A groundbreaking new study published in Science Advances has upended the commonly held belief that the sex of a baby is purely a matter of chance, revealing that birth sex patterns within families may follow unique, weighted probabilities. This research—based on more than 146,000 pregnancies from over 58,000 women across nearly six decades—suggests that some families have a higher likelihood of producing multiple children of the same sex, offering fresh insight into age-old questions about why some parents end up with, for instance, “all girls” or “all boys” (Washington Post).
At the heart of the study is a striking conclusion: the odds of having a boy or a girl in a family can be likened to flipping a weighted coin rather than a fair one—where some coins are “heavier” on one side for reasons that may be rooted in both genes and maternal age. Prior to this research, it was a near-universal cultural narrative that the odds for each pregnancy were always 50-50, but the new findings challenge this assumption, reshaping our understanding of human reproduction and sparking conversation on a topic deeply woven into family stories across the globe, including Thailand.
The topic resonates strongly here, given how personal, social, and even economic implications are attached to the birth of boys versus girls in Thai society. Traditionally, many families have placed importance on having both sons and daughters, and there are enduring beliefs about the value of birth order and gender. The new evidence is especially significant for Thai parents anticipating the arrival of another child: if a family already has multiple children of the same sex, their chances of having the same sex again are higher than previously thought.
Researchers at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health spearheaded the analysis, focusing on birth records from the US Nurses’ Health Study, comprising pregnancies from 1956 to 2015. What they found was that, statistically, mothers with three or more children were significantly more likely to have children of the same sex than what random chance would predict. Specifically, for families with three girls, there was a 58% chance of the next child being a girl, while for families with three boys, the chance of a fourth boy was 61%. This bubble of probability has implications for family planning and the way Thai parents might consider the chances of welcoming a much-desired boy or girl (Science Advances).
A key biological influencer identified was maternal age. Women who began childbearing after age 28 showed a modest increase in the likelihood of having only boys or only girls, which may be explained by biological changes associated with reproductive aging. Notably, the study suggested that changes in the vaginal environment—such as increased acidity—could reduce the survival of the Y chromosome, which determines male sex. This is consistent with prior research indicating that a mother’s body chemistry, nutrition, and even exposure to certain environmental factors might skew the chances of a boy or girl, themes that have anecdotal analogues in traditional Thai wisdom and folk beliefs.
However, the study also came with caveats. Paternal factors were not fully accounted for, as the database lacked detailed information on fathers’ ages and genetics. Additionally, almost all participants were White American nurses, an occupational group with possible differences in health and exposures compared to the general population, or to families in Thailand. This calls for caution when globalising the results and highlights the opportunity for Thai researchers to pursue similar studies using local data, particularly addressing cultural, genetic, and environmental influences unique to Thailand.
Of particular interest were genetic factors. The team identified two genes associated with the tendency for families to have only boys or only girls, although the mechanisms remain unclear. This opens up new scientific inquiries, but experts urge caution: as a professor of genetics at the Perelman School of Medicine (University of Pennsylvania) noted, the genetic sample size was small, and further research is needed before firm conclusions can be drawn.
The study’s methodology took family planning habits into account. It was observed that some families appear to stop having children once they’ve had both a son and a daughter, introducing a statistical anomaly. To mitigate this, researchers removed data concerning each family’s final child and excluded pregnancies involving miscarriages or stillbirths. Even with these adjustments, the pattern persisted: birth sex within families was not random.
For Thai readers, these findings may reframe classic family stories—tales of “five sons in a row” or “four daughters, no sons”—as statistically probable outcomes rather than outliers. Historical anecdotes abound in East and Southeast Asia of rulers desperate for male heirs, a phenomenon not unlike the case cited in the study of France’s King Louis VII, who sought to remarry after failing to have a son. In popular Thai culture, the quest for a “balance” of boys and girls can be seen in everything from family rituals to baby-naming ceremonies.
Experts emphasise that while the findings are robust, there remain unanswered questions about what precise genetic and environmental factors contribute to these probabilistic leanings. The senior author of the study, a professor of nutrition and epidemiology at Harvard, commented, “If you’ve had two girls or three girls and you’re trying for a boy, you should know your odds are not 50-50. You’re more likely than not to have another girl.” This perspective may influence Thai parents’ expectations and decision-making, particularly in multigenerational households where the birth of a child carries extra symbolic importance.
The implications for Thailand are multifaceted. For public health and family advisory services, this information offers a more nuanced framework for counseling couples about their expectations and hopes. For demographers and policymakers, the research may prompt further inquiry into regional variations in birth sex ratios, which in Thailand historically have shown a slightly higher number of male births but are generally close to the global average of about 105 boys for every 100 girls. The study also found that other commonly discussed factors, such as race, natural hair color, blood type, body mass index, and height, did not correlate with the probability of having all boys or all girls.
For Thai parents thinking about growing their families, or those seeking to balance their home dynamic, this research offers both reassurance and a gentle warning: while family tradition might wish for a “little brother” or “little sister,” biology may have its own, less random plan. On a practical level, the findings may also help reduce feelings of guilt or self-blame that some parents experience, feeling responsible for the “mix” of boys and girls—a narrative sometimes encountered in Thai society.
Looking ahead, researchers are calling for more investigations into how lifestyle, nutrition, and environmental exposures may further influence birth sex probabilities. This could be especially relevant in Thailand, where dietary habits, pollution levels, and occupational exposures are unique and can offer valuable contributions to the global dialogue on the subject. Institutions such as Thailand’s Department of Health and leading universities like Mahidol may consider similar longitudinal studies, including diverse ethnicities and broader occupational backgrounds.
In real-world terms, Thai families can use this knowledge to approach family planning with a new understanding: previous births are more predictive than once believed, but there is always a degree of uncertainty, and biology is ultimately complex. The takeaway: enjoy your expanding family, regardless of its gender configuration, and be mindful that what feels like fate is, in part, a dance between genetics, age, and a host of factors science is only now beginning to unlock.
For those wishing to learn more or to support future research, consider following updates from the Thai Ministry of Public Health or national academic journals, and share personal stories and questions with healthcare providers. By staying informed and open to new scientific insights, Thai families can make empowered, compassionate choices that honour both tradition and the evolving understanding of human biology.
Sources: