Skip to main content

Five types of people to avoid — what psychology says and what Thai readers should do about it

7 min read
1,423 words
Share:

A recent psychology-focused roundup that lists five types of people to steer clear of — the constant critic, the manipulator, the drama-seeker, the “energy vampire” and the envious peer — has renewed conversations about how social ties shape mental health. The piece argues these relationship patterns are not just irritating, but can cause measurable harm to self-esteem, stress regulation and long-term wellbeing, making the case for proactive boundary-setting. For Thai readers grappling with rising rates of stress and loneliness, the advice to recognise and limit contact with corrosive personalities carries practical importance for family life, schools and workplaces. This report translates those psychological concepts into Thai social and policy context, explains why avoidance can be a health strategy, and offers concrete steps suited to local culture.

Why this matters in Thailand now is clear: national and international health bodies report growing levels of stress, depression risk and social disconnection across age groups, especially among children and young adults. Recent government and global mental health monitoring show that sizable shares of the population report high stress and depressive symptoms, with youth bearing a larger burden than older cohorts. Social isolation and poor interpersonal support are linked to higher rates of anxiety, suicidal behaviour and reduced productivity, and policy campaigns such as a national “Mind Month” effort underline the priority placed on mental health. In a country where family networks and workplace relationships strongly influence daily life, identifying toxic interaction styles can be a preventative measure against burnout and emotional decline.

The constant critic undermines confidence by offering relentless negative evaluations without constructive suggestions, and psychologists warn repeated criticism trains the brain to expect failure. This pattern can produce chronic self-doubt, amplified perfectionism and avoidance of new challenges — outcomes connected to heightened anxiety and reduced achievement over time. For many Thais who internalise social feedback because of collective cultural norms, persistent criticism from family or supervisors can be especially corrosive. Practical signals to watch for include interactions that leave you feeling smaller, replaying negative comments, or second-guessing decisions shortly after conversations with a particular person.

Manipulators use charm, guilt and distortions of reality to shape others’ behaviour; gaslighting is a common tactic that causes victims to question their own memory and judgement. Psychological models describe how this dynamic gradually erodes self-trust and increases dependence on the manipulator for validation, which can trap people in unequal and emotionally harmful relationships. In professional settings, manipulative managers or colleagues may assign blame unfairly or weaponise empathy to extract extra effort, while in personal life a manipulative relative may use cultural expectations of duty to maintain control. Recognising repeated patterns of blame-shifting, shifting narratives, or feeling obliged to explain oneself constantly are early red flags.

Drama-seekers and chronic conflict-pullers create emotional volatility that bumps up stress hormone activity and reduces cognitive bandwidth for work and study, according to behavioural science. Being repeatedly drawn into interpersonal crises consumes attention, interrupts routines and diminishes the emotional resources available for meaningful relationships and personal goals. In Thai social circles where gossip and relational reputation can spread quickly, people who manufacture or escalate drama can destabilise entire friend groups or workplaces. Minimising exposure to those who consistently create turmoil helps preserve steadiness, which in turn supports learning, parenting and job performance.

“Energy vampires” describe people who repeatedly take emotional energy without reciprocating support, often through chronic complaining or demanding attention for their own problems while offering little care in return. This one-sided dynamic creates fatigue and resentment and can leave people feeling emotionally bankrupt after repeated meetings. Psychologists link such draining relationships to increased risk of depression and reduced resilience, especially when support systems are otherwise weak. For Thais with strong familial obligations, the choice to set clearer limits with energy-draining relatives can be difficult, yet it is also essential to avoid long-term emotional depletion.

Envy corrodes celebration of others’ success and can translate into subtle sabotage, double-speak or consistent downplaying of achievements in social and professional contexts. When people around you react to accomplishments with comparison rather than congratulations, it breeds insecurity and mistrust and discourages risk-taking that fuels growth. In education and workplaces, envy-driven dynamics undermine collaboration and prompt people to hide progress or avoid visible achievements, which worsens organisational culture. Recognising patterns of downplaying, unnecessary competition or undermining comments allows individuals and leaders to address toxic comparisons before they normalize.

Mental health experts and global health authorities underline the physical as well as psychological consequences of poor social environments, stressing that social connection protects health while toxic ties increase risk. Officials at multilateral health bodies have emphasised that isolation and adversarial relationships are measurable risk factors for cardiovascular disease, stroke and early mortality, and that fostering healthy connection is a public health priority. As one international health statement put it, “social connection is not just vital for emotional and mental well-being; it is essential for physical health and longevity,” a reminder that relationship quality matters for the whole body. Clinicians in Thailand increasingly frame boundary-setting not as selfishness but as preventive mental healthcare that safeguards the caregiver as well as the cared-for.

For Thailand specifically, the implications cut across families, schools and employers, and align with ongoing national efforts to strengthen mental health services and community support. Recent domestic monitoring shows worrying levels of stress and depressive symptoms, particularly among students and young workers, which makes early intervention in daily relationships highly relevant. Schools can integrate social emotional learning that teaches children how to spot manipulative behaviour and practice assertive, respectful boundary-setting, while workplaces can train managers to avoid destructive criticism and to reward cooperative behaviour. Community-level initiatives, including temple-based programmes and volunteer networks, offer culturally resonant venues for promoting balanced relationships that combine compassion with personal limits.

Cultural context matters for how Thai people interpret and act on advice to “stay away” from certain personalities, because Buddhist values of compassion, filial piety and social harmony shape responses to conflict. Avoidance can feel disrespectful or burdensome when family duty is invoked, and direct confrontation is often avoided in favour of preserving face. That creates a need for culturally sensitive strategies: framing boundary-setting as an act of metta — loving-kindness that preserves the whole family’s wellbeing — allows people to reduce harmful contact without violating social norms. Historical patterns of intergenerational co-residence and community caregiving also mean that practical limits, such as scheduling, role clarification and gentle negotiation, are often more feasible than abrupt cuts in contact.

Looking ahead, public health and education policy in Thailand can reinforce individual strategies by mainstreaming relationship literacy and stress-resilience skills across curricula, employer training and primary care. If mental health campaigns combine awareness of toxic relationship types with tools for negotiation, referral pathways and community support, the burden of relational harm can be reduced at population level. Digital platforms also offer both risk and opportunity: while social media can amplify drama and envy, it can also host peer-support groups and low-cost psychoeducation tailored for Thai audiences. Employers who adopt clear policies against manipulative or abusive management practices will not only protect staff mental health but also gain productivity and lower turnover.

Practical steps Thais can take immediately include: practise brief, assertive scripts to refuse emotionally draining requests; limit time in high-drama settings and schedule recovery activities afterwards; reframe boundary-setting as protecting family harmony and future caregiving capacity; teach children how to recognise and report manipulative behaviour; and encourage workplaces to adopt feedback models that separate evaluation from personal criticism. People who feel overwhelmed should be steered toward existing mental health services and community networks that respect cultural norms, while leaders in education and health should prioritise relationship literacy in public messaging. For policymakers, investing in prevention programs that teach relationship skills and in strengthening primary mental health care will pay dividends in reduced illness and improved social cohesion.

The case to distance yourself from persistent critics, manipulators, drama creators, energy-draining individuals and envious associates is not about abandoning empathy, but about protecting capacity to give care, work and learn. In Thailand’s family-oriented society, the most effective approach balances compassion with firm limits, leverages community supports and redefines boundary-setting as a collective investment in wellbeing. By combining individual action, organisational change and public policy, Thai communities can reduce the health harms that arise from toxic relationships while preserving the deep social ties that sustain them. For readers wondering how to start, begin with one small boundary this week — a five-minute reduction in conversation with someone who leaves you depleted — and track whether calm, focus and emotional energy improve in the following days.

Related Articles

8 min read

Shared Laughter, Stronger Bonds: New Advice from a Psychologist and What It Means for Thai Couples

news psychology

A new popular article urges couples to build a simple daily habit.
The habit is to share small moments of laughter together. (Forbes) (Forbes article)

The piece draws on a 2015 academic study.
That study finds shared laughter predicts relationship quality and closeness. (Shared laughter study)

This news matters to Thai readers for three reasons.
First, Thai families remain central to social life and wellbeing.
Second, rising divorce and family stress affect children and communities.
Third, small daily habits can be practical in busy Thai lives.

#relationships #mentalhealth #Thailand +5 more
6 min read

Understanding High-Level Gaslighting: Psychologists Reveal Four Warning Signs

news psychology

Recent research and expert insight are shining new light on a highly sophisticated form of emotional manipulation known as high-level gaslighting. For Thai readers navigating complex social, workplace, or family dynamics, recognizing this subtle psychological tactic is an emerging mental health priority. Drawing on the latest findings and expert commentary from psychologists published by Parade and AOL (Parade, AOL), this in-depth report explores the hallmark behaviors of high-level gaslighters, their impact on well-being, and practical strategies for protection—contextualized for Thai society.

#mentalhealth #psychology #gaslighting +5 more
6 min read

Five Major Threats to Modern Relationships Revealed by Psychologist’s Groundbreaking Study

news psychology

A new research study unveiled by a leading psychologist highlights the five most significant threats undermining modern romantic relationships. Drawing from the latest findings published in the American Journal of Psychology, the research sheds light on why so many couples today find love and commitment increasingly challenging—and what can be done to safeguard intimacy in Thailand’s rapidly evolving society (Forbes).

As Thailand’s urban centers mirror global trends in digital connectivity, long work hours, and shifting cultural values, the study’s outcomes resonate deeply with the local context. The research offers an urgent wake-up call for couples and families alike, signaling that proactive adaptation is essential for relationship health in the face of contemporary stressors.

#relationships #mentalhealth #technology +7 more

Medical Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered medical advice. Always consult with qualified healthcare professionals before making decisions about your health.