#Chatgpt

Hundreds of millions of people use ChatGPT and similar chatbots each week. (The Washington Post)
Researchers and clinicians now warn that intense use can trigger harmful beliefs in some users. (The Washington Post)

The concern has a name online. It is called “AI psychosis.” (The Washington Post)
Experts say the label is informal and not a clinical diagnosis. (The Washington Post)

The phenomenon matters to Thailand. The country already faces a heavy mental health burden. (World Health Organization)
Thai adolescents and young adults show particularly high rates of depression and suicidal behavior. (The Nation)

A professional editorial revision highlights how widespread AI chatbots, including ChatGPT, may affect Thai youth and communities. The goal is to present clear, concise journalism that informs families, educators, and policymakers about potential psychological risks while offering practical steps grounded in Thai context. Research to date is largely observational, but several clinicians report cases where intensive AI interaction coincides with reality distortion or psychiatric crises. Experts stress the need for systematic study and safer design rather than claiming a new medical diagnosis.

A new wave of research shows students now use generative AI as a routine tool.
The change has reshaped study habits and classroom expectations worldwide (The Atlantic).

The Atlantic reported that almost a full undergraduate cohort began college after ChatGPT launched in late 2022.
The article warned that campus life and teaching methods have shifted fast (The Atlantic).

A global academic survey confirms student uptake.
Researchers found 71 percent of surveyed higher-education students had used ChatGPT by early 2024 (PLOS ONE study).

The AI shift is redefining Thai higher education. In lecture halls and libraries, students and professors are adjusting to a generation for whom AI is a daily tool, not a novelty. This change promises to align Thailand’s universities with a global move toward tech-enabled learning and workplace readiness.

Lead with impact: A growing global trend shows that 71 percent of university students regularly use AI tools like ChatGPT. In Thailand, this quick adoption is reshaping study habits, evaluation methods, and the balance between coursework and work or family responsibilities. Data from Thai higher education studies indicate that English language tasks are a particular area where AI support is valued, reflecting Thailand’s increasingly international business landscape.

Thailand’s universities face an unprecedented transformation as artificial intelligence becomes as common as textbooks in lecture halls. What began as a technological curiosity has evolved into the defining characteristic of a generation that will reshape Thailand’s workforce and economy.

The Generation That Never Knew Life Without AI

Recent international research reveals a stunning reality: 71 percent of university students worldwide now use ChatGPT regularly, according to a comprehensive study spanning 109 countries and involving over 23,000 participants. This isn’t just a trend—it’s a fundamental shift that arrived faster than university administrators could adapt.

Millions of people worldwide are typing their anxieties into large language models — from ChatGPT to specialised therapy chatbots — and some of the earliest research and reporting suggests the trend is a symptom as much as a solution: a shift in how societies talk about distress has created demand for instant, judgement-free counsel, and the tech sector has raced to meet it. Recent investigative pieces and academic work warn that while AI can provide comfort and convenience, it can also reinforce harmful behaviours, reproduce stigma, and fail in safety-critical moments — raising urgent questions about regulation, clinical oversight and what it means to be cared for in a digital age Compact Magazine, The Guardian, Stanford News. For Thai readers, where access gaps, cultural stigma and a strong preference for relational support coexist, the rise of “therapy bots” offers both potential relief and new hazards; understanding the evidence and the trade-offs is critical to keeping people safe.

Across Thailand’s bustling cities and remote provinces, millions now confide their deepest anxieties to artificial intelligence, turning to ChatGPT and specialized therapy chatbots when traditional mental health services remain frustratingly out of reach. This digital phenomenon represents far more than technological convenience—it signals a fundamental shift in how Thai society approaches psychological distress, creating both unprecedented opportunities and alarming risks that demand immediate attention from healthcare leaders and policymakers.

The convergence of three powerful forces has created this unprecedented demand for AI-powered mental health support in Thailand. Rising awareness of psychological wellbeing, accelerated by COVID-19’s mental health impact, has normalized conversations about anxiety and depression among Thai families who historically maintained silence around emotional struggles. Simultaneously, severe shortages of qualified mental health professionals across the kingdom’s provinces have left countless citizens waiting months for appointments, while the promise of instant, judgment-free digital counseling offers immediate relief. Most significantly, the cultural appeal of anonymous support aligns perfectly with Thai preferences for preserving face while seeking help, making AI therapy particularly attractive to young people who might never enter a traditional clinic.

A groundbreaking parenting experiment conducted by a Swiss mother has triggered international debates about the future of child-rearing after she publicly credited artificial intelligence with revolutionizing her family’s daily management while raising profound questions about the appropriate role of technology in intimate family relationships. The 33-year-old Zurich resident’s viral confession that she feels like she’s “cheating at mom life” by using ChatGPT for everything from meal planning to tantrum management has sparked intense discussions among parenting experts worldwide about whether digital assistance represents liberation for overwhelmed parents or concerning erosion of authentic human connection in child development. Her bold embrace of AI co-parenting offers crucial insights for Thai families increasingly dependent on digital tools, particularly as rapid technological adoption intersects with traditional Thai values emphasizing warm family bonds and intergenerational wisdom sharing.

A Swiss mother has sparked intense discussion online and across parenting communities worldwide after revealing she uses ChatGPT—a prominent artificial intelligence tool—as a “third co-parent” in raising her 3-year-old daughter. Her unconventional approach, which recently went viral on TikTok and was featured on major media outlets such as Good Morning America, underscores the growing fascination and contentious debate over AI’s role in everyday family life (Independent).

The story, originating from Zurich, Switzerland, centers on a 33-year-old mother who openly credits ChatGPT with significantly easing her daily parenting load. “I feel like I’m cheating at mom life,” she admitted in a widely shared TikTok video, explaining how AI helped manage everything from meal planning and drafting grocery lists to navigating toddler tantrums and even supporting her own emotional well-being. Her candidness struck a chord with countless viewers, instantly fueling both admiration and skepticism about the technology’s reach into the home—and, by extension, the boundaries of modern parenting.

Groundbreaking research reveals unprecedented artificial intelligence penetration in scientific publication processes, with ChatGPT and advanced large language models fundamentally altering academic communication across global research communities. Nature Human Behaviour published definitive evidence on August 5, 2025, documenting how generative AI systems increasingly influence scholarly writing, particularly within computer science disciplines that reshape international research landscapes. According to Phys.org reporting, this technological transformation generates simultaneous excitement and apprehension among researchers worldwide, creating urgent questions about academic integrity, creative authenticity, and equitable access to AI-powered writing assistance.

A recent comprehensive study has revealed a dramatic uptick in the use of ChatGPT and similar large language models (LLMs) in drafting scientific papers, especially in the field of computer science—a trend that is rapidly reshaping how academic research is communicated worldwide. The findings, published in Nature Human Behaviour on August 5, 2025, offer the clearest evidence yet that generative artificial intelligence has begun to play a pivotal role in scientific writing, prompting both excitement and concern across the global research community (Phys.org).

In a digital age dominated by artificial intelligence, the way we speak and write is subtly, but steadily, shifting—thanks in large part to tools like ChatGPT. According to a new study by the Max Planck Institute for Human Development, English speakers have begun to incorporate certain AI-style phrasings, termed “GPT words,” into everyday communication at a remarkable pace over the past 18 months. The findings suggest that the boundary between human expression and machine-generated language is becoming less distinct, raising important questions for language, culture, and education in Thailand and around the world (Gizmodo).

A journalism educator’s recent firsthand account published in Business Insider is drawing new interest to the practical benefits and cautious optimism surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) in classrooms, offering a thoughtful look at how digital tools like ChatGPT can empower teachers while highlighting irreplaceable human aspects of education. The story, based on the experiences of a media ethics and English teacher in the United States, is sparking conversations among Thailand’s educators and policymakers on how best to harness AI’s potential for Thai schools and learners (Business Insider).

A growing wave of concern is sweeping through universities worldwide as advanced AI tools like ChatGPT and Claude become the latest frontline in academic dishonesty, raising fundamental questions about the future and value of higher education. Recent reporting in Vox’s “The Gray Area” podcast and a deeply researched feature by a New York Magazine writer has brought the issue into sharp focus, revealing widespread patterns of AI-enabled cheating, mounting faculty frustration, and institutional inertia that have left many educators and students disillusioned or resigned (Vox).

The explosive rise in popularity of AI-powered chatbots such as ChatGPT is sparking rigorous new research into how these digital assistants may be fundamentally altering the way our brains work. As Thai students, professionals, and families increasingly turn to generative AI for tasks ranging from essay writing to bedtime stories, urgent questions are emerging about whether this convenience comes with hidden cognitive costs.

For Thais who have rapidly adopted generative AI in education and everyday life, this inquiry has special relevance. Thailand’s government and universities have promoted digital literacy and the integration of AI in classrooms, aiming to boost competitiveness in the regional economy. Yet concerns are growing: is this powerful technology sharpening our minds, or is it making us passive consumers of machine-generated knowledge?

A new wave of AI chatbots, including ChatGPT, is reshaping study habits, work routines, and creative processes across Thailand. As students, professionals, and families increasingly turn to generative AI for essays and brainstorming, concerns rise about long-term effects on critical thinking and originality.

Thailand has championed digital literacy and AI in classrooms to boost regional competitiveness. Yet educators and cultural observers warn of hidden costs. Is this technology sharpening minds or promoting dependence on machine guidance?

Millions globally have embraced ChatGPT and similar AI chatbots for everything from homework help to late-night life advice. But a growing body of evidence suggests that, for some people living with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), these digital companions can become problematic—fueling a cycle of compulsive questioning and reinforcing unhealthy patterns that may worsen their symptoms. Recent reporting by Vox has ignited international discussion about this emerging challenge, prompting Thai mental health professionals and digital wellbeing advocates to examine the Thai context and consider what safeguards might help local users maintain balance in an increasingly AI-driven world (Vox).

A growing global concern is emerging around severe mental health episodes linked to prolonged interactions with AI chatbots. In Thailand, mental health professionals are examining how these risks could affect vulnerable populations and the broader digital landscape in Asia.

Thailand has embraced digital technology, with widespread internet and smartphone use. Many Thais engage with AI chatbots for language learning, business support, and entertainment. The rapid shift toward digital tools, accelerated by the COVID-19 era, brings new psychological considerations. The term “ChatGPT psychosis” underscores how AI interactions may interact with individual vulnerabilities, potentially amplifying distress or delusional thinking.

A recent wave of psychiatric hospitalizations in the United States and elsewhere has drawn attention to a disturbing new phenomenon: individuals experiencing a severe break with reality—a condition some psychiatrists and families are calling “ChatGPT psychosis”—after extended, intense interactions with artificial intelligence chatbots. As stories surface of people spiraling into delusional thinking, family breakdown, job loss, and even involuntary psychiatric committal linked to their use of conversational bots like ChatGPT, Thai mental health professionals and policymakers are taking note of the risks these digital tools might pose for vulnerable populations in Thailand and across Asia.

A growing chorus warns that AI tools like ChatGPT erode academic integrity. Yet student voices tell a more nuanced story: AI is being embraced as a pragmatic response to disrupted education, resource constraints, and post-pandemic realities. Rather than laziness, many students see AI as a tool to navigate upheaval and maintain momentum in higher education, especially as they juggle part-time work and financial pressures.

The UK experience mirrors Thailand’s concerns: educators and policymakers grapple with assessment fairness, digital learning, and AI ethics. A recent student-led commentary argues that learners are not abandoning study; they are struggling to keep pace with changing expectations and uneven evaluation methods. For Thai universities, these insights underscore the urgency of clear AI guidelines, stable assessments, and equitable access to digital resources.

A growing number of real-world psychiatric crises are being linked to long, emotionally intense conversations with generative AI chatbots, notably ChatGPT. This trend is sparking international concern and urgent debates about the mental health risks of unregulated artificial intelligence. In Europe and the United States, reports describe users developing paranoid beliefs, grandiose thinking, or detachment from reality after sustained engagement with AI. These cases are increasingly referred to as “ChatGPT psychosis,” highlighting a potential harm for vulnerable individuals.

As artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT become increasingly integrated into education systems worldwide, much of the narrative has focused on a supposed crisis of academic integrity. Critics warn of students cheating en masse, forfeiting genuine learning, and entering the workforce less prepared than their predecessors. Yet, first-hand student perspectives reveal a more nuanced reality: the rapid embrace of AI in higher education is less about laziness and more about adapting to systemic upheaval, resource scarcity, and the lingering aftershocks of the Covid-19 pandemic (The Guardian).

A surge in real-world psychiatric crises has been linked to deep and obsessive engagement with generative AI chatbots, most notably ChatGPT, sparking international concern and urgent debates about the mental health dangers of unregulated artificial intelligence. Recent reports from the US and Europe expose a distressing trend: some users, after extended and emotionally intense interactions with AI, descend into paranoid delusions, grandiose thinking, and catastrophic breaks from reality—phenomena increasingly referred to as “ChatGPT psychosis” [Futurism; TheBrink.me; Psychology Today].

AI chatbots are emerging as a potential emotional lifeline for people seeking support, with new research showing more individuals turning to artificial intelligence for comfort traditionally sought from human therapists. While this offers faster, around-the-clock access, experts warn about privacy risks and the limits of AI as a substitute for professional care. The Thai context is especially salient as access to mental health services remains uneven and cultural factors influence how people seek help.