#Artificialintelligence

A wave of recent research into how movies, television, and books shape our beliefs about artificial intelligence shows that public fear tends to run deeper than a fear of machines alone. It is a fear of control, accountability, and the social order itself. The latest analysis mirrors a timeless tension: AI is alternately hailed as a savior and feared as a godlike harbinger of human subjugation. For Thai readers, this tension arrives not just in cinema or cyberspace but in everyday realities—how AI is taught in classrooms, how doctors use algorithms in clinics, and how families decide whether to trust smart assistants, online health tools, or automated tutoring platforms. In short, the stories we tell about AI shape how we will live with it.

A sweeping new analysis of more than 1.1 million scientific papers and preprints finds that the use of large language models (LLMs) to write or edit manuscripts rose sharply after the launch of ChatGPT in late 2022, with roughly 22.5% of computer science abstracts showing statistical signs of LLM modification by September 2024. The study applied a word‑frequency model trained to detect subtle linguistic fingerprints left by AI tools, and it uncovered fast-growing use across many fields — a trend that poses practical questions for research integrity, peer review and academic practice in Thailand as research institutions and journals grapple with both the promise and the pitfalls of generative AI.

A sweeping analysis of more than 1.1 million papers shows that large language models began shaping abstracts after ChatGPT’s launch in 2022. By September 2024, about 22.5% of computer science abstracts bore statistical signs of AI modification. This research used a word-frequency model to detect subtle linguistic fingerprints left by AI tools, revealing rapid uptake across fields and raising questions about integrity, peer review, and scholarly practice in Thailand.

For Thai readers, the takeaway is direct. Thailand is building AI capacity and increasing research output in science and engineering. If one in five computer science papers globally shows AI-influenced text, Thai universities, funders, and journals must craft clear policies to protect quality, while leveraging AI to improve writing without risking hallucinated claims or undisclosed authorship. The study’s pace suggests Thai researchers may already use generative tools in drafting, editing, and translation—sometimes transparently, sometimes not—and this matters for trust, reproducibility, and the credibility of Thai scholarship.

Revolutionary Approach to AI Safety Could Transform Thailand’s Tech Landscape

Geoffrey Hinton, the Nobel Prize-winning architect of modern neural networks universally recognized as the “godfather of artificial intelligence,” delivered a groundbreaking message at a major industry summit that could reshape Thailand’s approach to AI development. Speaking to hundreds of researchers and policymakers, Hinton argued that humanity’s survival depends not on controlling superintelligent machines, but on engineering them to genuinely care for human welfare — what he provocatively termed “maternal instincts” in AI systems.

Geoffrey Hinton, a pioneer of modern neural networks often called the “godfather of AI,” told an industry conference that the only reliable way for humans to survive the arrival of superintelligent artificial intelligence is to build machines that genuinely care for people — what he described as instilling “maternal instincts” into advanced AI systems. He argued conventional strategies that try to keep AI submissive will fail once machines become far smarter than humans, and urged researchers to prioritise ways to make AI protective of human life and dignity (CNN report).

A new wave of AI safety thinking is shaping Thailand’s approach to technology. Geoffrey Hinton, revered as a pioneer of modern neural networks, urged at a major industry gathering that AI should be designed to care for human welfare—what he described as “maternal instincts” in machines. The idea challenges the notion of merely keeping AI obedient and offers a pathway aligned with Thai values of care, protection, and responsibility across generations.

A Swiss mother’s candid confession about using AI to manage family life has sparked global discussions on technology’s role in child-rearing. Her experience with ChatGPT—from meal planning to soothing tantrums—offers lessons for Thai families navigating increasingly digital households.

The core question remains: can AI support overwhelmed parents without eroding authentic parent-child bonds? The answer lies in balancing convenience with intentional, human-centered care.

Mental load is a universal challenge for working parents. In Thailand, many mothers juggle professional duties with cultural expectations of perfect caregiving. Even when partners share tasks, the cognitive burden of scheduling, anticipating needs, and maintaining emotional climate often falls on one parent, driving demand for new solutions that reduce mental strain.

A groundbreaking parenting experiment conducted by a Swiss mother has triggered international debates about the future of child-rearing after she publicly credited artificial intelligence with revolutionizing her family’s daily management while raising profound questions about the appropriate role of technology in intimate family relationships. The 33-year-old Zurich resident’s viral confession that she feels like she’s “cheating at mom life” by using ChatGPT for everything from meal planning to tantrum management has sparked intense discussions among parenting experts worldwide about whether digital assistance represents liberation for overwhelmed parents or concerning erosion of authentic human connection in child development. Her bold embrace of AI co-parenting offers crucial insights for Thai families increasingly dependent on digital tools, particularly as rapid technological adoption intersects with traditional Thai values emphasizing warm family bonds and intergenerational wisdom sharing.

