A groundbreaking new study reveals that individuals with higher intelligence are not only better at academic tests but are also significantly more accurate at predicting their own futures, offering critical insights for personal and societal decision-making. This finding, based on nearly two decades of data from over 3,900 older adults in England, is stirring debate about how Thai people and policymakers might approach health, financial planning, and education in a world of increasing uncertainty ZME Science.
At the heart of this research, led by a professor from the University of Bath’s School of Management, is a deceptively simple question: Can people accurately predict their own lifespan? Participants of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) were repeatedly asked about their likelihood of reaching a certain age, such as 75 years old, and their responses were rigorously compared to official actuarial data from the UK Office for National Statistics. The results were clear: those with higher IQs provided more realistic estimates, while lower-IQ individuals’ forecasts were generally further from the mark—sometimes twice as erroneous.
For Thai readers, this study isn’t just scientific trivia; it goes to the core of daily life. In Thailand, as in many countries, individuals make countless future-focused decisions: saving for retirement, planning healthcare, or choosing new career paths. Each of these depends on accurately assessing the likelihood of various outcomes. If intelligence plays a significant role in this process, the ways educational institutions and public agencies present information could profoundly influence everyone—especially those more prone to forecasting errors.
The research demonstrates that higher-IQ individuals are better at making objective probabilistic assessments of their personal future, not simply due to optimism or pessimism, but because of enhanced cognitive ability to reduce judgmental noise and avoid miscalibrated expectations. For example, a 65-year-old predicting a 70% chance of living to age 80 could compare this directly with the actual statistical probability for someone of similar demographic factors. Higher cognitive ability led to predictions with smaller errors, while the lowest-IQ participants had error rates more than double that of their highest-IQ peers.
What makes this study unique is its use of genetic data to explore the roots of superior forecasting. The researchers employed polygenic scores—essentially a fingerprint of cognitive potential derived from thousands of DNA variations linked to mental ability. Utilizing a method called Mendelian randomization, they established that elevated intelligence is not just associated with improved forecasting, but likely causes it. In practical terms, a 15-point boost in IQ (equal to one standard deviation on the classic scale) reduced prediction errors by nearly 20%. High-IQ individuals were also more consistent over multiple years, showing both accuracy and stability in their future-oriented judgments.
An expert summarised the implications, saying, “Accurately assessing the probability of good and bad things happening to us is central to good decision-making. Almost all decisions we make—whether it’s starting a business, investing, crossing the road, or choosing who to date—require probabilistic assessments.” This resonates strongly in a Thai context, where personal and business planning often relies on assessing uncertainty, whether facing rapid economic changes, evolving public health risks, or choices about education and career.
Furthermore, the study’s findings echo previous research showing that IQ predicts better life outcomes in areas such as health, wealth, and job success. The mechanism, the study suggests, lies at least in part in our ability to forecast realistically. For Thailand, where the education system faces pressure to develop “21st-century skills,” these results suggest that building cognitive capacity and fostering analytical thinking could have widespread benefits for the nation’s workforce and broader society.
However, the research also raises tough questions about inequality. If some people are genetically predisposed to make better decisions due to sharper forecasting abilities, what can or should society do to support those who are more vulnerable to misjudging the future? Thailand, with its diverse population and significant urban-rural educational divides, might consider these findings when designing public health campaigns, retirement fund advisories, or vocational retraining programs.
One practical solution suggested by the study’s authors is to change how information is communicated. Rather than expecting every citizen to perform complex probability calculations, public messages—whether about disease risk, investment, or educational opportunities—could explicitly state probability estimates, making it easier for everyone, regardless of cognitive ability, to make sound decisions. This is particularly relevant as Thailand’s population ages and more people must plan for uncertain health and financial outcomes. For instance, explicit summaries of breast or prostate cancer risk, or economic forecasts for future job markets, may help families nationwide plan more effectively.
The study’s insights are also resonant with Thai cultural philosophy: the notion of “plong” (ปล่อย) or acceptance of uncertainty in life. Traditionally, many Thai people embrace coping strategies such as mindfulness and community support in the face of unpredictability. However, modern Thai society is increasingly shaped by the need for specific planning—be it buying insurance, investing in tuk-tuks for family businesses, or sending children to special science programs. Here, a blend of cognitive development, clear public communication, and traditional acceptance might be the best way forward.
Looking to the future, the implications for Thailand are broad and deep. Education reformers might focus more on teaching probabilistic reasoning in both basic and higher education. Policy-makers could craft clearer, data-driven information campaigns on health and finance. Community organizations might adapt training programs to improve members’ ability to estimate and manage risk. In business and tourism, understanding the power of cognitive ability in forecasting demand could improve both competitiveness and resilience.
For ordinary Thai readers, this research offers practical insights. While cognitive ability has a genetic component, everyone can improve their forecasting to some extent by seeking quality information, avoiding overconfidence, and learning basic statistics. Parents and teachers can foster analytical thinking and curiosity in students, helping cultivate a new generation who are both wise and adaptable. Where possible, individuals should look for clear, probability-based advice on critical life choices—whether that means seeking out accurate health information before deciding on a treatment, or comparing official projections when planning finances for monkhood or retirement.
Ultimately, while everyone faces uncertainty, this study suggests that enhancing intelligence—whether through formal education or lifelong learning—can help each person navigate the future more clearly. For Thai society, where change is constant and planning is crucial, a national focus on clear information, cognitive growth, and careful decision-making could help every citizen build a brighter, more predictable future.
Sources: