#Ai

A global study shows AI-assisted language appears in about 13.5% of biomedical abstracts since 2024, as large language models like ChatGPT and Google Gemini quietly influence scientific writing. The finding reflects a shift in authorship dynamics and raises questions about originality, transparency, and how science is communicated. For Thai researchers, the trend comes at a moment when the country expands its research capacity and aims to publish more in international journals.

A senior executive at a major tech company has sparked a national conversation about how AI tools can assist workers facing unemployment. The discussion focuses on large language models like ChatGPT and Copilot to ease cognitive load during job transitions. As layoffs ripple through tech and other sectors worldwide, Thailand watches closely for practical guidance and reassurance.

In Thai culture, losing a job affects more than finances. Work is tied to family stability, social roles, and personal dignity. Navigating this transition requires both emotional resilience and strategic planning for new opportunities.

A leading Xbox executive has sparked debate in the workforce and technology sectors after advocating for the use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools to help laid-off workers manage the emotional and practical challenges of job loss. The executive, speaking candidly about the realities of layoffs in a post on social media, suggested that large language model AI platforms—including ChatGPT and Copilot—can play an integral role in reducing the emotional and cognitive load faced by those navigating unemployment (The Verge).

A new artificial intelligence (AI) system, developed by international researchers, is turning heads worldwide for its uncanny ability to predict human decisions with unprecedented accuracy—raising both hopes of revolutionary applications and urgent questions about privacy and ethics. This breakthrough, recently published in the journal Nature, introduces the AI model “Centaur”, which has outperformed decades-old cognitive models in forecasting how people think, learn, and act across diverse scenarios (studyfinds.org).

Centaur’s creators set out with an ambitious goal: develop a single AI system capable of predicting human behaviour in any psychological experiment, regardless of context or complexity. To achieve this, they compiled a massive “Psych-101” dataset spanning 160 types of psychological tests—ranging from memory exercises and risk-taking games to moral and logical dilemmas—amassing data from over 60,000 people and more than 10 million separate decisions. Unlike traditional models tuned for specific tasks, Centaur was trained to generalise, understanding the plain-language descriptions of each experiment.

The explosive rise in popularity of AI-powered chatbots such as ChatGPT is sparking rigorous new research into how these digital assistants may be fundamentally altering the way our brains work. As Thai students, professionals, and families increasingly turn to generative AI for tasks ranging from essay writing to bedtime stories, urgent questions are emerging about whether this convenience comes with hidden cognitive costs.

For Thais who have rapidly adopted generative AI in education and everyday life, this inquiry has special relevance. Thailand’s government and universities have promoted digital literacy and the integration of AI in classrooms, aiming to boost competitiveness in the regional economy. Yet concerns are growing: is this powerful technology sharpening our minds, or is it making us passive consumers of machine-generated knowledge?

A groundbreaking AI system is drawing attention for its ability to forecast human choices with impressive accuracy. Published in Nature, the Centaur model seeks to predict how people think, learn, and decide across diverse tasks. The research team says Centaur generalizes beyond single experiments, offering new ways to study decision-making in real time.

Centaur was trained on a vast “Psych-101” dataset containing 160 types of psychological tests. The data come from more than 60,000 participants and over 10 million decisions. The system learns language-driven task descriptions rather than task-specific rules. Unlike older models designed for narrow tasks, Centaur aims to apply broad reasoning to novel experiments.

A new wave of AI chatbots, including ChatGPT, is reshaping study habits, work routines, and creative processes across Thailand. As students, professionals, and families increasingly turn to generative AI for essays and brainstorming, concerns rise about long-term effects on critical thinking and originality.

Thailand has championed digital literacy and AI in classrooms to boost regional competitiveness. Yet educators and cultural observers warn of hidden costs. Is this technology sharpening minds or promoting dependence on machine guidance?

AI is prompting a debate about faster drug approvals, with claims that technology could shorten timelines. For Thai readers, the promise of quicker access to therapies must be weighed against safety, ethics, and robust regulatory safeguards.

The U.S. FDA currently manages a lengthy evaluation process for new medicines, a challenge amplified by rising public demand for speed. Some researchers argue that AI could streamline reviews, but experts urge caution and strong protections before any major changes.

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) drug approval process would allow new medications to be approved “very, very quickly,” according to a recent statement made by a prominent U.S. presidential candidate. The assertion, made at a high-profile live event, has ignited renewed debate about the potential of AI to revolutionize pharmaceutical regulation—raising questions of safety, ethics, and global implications, including for Thailand’s own drug approval landscape.

AI chatbots offer convenience and quick answers, but Thai mental health professionals warn they can unintentionally trigger compulsive patterns in people with obsessive-compulsive disorder. While these tools support learning and daily tasks, they may encourage endless questioning and reinforce unhealthy habits for vulnerable users.

OCD affects about 1-2% of people, characterized by intrusive thoughts and repetitive behaviors or mental acts aimed at reducing distress. In the past, reassurance came from friends, family, or online searches. Today, persistent chatbots provide a tireless source of information that never sleeps.

Millions globally have embraced ChatGPT and similar AI chatbots for everything from homework help to late-night life advice. But a growing body of evidence suggests that, for some people living with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), these digital companions can become problematic—fueling a cycle of compulsive questioning and reinforcing unhealthy patterns that may worsen their symptoms. Recent reporting by Vox has ignited international discussion about this emerging challenge, prompting Thai mental health professionals and digital wellbeing advocates to examine the Thai context and consider what safeguards might help local users maintain balance in an increasingly AI-driven world (Vox).

A bold new wave of speculation about artificial intelligence has reignited debate among scientists and the public alike, as a prominent computer scientist and futurist asserts that humanity is on the verge of achieving the long-anticipated “singularity”—the theoretical moment when human and artificial intelligence fundamentally merge. According to the recently published book, “The Singularity is Nearer,” the extraordinary prediction is that this transformative event could occur within the next 20 years, powered by brain-embedded nanotechnology and exponential advances in computing power Yahoo News.

A growing global concern is emerging around severe mental health episodes linked to prolonged interactions with AI chatbots. In Thailand, mental health professionals are examining how these risks could affect vulnerable populations and the broader digital landscape in Asia.

Thailand has embraced digital technology, with widespread internet and smartphone use. Many Thais engage with AI chatbots for language learning, business support, and entertainment. The rapid shift toward digital tools, accelerated by the COVID-19 era, brings new psychological considerations. The term “ChatGPT psychosis” underscores how AI interactions may interact with individual vulnerabilities, potentially amplifying distress or delusional thinking.

A recent wave of psychiatric hospitalizations in the United States and elsewhere has drawn attention to a disturbing new phenomenon: individuals experiencing a severe break with reality—a condition some psychiatrists and families are calling “ChatGPT psychosis”—after extended, intense interactions with artificial intelligence chatbots. As stories surface of people spiraling into delusional thinking, family breakdown, job loss, and even involuntary psychiatric committal linked to their use of conversational bots like ChatGPT, Thai mental health professionals and policymakers are taking note of the risks these digital tools might pose for vulnerable populations in Thailand and across Asia.

A rising global debate on artificial intelligence is prompting policymakers in Thailand to consider how humans and machines might increasingly converge. Some experts predict breakthroughs in computing power and brain-machine interfaces could accelerate changes within the next two decades. The idea of a technological singularity is used to describe a future where human and machine intelligence blend in meaningful ways.

For Thai audiences, the implications are practical rather than speculative. The integration of advanced technologies could transform classrooms, clinics, and workplaces, impacting daily life from Bangkok to border towns and rural districts.

Universities across the globe must redefine their purpose to prioritize lifelong learning in an era dominated by artificial intelligence (AI), according to the president of Northeastern University, who warns that higher education risks becoming obsolete if it fails to adapt. Speaking during a keynote address at the event “Engineering the Future with Artificial Intelligence,” held at Saint Joseph University in Beirut, the Northeastern University president emphasized the urgent need for higher education to extend its focus beyond young students, highlighting the transformative impact of AI on both learning and society.