A Swiss mother has sparked intense discussion online and across parenting communities worldwide after revealing she uses ChatGPT—a prominent artificial intelligence tool—as a “third co-parent” in raising her 3-year-old daughter. Her unconventional approach, which recently went viral on TikTok and was featured on major media outlets such as Good Morning America, underscores the growing fascination and contentious debate over AI’s role in everyday family life (Independent).

The story, originating from Zurich, Switzerland, centers on a 33-year-old mother who openly credits ChatGPT with significantly easing her daily parenting load. “I feel like I’m cheating at mom life,” she admitted in a widely shared TikTok video, explaining how AI helped manage everything from meal planning and drafting grocery lists to navigating toddler tantrums and even supporting her own emotional well-being. Her candidness struck a chord with countless viewers, instantly fueling both admiration and skepticism about the technology’s reach into the home—and, by extension, the boundaries of modern parenting.

Rapid advancements in artificial intelligence are putting a growing number of jobs under threat, according to a newly published analysis by Microsoft’s research division. The study, which has stirred considerable debate in the global workforce, ranks 40 professions most vulnerable to disruption by AI, along with 40 occupations that are currently considered safe from the technology’s reach. As AI-powered applications become increasingly embedded in daily work, the implications for Thailand’s white-collar and blue-collar sectors will be profound—prompting urgent discussions on how the Kingdom can best prepare for this seismic shift.

A recent Microsoft Research analysis identifies 40 jobs most vulnerable to AI disruption and 40 deemed safer—for now. While the study centers on the U.S. labor market, its implications are clear for Thailand’s evolving economy. As AI tools become more embedded in daily work, both white- and blue-collar sectors in Thailand may experience rapid change, calling for urgent action from educators, policymakers, and industry leaders.

Research indicates AI is most likely to affect roles involving digitizable tasks, research, writing, and communication with limited hands-on work. Journalists, data-entry clerks, paralegals, accountants, telemarketers, market researchers, and model developers are among the higher-risk positions. Conversely, jobs that rely on human interaction or physical dexterity—such as massage therapists, construction workers, electricians, engineers, and surgeons—appear less exposed today, though advances in robotics could shift this balance in time. Thailand’s service-oriented economy, alongside growing digital government, finance, and tourism sectors, suggests these dynamics could unfold swiftly in local workplaces, education, and professional training.

Artificial intelligence is becoming a driving force for inclusive growth in education, healthcare, business, and public services. In Thailand, AI is transforming how people access information, learn, and participate in the economy, presenting a clear opportunity to narrow disparities.

AI’s core value lies in democratizing knowledge and widening participation in daily life and work. In Thailand, where digital literacy and access vary widely, AI has the potential to bridge rural and urban gaps. Experts note that AI applications—from language processing to diagnostic assistance—are already reshaping industries and creating new learning pathways for diverse communities.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly establishing itself as one of the most potent tools for empowerment in the modern world, according to the latest updates and thought leadership from OpenAI. As Thailand and nations around the globe grapple with digital transformation, AI’s expanding capabilities are fostering opportunities for education, healthcare, business, and social progress—marking a pivotal moment in how societies can harness technology for inclusive benefit.

The significance of this development lies in AI’s potential to democratize information, enabling wider participation in economic and knowledge-based activities. In Thailand, where digital literacy and accessibility remain pressing challenges, the promise of AI as a tool for empowerment resonates with policymakers aiming to bridge rural-urban divides and foster sustainable growth. Experts note that AI systems—from natural language processing to advanced diagnostics—are already reshaping industries and opening new educational pathways for learners of all backgrounds (OpenAI).

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) is not only transforming industries and daily life but is also poised to tackle one of humanity’s most persistent social issues: loneliness. Recent developments, as highlighted in a feature by The New Yorker, suggest that AI may soon be capable of providing companionship that is emotionally sophisticated and available at any time—an evolution that both excites technologists and worries experts in human well-being (The New Yorker). As these innovations draw nearer to mainstream adoption, Thai society must grapple with both the promises and perils of outsourcing human connection to machines.

Loneliness is rising in urban Thailand as fast-paced living and dense housing erode traditional community ties. Data suggest older adults often face isolation, especially as families shrink with urbanization and lower birth rates. The COVID-19 era intensified social gaps, highlighting the urgency for compassionate, locally relevant solutions.

Tech firms are racing to deliver AI companions—digital entities that can converse, simulate empathy, and remember user preferences. These virtual friends come as chatbots, voice assistants, or avatars, offering interactive dialogue that may help people who struggle to connect with others. In theory, such tools could reach people in rural areas, individuals with disabilities, or seniors who live apart from family, providing a steady source of conversation and support. Data from Thailand’s tech sector show growing interest in AI-powered mental health features and senior-friendly smart devices.

Pope Leo XIV has called on world leaders, tech innovators, and global citizens to ensure the development of artificial intelligence (AI) is guided by ethics, human dignity, and the promotion of peaceful societies. In a message delivered during the AI for Good Summit in Geneva on July 10, 2025, the pontiff urged the international community to establish robust frameworks and regulations that put the “common good” at the center of the AI revolution. As artificial intelligence increasingly shapes key sectors from healthcare and education to governance, the Pope’s intervention underlines mounting concerns about the pace and direction of AI development worldwide.

A new controversy has erupted in academic circles after investigators uncovered that a group of international researchers embedded secret instructions—so-called “hidden AI prompts”—within preprint manuscripts to influence AI-powered peer review systems toward more favorable feedback. The revelations were detailed in recent reports, following a data-driven exposé that found 17 preprint articles on the arXiv platform with covert commands instructing AI models to deliver only positive reviews, avoid criticism, and even explicitly recommend the work for its novelty and methodological rigor. This manipulation was achieved through invisible white text or minuscule fonts, remaining undetected by human readers but fully readable by AI engines tasked with the review process (Nikkei Asia, ExtremeTech, Japan Times).

Universities worldwide are rapidly reimagining computer science education as generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies such as ChatGPT reshape what future graduates need to know and how they will work. This transformation, driven by rapid advances in AI capable of writing code and performing mid-level software engineering tasks, has ignited a debate among educators about what the foundations of computer science should be in an era where machines can increasingly automate what students traditionally learn (nytimes.com).

A global shift is reshaping computer science curricula as generative AI takes on coding tasks and mid‑level software work. In this new landscape, educators are asking which foundations truly prepare students for a future where machines handle much of traditional learning.

For Thailand, the change is consequential. Computer science underpins digital transformation, job prospects, and policy goals. If international standards evolve, Thailand must adapt its workforce development and education system. The message from Thai and international educators is clear: knowing programming languages alone may not guarantee a strong career. Students need broader capabilities—computational thinking, AI literacy, and clear communication—to stay competitive as AI accelerates software development across sectors.

A recent incident at a prominent American university has reignited global debate over the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in education. On March 25, students enrolled in an undergraduate computer science course were informed that “clear evidence of AI usage” had been detected in one-third of submissions for a major problem set. The announcement, made via the course’s online platform, presented students with a stark ultimatum: admit to using AI within 10 days and accept a significant grade penalty, or risk more severe disciplinary measures, including referral to the university’s Executive Committee (ExComm) for academic misconduct (Yale Daily News).

A major U.S. university has sparked renewed discussion about AI in education, a conversation that matters for Thai students and educators alike. In a Computer Science 223 course, about one-third of major problem-set submissions showed clear AI use. To address this, students faced a choice: self-report AI assistance within 10 days with a significant grade penalty, or risk further disciplinary action including possible referral to the university’s academic misconduct committee.

A recent MIT-led study has ignited a global conversation about the cognitive impact of artificial intelligence (AI) use in education, warning that reliance on tools like ChatGPT could erode students’ ability to engage in deep, critical thinking and retain ownership of their ideas. The research, which has gained notable attention in international and Thai education circles, strikes at the heart of a rapidly growing dilemma—as AI-generated writing becomes easier and more prevalent, could it make us, in effect, intellectually lazier and less capable over time? (NYT)

A recent MIT-led study is fueling global debate on AI’s role in learning. As tools like ChatGPT become easier to use, concerns grow that students may rely on AI at the expense of deep understanding and retention. Thai educators and policymakers are watching closely as AI-assisted writing becomes more common in schools.

In the MIT experiment, 54 students wrote essays under three conditions: independent thinking, traditional search, and generative AI assistance. Essays produced with AI showed precise references but a strikingly uniform argument and structure. Notably, only 17% of AI-assisted students could accurately quote their own work later, while those in traditional and search groups demonstrated stronger recall. The study suggests AI might outsource cognitive effort, leaving comprehension behind.

As generative artificial intelligence (A.I.) rapidly transforms industries worldwide, universities are racing to adapt their computer science curricula to prepare students for a future where A.I., not humans, increasingly writes code and solves complex technical problems. The leading edge of this shift is highlighted in recent research and reporting from one of the United States’ top institutions, where computer science departments are re-evaluating not just what to teach, but how to equip students with the skills most relevant to the A.I. era (The New York Times).