#Boundaries

A recent psychology-focused roundup that lists five types of people to steer clear of — the constant critic, the manipulator, the drama-seeker, the “energy vampire” and the envious peer — has renewed conversations about how social ties shape mental health. The piece argues these relationship patterns are not just irritating, but can cause measurable harm to self-esteem, stress regulation and long-term wellbeing, making the case for proactive boundary-setting. For Thai readers grappling with rising rates of stress and loneliness, the advice to recognise and limit contact with corrosive personalities carries practical importance for family life, schools and workplaces. This report translates those psychological concepts into Thai social and policy context, explains why avoidance can be a health strategy, and offers concrete steps suited to local culture.

When dealing with difficult behavior from children who are not your own—such as the kids of close friends—many adults feel torn between compassion and the need to protect their own mental health. This familiar dilemma, highlighted in a recent advice column in The New York Times (nytimes.com), delves into how parents and caregivers can manage the emotional burden of spending time with other families’ children, particularly when those children’s experiences—such as divorce or emotional instability at home—manifest in unpredictable or rough behavior.

In living rooms across Thailand, a familiar scene unfolds with increasing frequency: exhausted parents finding themselves overwhelmed by visiting children whose behavior seems to clash dramatically with their own household expectations. Recent psychological research reveals that this challenge—managing difficult conduct from friends’ or relatives’ children while preserving family harmony—represents one of modern parenting’s most complex emotional negotiations, particularly in Thai society where cultural values of kreng jai and community interconnectedness create additional layers of sensitivity around setting necessary limits.

A recent advice column on Slate has ignited conversation about the complicated line between frugality and disregard for social norms, after a reader exposed their parents’ extreme cost-saving measures — including the covert use of a former family acquaintance’s paid streaming account. The article, published on 10 June 2025, underscores how attempts to save money can test the boundaries of etiquette, ethics, and family relationships in the modern world (Slate).

A new workplace movement dubbed “loud living” is gaining momentum among professionals disillusioned by the exhaustion of hustle culture, marking a shift from quietly disengaging at work to boldly asserting personal and professional boundaries. As seen in recent personal accounts and workplace research, “loud living” encourages not silent withdrawal but open, unapologetic communication about one’s needs, transforming conversations around work-life balance and employee well-being Business Insider.

In the aftermath of global disruptions brought by the COVID-19 pandemic, the boundary between work and personal life has become increasingly blurred. For Thai employees—often navigating long hours, hierarchical expectations, and multicultural contexts—the question of how to thrive in demanding workplaces has never been more urgent. The rise of “loud living” offers an alternative: instead of quietly quitting—doing the bare minimum to avoid burnout—workers are modeling clear, communicative self-advocacy, challenging old norms without sacrificing productivity Forbes, Psychology Today.