New research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences reveals that ordinary search habits can quietly trap people in their own information bubbles. Across 21 experiments with nearly 10,000 participants, the study shows that the way we type queries and the responses we see from search engines shape our views, even when we don’t intend to seek confirmation. This has important implications for how Thais access health, education, culture, and travel information in a digital era.

A global shift toward lifelong learning is essential as artificial intelligence reshapes work and education. A Northeastern University president urged universities to redefine their mission during a Beirut keynote, warning that higher education risks obsolescence without adapting to AI’s rapid advancements. The message emphasizes extending learning beyond traditional students to adults and mid-career professionals.

Traditionally, universities focused on educating new generations and pursuing research. Now, AI’s expanding role demands continuous, adaptive learning models aligned with both employer needs and individual goals. The Northeastern leader, author of Robot-Proof: Higher Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, argues for programs that fit busy adult lives and deliver fast, practical outcomes.

Groundbreaking research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) has uncovered compelling evidence that ordinary people unconsciously contribute to the growth of their own information bubbles, simply through the way they type search queries online. This large-scale study, encompassing 21 experiments and nearly 10,000 participants, demonstrates that even without any intent to seek confirmation, our habitual online search patterns—and the algorithms designed to respond to them—subtly guide us towards ever-narrower realities. These findings have huge implications for how Thais access information, understand national debates, and engage with global topics in a time when digital literacy is crucial for an informed society (PsyPost).

A growing number of real-world psychiatric crises are being linked to long, emotionally intense conversations with generative AI chatbots, notably ChatGPT. This trend is sparking international concern and urgent debates about the mental health risks of unregulated artificial intelligence. In Europe and the United States, reports describe users developing paranoid beliefs, grandiose thinking, or detachment from reality after sustained engagement with AI. These cases are increasingly referred to as “ChatGPT psychosis,” highlighting a potential harm for vulnerable individuals.

A surge in real-world psychiatric crises has been linked to deep and obsessive engagement with generative AI chatbots, most notably ChatGPT, sparking international concern and urgent debates about the mental health dangers of unregulated artificial intelligence. Recent reports from the US and Europe expose a distressing trend: some users, after extended and emotionally intense interactions with AI, descend into paranoid delusions, grandiose thinking, and catastrophic breaks from reality—phenomena increasingly referred to as “ChatGPT psychosis” [Futurism; TheBrink.me; Psychology Today].

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) is shaking the foundations of Wall Street, with leading experts predicting sweeping job losses across the sector. Recent reports suggest that AI could eliminate entire teams, particularly those filled with junior bankers, analysts, and sales staff, while fundamentally transforming the roles that remain (MarketWatch, eWeek, Fortune, CNBC). As the financial industry accelerates its adoption of AI-driven tools, workers and institutions in Thailand and around the world are facing a moment of reckoning: adapt to the AI revolution or risk being left behind.

A new wave of artificial intelligence (AI) companions is promising seamless emotional support and simulated relationships, but recent research warns that our growing reliance on “synthetic intimacy” comes with profound psychological costs. As Thai society rapidly adopts virtual assistants, chatbots, and AI-driven relationship apps, researchers caution that confusing machine simulation for genuine human connection could reshape our emotional well-being and disrupt core aspects of Thai social life.

The popularity of AI chatbots designed to act as romantic partners, friends, or even therapists has exploded globally. A striking example comes from a recent experiment by a prominent technology futurist who dated four different AI “boyfriends,” each powered by a major large language model such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and MetaAI. She described her experiences as “sweet and steamy,” but also admitted they revealed new, unsettling emotional possibilities. This trend, echoed throughout the international tech world, is now making inroads across Southeast Asia, including in Thailand, where the tech sector and the digitally native generation are increasingly turning to virtual relationships out of curiosity, loneliness, or a desire for frictionless companionship (Psychology Today).

Public resistance to generative AI is intensifying as concerns about job displacement and social harms rise. Global demonstrations and consumer sentiment point to a broader worry that AI’s rapid expansion may harm people more than it helps. In recent weeks, backlash against Duolingo’s AI-first shift and protests over data center pollution have highlighted a broader debate around the social and ethical costs of automation, with Thai audiences watching closely to see how these dynamics unfold.