A new parenting trend dubbed “FAFO” — an acronym for “F*** Around and Find Out” — is drawing widespread attention as parents search for effective discipline alternatives amid shifting generational values. The approach, which intentionally lets children experience the natural consequences of their choices, is gaining traction as a counterpoint to the predominantly gentle parenting style favored in recent years. Its viral rise has stimulated debate among psychologists and educators about its long-term effects on children’s development, confidence, and mental health, raising important questions for Thai families and schools adapting parenting principles for the modern era (The Independent).
The emergence of FAFO parenting coincides with a growing sentiment among parents that current gentle approaches, characterized by patience, negotiation, and emotional attunement, may not always build the resilience or independence needed for adulthood. In practice, FAFO operates simply: parents warn about likely outcomes, but allow children to make their own choices — and face the resulting consequences, whether that means getting soaked because they refused to take a raincoat, or missing dinner because they refused to eat what was made. Supporters say this style helps children internalize cause-and-effect and fosters self-sufficiency, a trait many believe is increasingly lacking in young people.
“We protect kids from everything, they struggle with confidence and resilience… because they haven’t gone through things and been successful,” said a parent coach and adjunct professor at a US-based education and criminal justice college, in an interview with The Independent. She emphasizes that children, including toddlers, can benefit from learning through carefully managed experiences of failure or discomfort — provided those experiences do not put them or others at genuine risk. “Even toddlers can figure out if they’re running too fast and they crash and fall, then next time they’ll learn to slow it down a little bit more.”
The FAFO approach is often contrasted with “authoritative” parenting — traditionally considered the gold standard in developmental psychology for balancing high expectations with warmth and support. While FAFO emphasizes consequence, some experts argue it can become too punitive if not moderated by open communication and empathy. As explained by the same parent coach, “fafo is like a fun, fancy name that has come around and is a little spicier to fit some of the spicier parents that are out there.”
On the other side of the debate, a child psychologist and founder of an evidence-based model for collaborative problem-solving warns against relying on consequences, whether natural or adult-imposed. The former Harvard faculty member, now running a non-profit for child behavioral health, explained: “Many children don’t respond to either [natural or adult-imposed consequences]. Consequences alone rarely address the root causes of behavior, but adults often rely on them due to a lack of alternative strategies.” According to him, problematic behaviors like resistance to chores, waking up, or limits on screen time signal unsolved developmental or emotional challenges, not just rule-breaking. The optimal response, he argues, is collaborative — adults working together with the child to identify obstacles and agree on solutions.
These differing views are reflected in parental confusion about when and how consequences should be used. The parent coach cited concerns about parents misapplying FAFO principles — for instance, removing a teen’s phone over a minor infraction or emotional moment, instead of for clear breaches of safety or trust like sending explicit messages. “Consequences that make sense and fit the crime… can be helpful, but I feel like a lot of parents do not use them in the right way,” she said.
The controversy highlights an ongoing tension in global parenting culture: how best to raise children who are adaptable, emotionally healthy, and responsible, without resorting to either unchecked permissiveness or draconian discipline. These questions are especially salient in Thailand today, where rapidly changing cultural expectations, high academic pressures, and a growing awareness of child psychology have led many families to re-examine their approach to parenting.
Historically, traditional Thai parenting favored an “authoritarian” stance: strict obedience, respect for elders, and modest emotional expression were prized virtues. However, this approach has been increasingly critiqued by education reformers and mental health advocates for potentially stifling creativity, self-confidence, and intrinsic motivation (Bangkok Post). Meanwhile, the rise of “modern parenting” — often inspired by Western education and media — has seen more parents encourage dialogue, emotional validation, and child-led learning. Yet some teachers and relatives still see these methods as too lenient, particularly when it comes to dealing with ordinary acts of defiance or carelessness.
A prominent Thai psychologist from a leading child and adolescent mental health institution noted, “Thai culture has long valued harmony, but also values perseverance and learning from hardship. The challenge is to combine our tradition of familial warmth with approaches that also build responsibility and independence.” This points to a broader challenge: how to navigate between old and new values, without losing the strengths of either.
Data from the Thai Department of Mental Health shows a notable rise in depression, anxiety, and stress-related complaints among children and teenagers, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic (Department of Mental Health, Thailand), underlining the need for parenting strategies that nurture both emotional security and self-reliance. Some educators believe that structured “failures” — for example, letting a child experience a forgotten assignment’s natural consequences — can teach valuable lessons if paired with supportive follow-up discussions.
There is also a Thai cultural dimension: Buddhist teachings adopted in many Thai households encourage reflection, mindfulness, and understanding the causes and effects of actions. Integrating these teachings with appropriate use of consequences may offer a distinctly local answer to the FAFO debate. A senior monk from a prominent urban temple commented in a recent homily, “It is good for children to learn that actions have results, but it is also important for parents to help them learn to reflect calmly and kindly about those results.”
Looking forward, experts suggest a hybrid approach: leveraging FAFO methods to build resilience, but within a context where parents remain emotionally available and willing to collaborate and listen. This may mean letting children face a rainstorm if they ignore advice — but also being ready with a warm towel and a calm conversation afterward to reinforce the connection between choice, consequence, and care.
For Thai parents and schools, the key is thoughtful adaptation: using culturally resonant values alongside evidence-based parenting strategies. “There is no single right way, but there should always be room for both discipline and dialogue,” advised a senior Thai child psychologist interviewed for a Bangkok parenting magazine.
As interest in FAFO parenting grows, so too does the need for parental support, education, and dialogue. Workshops for Thai parents on positive discipline, growth mindset, and emotional communication are increasingly available at leading hospitals, schools, and community centers. The Ministry of Education has also begun piloting home-school communication programs designed to support parents in combining structure with sensitivity (Ministry of Education Thailand). Informational campaigns encourage parents to distinguish between “letting kids learn” and “abandoning them to failure,” emphasizing the importance of tailored, context-aware guidance.
For parents considering the FAFO approach, practical recommendations include:
- Making explicit in advance the logical connection between choices and outcomes (e.g., “If you don’t bring your umbrella, you’ll get wet.”)
- Using natural consequences only when safe and developmentally appropriate
- Avoiding unnecessary punishment or contrived scenarios, focusing instead on real-life learning
- Following up consequences with empathy and conversation about what can be learned from the experience
- Collaborating with children and teenagers on navigating recurring problems, rather than relying solely on discipline
- Seeking community resources, support groups, or professional advice if family conflicts become overwhelming
Ultimately, the FAFO parenting debate serves as a reminder of the universal challenge of child-rearing: preparing children for a world that requires both independence and connection. For Thai families, synthesizing the best of tradition and innovation — and remaining open to new scientific and cultural knowledge — may offer the surest path forward.
Sources: