The United Nations has sounded the alarm on an “unprecedented” worldwide decline in fertility rates, with profound consequences already shaping the future of nations like Thailand. The latest United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) report signals a tipping point: hundreds of millions of people worldwide are having fewer children than they would like, often citing rising financial pressures and shifting social dynamics as key barriers. For Thailand—a country at the heart of regional demographic shifts—the findings carry urgent weight, offering both fresh validation of local experiences and serving as a catalyst for renewed policy action.
At the core of this announcement is the UNFPA’s recent cross-country survey, which polled 14,000 people across 14 countries—including Thailand—covering a mix of economic tiers and differing fertility patterns. According to the report, nearly 20% of respondents indicated they have not had, or do not expect to have, the number of children they desire. The most-cited obstacles are not rooted in biology or health but in economics: 39% of respondents blamed prohibitive financial limitations, with responses varying from 58% in South Korea (the highest) to just 19% in Sweden. For many, like a pharmaceutical worker in Mumbai featured in the BBC story, the cost of parenting—including school fees, transportation, extracurriculars, and healthcare—overwhelms family aspirations.
This is not a matter restricted to affluent or rapidly developing societies. Thailand’s own trajectory shows how quickly demographic fortunes can change. Once concerned about overpopulation, Thai policymakers now face a dramatic population contraction: the country’s total fertility rate has plummeted from 6 children per woman in the 1970s to an estimated 1.08 as of 2022, far below the replacement rate of 2.1 (UNFPA Thailand ICPD30 report). Government figures warn that if the trend persists unabated, the nation’s population could fall from 66 million to just 33 million over the next six decades. The workforce is already shrinking, with the working-age population projected to plummet from 46 million to 14 million, while the elderly population (over 65) is set to more than double, exacerbating pressures on social systems and the economy.
The UNFPA report and associated commentary argue that the true global “fertility crisis” is not one of too many or too few children, but a mounting disconnect between people’s family desires and their ability to realize them. “Most people surveyed want two or more children,” said the UNFPA executive director, adding, “Fertility rates are falling in large part because many feel unable to create the families they want. And that is the real crisis.” The agency’s approach is a marked departure from past population control rhetoric, instead emphasizing reproductive autonomy and well-being amid modern socioeconomic challenges.
Recent Thai government analyses affirm the UN’s global findings while drawing attention to uniquely local factors. According to the Ministry of Public Health, Thailand’s sharp fertility decline is directly tied to the country’s long-running family planning campaign, which successfully encouraged smaller families beginning in the 1970s and 1980s. That achievement, however, is now compounded by more complex influences: urban living costs, the high price of childcare and education, ambitious career aspirations—particularly for women—and changing social attitudes toward marriage and parenthood. As one official from the Department of Health summarized in the ICPD30 report, “Living as a couple and having children is no longer the primary objective of women’s lives, as it was in the past.” (UNFPA Thailand ICPD30)
Importantly, Thailand’s demographic transformation is part of a much broader Asian trend. Formerly high-fertility societies across the region—from China and Japan to South Korea and Turkey—now see governments grappling with the dual specters of aging populations and workforce decline. In all cases, the challenge is not simply biological but systemic: economic insecurity, gender inequality, lack of affordable childcare, work-life imbalance, and persistent social expectations combine to suppress family formation.
Underscoring the urgency, the new UNFPA survey revealed that in Thailand, infertility or the inability to conceive was cited as a barrier by 19% of respondents—significantly above the global average of 12%. Yet financial cost and lack of time remain the dominant themes, with many Thai families reporting that the cumulative pressures of urban living and work schedules—inspired and reinforced by global trends—make the realities of parenting daunting. One respondent described the exhaustion and guilt from long work hours and commutes, saying, “After a working day, obviously you have that guilt, being a mom, that you’re not spending enough time with your kid. So, we’re just going to focus on one.”
For policymakers, these findings point to the need for comprehensive, well-coordinated interventions spanning multiple sectors. Thailand’s current response is based on what officials call a “life-cycle approach,” which aims to support individuals at every stage of life: investing in maternal health, reproductive rights, education, employment, and, increasingly, eldercare. Recent policy debates have focused on enhancing state subsidies for families with children, expanding early education, incentivizing parental leave, and ensuring affordable access to fertility treatments—especially for those facing biological infertility (see UNFPA World Population Day 2024).
Yet experts caution against simplistic or reactive moves. “We want to try as far as possible to avoid… panicky policies,” warned a demographer from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, emphasizing that attempts to micromanage population size—whether by restricting or compelling births—can easily drive regressive outcomes, such as xenophobia or infringement on women’s rights.
Instead, many recommend an integrative, data-driven approach anchored in human rights and inclusion. “A life-cycle approach must be incorporated into population policies,” says a leading academic at Chulalongkorn University’s College of Population Studies. This means aligning health, education, labor, and social welfare systems for every generation and ensuring that vulnerable populations, such as the disabled, people living in remote areas, and ethnic minorities, are not left behind.
Thailand’s recent policy innovations reflect these insights. The Ministry of Social Development and Human Security’s “5x5 Policy: Overcoming the Population Crisis” prioritizes inclusive economic policies and community engagement. Initiatives target not only boosting birth rates, but also reducing inequality, supporting gender equality, and modernizing data infrastructure to better understand demographic change (UNFPA summary). Thai Health Promotion Foundation and other community groups are now championing grassroots “community-led approaches,” underscoring that sustainable population health requires local as well as national actions.
Measuring the effectiveness of these interventions will require patience and robust analytics. Digital census-taking, targeted support for marginalised groups, workplace policy reform, and education around gender equality are all being closely watched for their impact—as are experiments with fertility support schemes in nations such as Singapore and South Korea, which face similar challenges.
But the wider cultural context should not be underestimated. In Thailand, as in many parts of East and Southeast Asia, deep-rooted social norms around family, parenthood, and gender roles continue to shape aspirations and choices. While the passage of marriage equality legislation marks a significant milestone for inclusiveness, the ICPD30 conference and UNFPA reports highlight the persistence of both subtle and overt cultural obstacles—whether patriarchal expectations, resistance to women’s workforce participation, or discrimination against single parents.
The lesson is clear: simply offering economic or medical incentives is unlikely to reverse fertility decline unless coupled with broader social transformation. This includes advancing gender equality, securing quality jobs for youth, reducing work-life stress, making childbearing compatible with women’s aspirations, and actively dismantling stigma around less conventional family forms.
The consequences of inaction are already visible. Without intervention, Thailand faces what demographers call a “demographic time bomb”: a fast-growing elderly population supported by ever-fewer working-age people, with major implications for the social safety net, pension funds, health care, and education systems. The specter of increased isolation, loneliness, and economic insecurity looms large for Thai elders, especially those with limited family support—as documented in public discussions and documentaries such as “Living Alone in Later Life,” produced as part of the ICPD30 launch (see summary).
Yet there are important opportunities within these challenges. Thailand, like many middle-income countries, can build on its notable achievements in reproductive health, universal health coverage, and gender equity. Experts consistently recommend upskilling the older workforce, supporting flexible labor policies, fostering social innovation, and creating “silver economy” initiatives to maintain economic vitality even as the median age rises (UNFPA State of World Population Report 2024). Digital inclusion and access to lifelong learning are likewise crucial for a future where multigenerational families and individuals of all backgrounds can thrive.
Looking ahead, the policy path is clear: the most effective responses to fertility decline are those that invest in people’s ability to choose, to participate, and to prosper—regardless of demographic circumstances. As the ICPD vision reminds, “placing people’s rights, dignity, and well-being at the heart of sustainable development” is not just a matter of justice, but a necessity for economic and social resilience. Thailand’s “inclusive, life-cycle” approach offers a model, but requires ongoing political will, robust data, and cross-sector collaboration to succeed.
For Thai readers, the call to action is practical and urgent: get informed about your reproductive and family planning rights, support community-led initiatives helping the elderly and young, demand gender-balanced policies in your workplace and government, and participate in civic life to ensure future policies reflect your needs and aspirations. For families considering their own futures, take advantage of available support services and stay engaged in policy discussion—because the story of Thailand’s demographic future is still being written.
Sources: