Maui County has taken a significant legislative step to strengthen agricultural tourism, now permitting “ag-tourism” as an accessory use in its agricultural districts, with the notable exception of Molokaʻi, according to a recent report by Maui Now. The change reflects broader trends in rural economies worldwide and offers valuable perspectives for Thailand as the Kingdom seeks to diversify tourist experiences and uplift rural incomes.
The move by Maui’s county council is a response to the growing recognition that farms can be much more than just places of production; they are also destinations where travelers can learn about local cuisine, sustainable agriculture, and traditional lifestyles. This shift, known as agricultural tourism or agri-tourism, is significant for rural regions’ sustainability, combining income generation for farmers with cultural exchange and environmental education. In Maui’s case, the expansion does not extend to Molokaʻi, reflecting local community sentiment and unique agricultural traditions on this less-developed Hawaiian island.
Background statistics suggest that agricultural tourism is increasingly vital for diversified economies. For Thailand, with more than 30% of its population involved in agriculture (Thai Office of Agricultural Economics), agri-tourism represents a considerable opportunity. Farms offering homestays, fruit-picking, handicraft workshops, and demonstrations of traditional rice planting have already found enthusiastic audiences, particularly among urban residents and foreign visitors seeking authentic local experiences. In Maui, the new regulation encourages similar creativity, enabling farms to build tasting rooms, offer farm tours, and host events that boost both revenue and public awareness about agriculture.
According to the Hawaii AgriTourism Association, U.S. farms that combine operations with tourism offerings can increase their annual income by 20-30%. In practice, the legislation means that more farmers in Maui County (except Molokaʻi) can legally welcome visitors for agri-tourism activities without special permitting. Farmers’ representatives lauded the measure. A spokesperson for Maui’s farm bureau, quoted in the original Maui Now article, said, “Ag-tourism is a win-win; it sustains family farms while educating the community and visitors about the importance of agriculture.”
In Thailand, current regulations regarding land use and rural tourism are complex and often region-specific. The Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives has been promoting community-based tourism for years, especially through initiatives like “One Tambon, One Product” (OTOP) and royal rural development projects. However, many Thai farmers face obstacles relating to zoning, health and safety standards, and marketing know-how, similar to the challenges Maui’s farmers encountered prior to the rule change. The Maui County experience illustrates the importance of clear policy frameworks that support smallholder innovation and allow rural communities to capitalize on their unique cultural heritage.
Experts such as academic staff from Kasetsart University’s Faculty of Agriculture note that successful agri-tourism depends on a robust partnership between local government, farmers’ networks, and tourism authorities. One agribusiness lecturer commented, “For Thai agriculture to thrive in the tourism sector, we need supportive land-use policies and training programs that help farmers develop hospitality skills and market their experiences effectively.” This reflection echoes global research showing that rural tourism flourishes when regulatory, educational, and marketing support are aligned (UNWTO, 2023).
For Maui, deliberate exclusion of Molokaʻi stems from a respect for community values and a desire to preserve traditional lifestyles. In Thailand, certain communities—such as those among Northern hill tribes or deep South Muslim villages—also express concern about the potential cultural impacts of commercial tourism. Tailoring policies to fit local aspirations is essential for ensuring that agri-tourism is both economically and culturally sustainable.
Historically, Thai rural tourism has seen boom-and-bust cycles, often influenced by high-profile promotional campaigns. During the COVID-19 pandemic, domestic tourism to rural areas surged as city dwellers sought safe, open-air environments. However, sustainability requires more than momentary trends; systematic integration of agri-tourism into rural development plans can buffer farmers against commodity price shocks and provide year-round income.
Looking forward, Maui’s new regulations could be a bellwether for similar reforms in Thailand. Provided that such policies are grounded in market research, community consultation, and environmental planning, agri-tourism can serve as a linchpin for rural resilience—providing livelihoods, celebrating rural heritage, and deepening visitors’ appreciation for the vital role farmers play. A crucial next step for Thailand would be the streamlining of land-use regulations, the expansion of training for rural hosts, and the building of digital platforms to connect tourists with authentic rural offerings.
For Thai readers and stakeholders interested in the future of tourism and agriculture, the key lesson from Maui’s recent decision is the value of flexibility and partnerships. Local governments are encouraged to review and modernize land-use policies to better support innovative forms of tourism, while remaining sensitive to each community’s unique needs and wishes. Farmers and community groups are urged to explore ways to share their knowledge and way of life with a wider audience, benefiting both the land and the people. And, as global travelers continue to seek out meaningful, responsible experiences, Thailand’s countryside could well become a model for sustainable agri-tourism in Southeast Asia.
For further reading and source material, see: