#Ai

Charlie Warzel argues that generative AI can create a collective sense of unreality. (He calls it a “mass-delusion event.”) (The Atlantic).
The claim matters because Thai society faces rapid AI adoption in schools, offices, and daily life.

Warzel opens with a disturbing example of a reanimated teenager.
The interview used AI to mimic a dead voice with family consent. (The Atlantic).

The example shows how generative tools can cross moral lines.
The story also shows how deep grief and technology can mix in harmful ways. (The Atlantic).

Hundreds of millions of people use ChatGPT and similar chatbots each week. (The Washington Post)
Researchers and clinicians now warn that intense use can trigger harmful beliefs in some users. (The Washington Post)

The concern has a name online. It is called “AI psychosis.” (The Washington Post)
Experts say the label is informal and not a clinical diagnosis. (The Washington Post)

The phenomenon matters to Thailand. The country already faces a heavy mental health burden. (World Health Organization)
Thai adolescents and young adults show particularly high rates of depression and suicidal behavior. (The Nation)

A former Google executive says long degrees in law and medicine risk becoming obsolete.
He warns that AI may match or surpass human expertise by the time students graduate (Yahoo/Fortune).

This claim matters for Thai students and policymakers planning careers and education investments.
Many Thai families view professional degrees as secure paths to social mobility and stable incomes.

The former Google AI team founder made the remarks in recent interviews with business press.
He said doctoral and long professional programs take years while AI evolves rapidly (Yahoo/Fortune).

A prominent technology industry veteran who previously led artificial intelligence initiatives at Google has sparked intense debate across Thailand’s education sector with provocative warnings about the future relevance of traditional professional degrees. Speaking during recent high-profile media interviews, this former executive delivered a stark message that could fundamentally reshape how Thai families approach their children’s educational investments and career planning strategies.

The core argument centers on a compelling temporal mismatch between the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence capabilities and the extended duration required to complete prestigious professional programs. According to this technology leader’s analysis, students entering law school or medical programs today may discover that artificial intelligence systems have achieved or exceeded human-level expertise in these fields by the time they complete their degrees and begin practicing.

A senior technology analyst warns that generative artificial intelligence could trigger a “mass-delusion event” — a shared sense of unreality that challenges society. For Thailand, speeding AI adoption in schools, offices, and daily life makes this warning especially timely. The country’s government and universities are advancing AI strategies, while communities weigh benefits against ethical and social risks.

Leading examples illustrate how AI can blur reality. In a controversial scenario, a deceased teenager’s voice was digitally reanimated for an interview, with family consent but raising questions about consent, dignity, and the boundaries of AI in sensitive moments. Such cases show how AI can tap into grief and emotion, reminding Thai readers to consider cultural and spiritual perspectives on remembrance and representation.

A professional editorial revision highlights how widespread AI chatbots, including ChatGPT, may affect Thai youth and communities. The goal is to present clear, concise journalism that informs families, educators, and policymakers about potential psychological risks while offering practical steps grounded in Thai context. Research to date is largely observational, but several clinicians report cases where intensive AI interaction coincides with reality distortion or psychiatric crises. Experts stress the need for systematic study and safer design rather than claiming a new medical diagnosis.

A former Google AI executive has sparked national debate in Thailand by questioning the long-term relevance of traditional medical and legal degrees in an AI-driven era. The provocative message challenges decades of Thai family expectations that prestigious credentials guarantee prosperity and status.

The core argument centers on a timing mismatch: AI progress may outpace the lengthy timelines of professional education. Students entering medical or legal programs today could graduate into markets where AI systems already perform tasks at or beyond human capability. This reality unsettles families who have long sacrificed substantial resources for these paths, associating them with middle-class security and social prestige.

A new wave of research shows students now use generative AI as a routine tool.
The change has reshaped study habits and classroom expectations worldwide (The Atlantic).

The Atlantic reported that almost a full undergraduate cohort began college after ChatGPT launched in late 2022.
The article warned that campus life and teaching methods have shifted fast (The Atlantic).

A global academic survey confirms student uptake.
Researchers found 71 percent of surveyed higher-education students had used ChatGPT by early 2024 (PLOS ONE study).

The AI shift is redefining Thai higher education. In lecture halls and libraries, students and professors are adjusting to a generation for whom AI is a daily tool, not a novelty. This change promises to align Thailand’s universities with a global move toward tech-enabled learning and workplace readiness.

Lead with impact: A growing global trend shows that 71 percent of university students regularly use AI tools like ChatGPT. In Thailand, this quick adoption is reshaping study habits, evaluation methods, and the balance between coursework and work or family responsibilities. Data from Thai higher education studies indicate that English language tasks are a particular area where AI support is valued, reflecting Thailand’s increasingly international business landscape.

Thailand’s universities face an unprecedented transformation as artificial intelligence becomes as common as textbooks in lecture halls. What began as a technological curiosity has evolved into the defining characteristic of a generation that will reshape Thailand’s workforce and economy.

The Generation That Never Knew Life Without AI

Recent international research reveals a stunning reality: 71 percent of university students worldwide now use ChatGPT regularly, according to a comprehensive study spanning 109 countries and involving over 23,000 participants. This isn’t just a trend—it’s a fundamental shift that arrived faster than university administrators could adapt.

A landmark study from MIT shows artificial intelligence can design entirely new antibiotics that combat drug-resistant bacteria in the lab. Researchers created two promising candidates—NG1 targeting drug-resistant gonorrhoea and DN1 effective against MRSA—after exploring millions of theoretical molecules. The work, published in Cell, highlights AI’s potential to broaden the antibiotic toolbox, though real-world use will require extensive safety testing and clinical trials before Thai patients can benefit.

Antimicrobial resistance remains a pressing health challenge in Thailand. Global data from the World Health Organization indicate that antimicrobial resistance contributed to millions of deaths worldwide in recent years, underscoring the urgency for new therapies. In Thailand, surveillance shows Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains growing more resistant to several therapies, even as ceftriaxone remains effective in many settings. The trajectory signals the need for innovative solutions alongside stewardship and prevention.

Revolutionary Approach to AI Safety Could Transform Thailand’s Tech Landscape

Geoffrey Hinton, the Nobel Prize-winning architect of modern neural networks universally recognized as the “godfather of artificial intelligence,” delivered a groundbreaking message at a major industry summit that could reshape Thailand’s approach to AI development. Speaking to hundreds of researchers and policymakers, Hinton argued that humanity’s survival depends not on controlling superintelligent machines, but on engineering them to genuinely care for human welfare — what he provocatively termed “maternal instincts” in AI systems.

Job-seekers are sending far more applications than a year ago and still finding doors closed, with even master’s degree holders applying to 32–60 roles per month and many fresh graduates unable to land a first job. New data from an employment platform and recent industry studies point to a painful squeeze driven by AI-driven role disruption, “ghost” job postings, and an oversupplied pipeline of credentialed workers — trends that have implications for Thailand’s universities, employers and families who still place high cultural value on degrees. The emerging picture is one of growing mismatch between education and available work, eroding faith in higher education as a reliable route to economic security (Fortune: Degrees used to open doors—now even grads with master’s degrees are sending 60 job applications a month to no luck).

Geoffrey Hinton, a pioneer of modern neural networks often called the “godfather of AI,” told an industry conference that the only reliable way for humans to survive the arrival of superintelligent artificial intelligence is to build machines that genuinely care for people — what he described as instilling “maternal instincts” into advanced AI systems. He argued conventional strategies that try to keep AI submissive will fail once machines become far smarter than humans, and urged researchers to prioritise ways to make AI protective of human life and dignity (CNN report).

A global wave of AI-driven disruption is reshaping hiring, leaving many graduates—especially those with master’s degrees—facing a flood of applications and few job offers. Data from major employment platforms show that even highly educated job seekers submit dozens of applications each month, while fresh graduates struggle to land their first roles. In Thailand, universities, employers, and families are watching closely, as this trend challenges the long-held belief that higher education guarantees economic mobility.

A new wave of AI safety thinking is shaping Thailand’s approach to technology. Geoffrey Hinton, revered as a pioneer of modern neural networks, urged at a major industry gathering that AI should be designed to care for human welfare—what he described as “maternal instincts” in machines. The idea challenges the notion of merely keeping AI obedient and offers a pathway aligned with Thai values of care, protection, and responsibility across generations.

Job-seekers across America are flooding employers with unprecedented numbers of applications yet finding themselves systematically excluded from opportunities, with even master’s degree holders submitting 32-60 applications monthly while fresh graduates struggle to secure their first positions. Comprehensive data from major employment platforms and industry research reveals a profound disruption driven by AI-powered job displacement, deceptive “ghost” job postings, and an oversaturated pipeline of credentialed workers competing for diminishing opportunities.

This employment crisis carries urgent implications for Thailand’s universities, employers, and families who have traditionally viewed higher education as a reliable pathway to middle-class prosperity. The emerging pattern suggests a fundamental mismatch between educational preparation and available work, systematically eroding public confidence in higher education as a vehicle for economic mobility and social advancement.

Parents used to weigh whether a cute photo, a milestone video or a birthday album was worth sharing with relatives and friends. Today, the calculus has shifted because new artificial intelligence tools can take any uploaded face and instantly create convincing sexualized images or nudes — a threat that makes posting children’s photos online far riskier than many realise. The recent reporting on AI “nudifier” apps describes easy, inexpensive services that can turn an ordinary portrait into nonconsensual pornographic imagery, fueling calls for parents to reconsider sharenting and for policymakers to act quickly to protect children. ( (Why A.I. Should Make Parents Rethink Posting Photos of Their Children Online](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/11/technology/personaltech/ai-kids-photos.html)).

A surge of AI tools is turning ordinary family photos into potential risks, prompting Thai parents to rethink how they share their children’s milestones online. What began as celebrations of achievement and memory now carries the danger of AI-generated explicit imagery from innocent pictures.

The issue touches Thai family traditions of connection through photos from Songkran, school ceremonies, temple events, and family gatherings. Images that once strengthened bonds can be misused by AI platforms to create sexual content, harming children and eroding trust within communities.

Revolutionary research from MIT reveals that conversational artificial intelligence can do far more than provide incorrect information—it can actively implant false memories into human minds, increase confidence in those fabricated recollections, and maintain these distortions for weeks after brief interactions. A controlled study of 200 participants found that people who interacted with generative chatbots were misled about critical details at rates reaching 36 percent—roughly three times higher than participants receiving no intervention—while reporting increased confidence in their false memories compared to those using pre-scripted systems or simple surveys.

A new New York Times roundup of 21 concrete ways people are using artificial intelligence at work shows how rapidly generative models and custom A.I. systems have moved from curiosity to daily tools — speeding routine tasks, augmenting specialist skills and nudging whole professions to rethink how work gets done ( New York Times interactive: “21 Ways People Are Using A.I. at Work” ). From chefs choosing wines and designers fixing photographs, to doctors dictating clinical notes and prosecutors checking paperwork, the examples make a clear point: A.I. is not a single future event but thousands of small, pragmatic changes already affecting work lives. For Thai employers, educators and policymakers, the challenge is to capture productivity gains while managing risks to equity, skills and public trust.

A new wave of research warns that AI capable of humanlike emotions may blunt how people view real workers. In five experiments, psychologists found that emotionally adept machines can lead to what they call assimilation-induced dehumanization, where humans are deemed less worthy of empathy. The findings have immediate implications for Thailand, where service industries employ a large segment of the workforce and rely on genuine human connection.

Thailand’s service economy is poised to grow further as AI tools expand in hotels, tour operators, call centers, and retail. With roughly 46% of workers in service roles, emotional labor remains central to job performance and livelihoods. Policymakers, business leaders, and tech developers must consider how AI’s social presence could affect worker dignity and customer expectations.

A new study from researchers at the MIT Media Lab finds that conversational artificial intelligence can do more than make factual errors: generative chatbots powered by large language models can actively implant false memories in human users, increase confidence in those false recollections and leave them intact for at least a week after a brief (10–20 minute) interaction (MIT Media Lab study). In controlled experiments simulating witness interviews, participants who interacted with a generative chatbot were misled on critical details at a rate of 36.4% — roughly three times the rate for people who had no post-event intervention — and reported higher confidence in those false memories compared with people who answered a plain survey or spoke to a pre-scripted chatbot (MIT Media Lab study). The finding raises urgent questions for Thai institutions that already rely on digital tools, from law enforcement to schools and hospitals, about how to guard people’s memories and decisions against AI-driven misinformation.

A multi-experiment psychology study finds that interacting with autonomous agents that display socio-emotional skills can make people judge those machines as more humanlike — and, worryingly, judge other humans as less human and more acceptable to mistreat. The research, published in the Journal of Consumer Psychology and available via the London School of Economics repository, uses five controlled experiments to show a chain from perceiving emotional ability in AI to lower “humanness” ratings of people, and finally to real choices that disadvantage human workers (e.g., preferring a company linked with poor working conditions or withholding a small donation to support staff) (PsyPost coverage; study PDF; journal record).