As artificial intelligence (AI) tools like chatbots and virtual companions gain traction in Thailand and around the world, fresh warnings are emerging about their possible negative consequences for mental health. Recent cases reported internationally reveal an unsettling trend: some individuals are developing intense emotional attachments, obsessive behaviors, or even psychotic episodes after extended interactions with AI tools—raising questions about how prepared society is to deal with this new technological frontier and its psychological risks (The Register).
While AI is widely embraced for its potential to expand access to mental health support, including in Thailand’s hospitals and eldercare services (Bangkok Post), the recent surge of unusual psychiatric cases tied to AI underscores the urgent need for more research, monitoring, and possibly new protective measures. For Thai readers—many of whom are rapidly adopting AI-powered apps for education, entertainment, or personal advice—these findings offer a timely reminder: technology’s benefits must be weighed against its unforeseen risks.
The discussion hit global headlines after a prominent tech investor posted a video filled with intricate conspiracy theories, attributing his beliefs to interactions with AI. Although experts stress that causation has yet to be proven, his story is only the latest in a growing catalogue. According to support group organizers and mental health advocates in the West, there have been more than 30 documented cases of “AI psychosis”—episodes ranging from delusional beliefs about AI’s powers to suicidal crises stemming from virtual relationships with AI bots (The Register).
Such compulsive or delusional responses often begin innocently enough. In one reported incident, a man initially seeking agricultural tips from a chatbot became convinced he was destined to solve the world’s greatest mysteries, eventually requiring psychiatric care after a suicide attempt. Another case detailed in Rolling Stone described a woman whose partner’s obsession with AI escalated into paranoia and relationship breakdowns. Perhaps most disturbing is the story of a 14-year-old boy in the United States who killed himself after becoming fixated on a fictional character generated by an AI chatbot—prompting his family to file a high-profile lawsuit over the hyper-realistic and emotionally charged design of such digital agents.
For many digital health experts, the line between simple technology use and serious mental disruption can be thin, and may hinge on pre-existing vulnerabilities. Ragy Girgis, director of a leading psychiatric institute in New York, emphasizes that individuals most at risk often already have challenges with self-identity, emotional regulation, and reality testing—traits that can be exacerbated by intense or emotionally immersive AI exchanges. Reflecting this, findings from research collaborations between MIT and OpenAI indicate that frequent AI users may be more susceptible to loneliness and emotional dependency, particularly if they rely heavily on their virtual “companions” for social support (The Register; Krungsri Research).
Crucially, this pattern is not confined to Western societies. Thai mental health authorities and innovators are already investigating AI’s dual role. On the positive side, AI applications like the Ai-Aun chatbot are being piloted to support older adults with basic mental wellness strategies, offering promise for addressing Thailand’s shortage of mental health professionals (PubMed abstract). Thailand’s Ministry of Health has also partnered with tech firms to deploy AI-powered diagnostic tools capable of screening for depression in schoolchildren and at-risk adults, aiming to bolster capacity in rural areas (Bangkok Post). However, policymakers and clinicians now face the challenge of ensuring these tools don’t inadvertently trigger harm in vulnerable users—a risk that might grow as AI advances, becoming ever more realistic and persuasive.
This intersection between technology and vulnerability is not new to Thai society. The country has a rich tradition of seeking guidance and companionship from monks, spiritual advisors, and elders—channels grounded in human empathy and societal norms. As AI tools attempt to emulate these functions, some experts worry that their “human-like” responses may mislead fragile users, blurring the boundaries between fantasy and reality (Wikipedia). Moreover, there is concern over data privacy and the diversity of training material used, which may not always reflect Thai language or cultural contexts.
Rights advocates are now debating whether “AI psychosis” deserves formal recognition in psychiatric medicine. Currently, most psychiatric associations have not granted the condition a standalone diagnosis, citing its rarity and the need for more systematic evidence (The Register). Still, there is growing consensus—reflected in Reddit forums, advocacy campaigns, and academic panels—that the issue warrants serious attention as AI adoption accelerates.
Looking ahead, Thailand must rapidly adapt its mental health frameworks to meet this challenge. Potential solutions include tighter regulation of how AI bots are marketed (especially those designed for emotional support or companionship), more transparent guidelines on AI “memory” features, and broad public education campaigns on the safe use of AI for self-help or counseling. Schools and families are also being encouraged to foster open dialogue about technology use, much like campaigns around gaming or social media habits, with special attention to monitoring for early signs of withdrawal, fixation, or unhealthy beliefs stemming from digital interactions (Krungsri Research).
For ordinary Thai readers, the lesson is simple but urgent: while AI can be a powerful ally for learning, creativity, and even limited mental health support, it is no substitute for real human connection, nor is it a replacement for professional care in times of emotional crisis. As with other emerging technologies, the best defense is awareness—of both the tools’ potential and their limits. If you or someone you know feels overwhelmed or anxious after interacting with AI agents, do not hesitate to consult mental health professionals, reach out to community “hotlines,” or engage with trusted friends and family. And as AI becomes more woven into daily life in Thailand, all users are urged to stay informed, advocate for balanced policies, and treat technology as a supplement—not a substitute—for the vital bonds that sustain our wellbeing.
Sources: