local Thai public health researchers, social determinants such as income, education, employment, environment, and political voice are as decisive as hospitals and medicines in shaping life-span (The Lancet, Social Determinants of Health).
Thailand’s ongoing commitment to universal healthcare—including the lauded “30 baht scheme”—is recognized as a model in the region, credited with improving nationwide health indicators and lifting millions out of extreme poverty. Yet, experts within Thailand’s leading health policy institutes have warned that the persistence of urban-rural gaps, resource shortfalls in district hospitals, and uneven quality of care remain formidable challenges. “We are proud of what universal coverage has achieved, but more must be done to reach high-risk and hard-to-reach groups,” stated a public health official at a leading Thai university hospital (WHO Thailand Country Cooperation Strategy).
The cultural and historical context in Thailand also plays a significant role in shaping health equity. Deep-rooted beliefs around fate, traditional medicine, hierarchy, and respect for authority both facilitate and complicate the rollout of top-down health interventions. While the Buddhist ethos of compassion underpins various community health initiatives, social stigma around poverty, disability, and mental health can contribute to invisible barriers to care and support.
The WHO’s latest appeal calls for comprehensive action: redoubling investment in social infrastructure, promoting universal public services, fighting economic inequality, and addressing structural discrimination, conflict, and forced migration. Thailand’s ongoing battle against non-communicable diseases, urban pollution, road traffic accidents, and an ageing population all intersect with the kingdom’s equity agenda. The Thai government’s draft Public Health Act seeks to address some of these challenges, but success will require stronger local engagement and mainstreaming equity into all policy domains (UN News).
Looking ahead, emerging data science tools, big data analysis, and the application of AI in monitoring health outcomes can sharpen the response and identify “hidden” pockets of disadvantage. Civil society networks, community health volunteers, and participatory research approaches pioneered by Thailand’s academic sector may serve as blueprints for other nations. Collaborative regional efforts under the ASEAN Health Cluster, with Thailand as a pivotal member, offer additional opportunities to share lessons and push for cross-border solutions—especially as labor migration, climate change, and disease outbreaks do not respect national boundaries.
For Thai readers, closing the life expectancy gap is not just about living longer, but about creating a fairer, safer, and more resilient nation. Policymakers must address not only access to hospitals and medicines but also early childhood nutrition, education equality, dignified employment, clean environments, and protection from violence and discrimination. Community leaders, educators, and health workers can help by advocating for marginalized groups and promoting inclusive, culturally sensitive care.
In practical terms, families and communities should remain active partners in health—participating in local health promotion events, making use of preventive screenings, and supporting vulnerable neighbours. Policymakers are urged to invest in data systems that disaggregate by gender, ethnicity, income, and geography so that “no one is left behind.” Thai society as a whole can benefit by viewing health equity not as a technical challenge for experts, but as a shared foundation for national prosperity, social harmony, and sustainable development.
Sources: