A new wave of scientific discussion has emerged following recent statements by a prominent biochemist regarding cardiovascular exercise—a topic of growing interest among health-conscious Thais. According to Dr. Rhonda Patrick, widely known for her research-based health communication, the fashionable “Zone 2” cardio workouts, popularised for their heart-health benefits, may not be enough if enhancing overall fitness and longevity is the goal. Instead, she urges the integration of higher intensity training to efficiently boost VO2 max, a critical measure of cardiorespiratory health (Men’s Fitness; Daily Healthways; Pure Vitality Echo).
Zone 2 cardio refers to moderate exercise performed at approximately 60–70% of one’s maximum heart rate, typically where conversation remains possible but with a noticeable elevation in breathing. This training zone is praised for enhancing fat metabolism, mitochondrial function, and overall endurance, prompting its enthusiastic adoption in Thailand’s urban parks, gyms, and among the cycling and running community. However, Dr. Patrick’s recent interviews and summaries of scientific literature spotlight a growing consensus: While Zone 2 has undeniable merits for metabolic health and stamina, it may leave a gap when it comes to optimising the upper limits of cardiovascular fitness—known as VO2 max (Men’s Fitness).
VO2 max, or maximal oxygen uptake, is regarded as a strong predictor of longevity and resilience to chronic disease. Data from large cohort studies indicate that higher VO2 max correlates with reduced incidence of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and certain cancers (PubMed). Dr. Patrick, referencing this evidence, explains that improving VO2 max requires individuals to occasionally push into more vigorous exercise intensities—such as interval training or Zone 5 efforts—well above the typical Zone 2, where speech is possible in short phrases at best (Pure Vitality Echo).
This debate matters for Thai readers because exercise science is rarely straightforward, and blanket fitness recommendations risk missing nuances that could enhance public health. Thailand’s Ministry of Public Health, echoing World Health Organization guidelines, encourages at least 150 minutes of moderate aerobic activity or 75 minutes of vigorous exercise per week for adults (WHO). But among fitness enthusiasts—especially competitive cyclists, marathoners, and youth athletes—the quest for optimal routines is driving a deeper interest in the research underpinning different exercise zones.
The key distinction, as outlined by Dr. Patrick and echoed by sports scientists, lies in the biology of adaptation. While Zone 2 promotes metabolic resilience and mitochondrial density, only high-intensity workouts—interval running, cycling sprints, or HIIT (High-Intensity Interval Training)—generate the stress needed to prompt significant increases in maximal oxygen consumption. Dr. Patrick recommends a 50/50 mix of moderate and intense cardio for those seeking the greatest health and fitness return, a departure from the previous “80/20” advice (80% low-mod, 20% high-intensity) championed by other experts like Dr. Peter Attia (Reddit summary).
“Increasing VO2 max requires vigorous training that challenges the heart and muscles to adapt beyond their comfort zone,” Dr. Patrick emphasised during a recent podcast appearance, explaining that the physiological demand stimulates robust mitochondrial and cardiovascular growth (Daily Healthways).
Supporting this perspective, recent research published in peer-reviewed sports physiology journals demonstrates that while Zone 2 training elevates endurance and is safe for most adults—including seniors and those with certain medical conditions—VO2 max improvements plateau unless higher intensities are incorporated. A 2023 review in the Journal of Applied Physiology found that adults integrating interval sprints or tempo runs boosted their VO2 max by up to 15% over 10–12 weeks, compared to only marginal gains for those doing moderate cardio alone (Journal of Applied Physiology).
Thai fitness professionals and hospital-based exercise physiologists have also begun to adjust their recommendations. One senior cardiac rehabilitation specialist at a leading Bangkok hospital notes, “For patients without cardiac risk or hypertension, mixing in short bursts of vigorous activity after a foundation of base cardio creates the best outcomes—improving heart capacity and metabolic health. It’s important people are properly screened, but the science is supportive.”
Thai running, cycling, and triathlon clubs are also responding to these insights. Event organisers for the Bangkok Marathon and Chiang Mai’s annual cycling festival have started including “interval training clinics” led by certified coaches, helping participants understand and practically apply intensity-based training.
Yet, history and cultural context in Thailand reveal why Zone 2 cardio initially gained such devoted followers. Traditionally, walking, cycling, and easy jogging have fit comfortably into the rhythm of daily Thai life, particularly in urban parks and university campuses. These habits align closely with Buddhist philosophies of moderation and sustainability—concepts that also underpin public campaigns like “เดินวันละ 10,000 ก้าว” (Walk 10,000 Steps a Day). The gradual transition toward more structured, science-based training is thus occurring alongside, rather than in replacement of, these deeply rooted practices.
As fitness apps and wearable devices become commonplace among Thailand’s middle and upper classes, more individuals now track heart rate zones, duration, and recovery data. This offers new possibilities for tailoring routines and monitoring progress, but also raises potential for confusion. As Dr. Patrick and other experts warn, the right balance of training intensity must be individualised. Factors such as age, baseline fitness, underlying health conditions, and personal goals should be assessed by certified trainers or medical professionals before dramatic changes are undertaken.
Looking forward, the Thai public is poised for a more nuanced approach to cardio fitness. As health educators and community leaders promote public exercise, the next step will involve clearer guidelines on when and how to balance moderate and vigorous sessions for maximum benefit. Emerging research also hints at genetic differences that may shape individual responses to exercise intensity, pointing to a future of even more personalised recommendations (PubMed - VO2 max genetics).
In light of these findings, Thai readers should reflect on their exercise habits and consider consulting with healthcare providers or certified trainers about integrating higher intensity intervals—provided it’s safe to do so. For most healthy adults, mixing brisk walking or cycling (Zone 2) with brief but challenging intervals (e.g., fast jogging, hill sprints) a few times per week offers the prospect of greater heart and lung health, improved functional capacity, and longer life.
For those beginning their fitness journey or managing chronic health issues, Zone 2 remains valuable. But for those looking to take their health to the next level, science now points toward the benefits of occasionally stepping outside their comfort zone—both literally and figuratively.
Sources: