#ChatGPT

Hundreds of millions of people use ChatGPT and similar chatbots each week. (The Washington Post)
Researchers and clinicians now warn that intense use can trigger harmful beliefs in some users. (The Washington Post)

The concern has a name online. It is called “AI psychosis.” (The Washington Post)
Experts say the label is informal and not a clinical diagnosis. (The Washington Post)

The phenomenon matters to Thailand. The country already faces a heavy mental health burden. (World Health Organization)
Thai adolescents and young adults show particularly high rates of depression and suicidal behavior. (The Nation)

A new wave of research shows students now use generative AI as a routine tool.
The change has reshaped study habits and classroom expectations worldwide (The Atlantic).

The Atlantic reported that almost a full undergraduate cohort began college after ChatGPT launched in late 2022.
The article warned that campus life and teaching methods have shifted fast (The Atlantic).

A global academic survey confirms student uptake.
Researchers found 71 percent of surveyed higher-education students had used ChatGPT by early 2024 (PLOS ONE study).

Thailand’s universities face an unprecedented transformation as artificial intelligence becomes as common as textbooks in lecture halls. What began as a technological curiosity has evolved into the defining characteristic of a generation that will reshape Thailand’s workforce and economy.

The Generation That Never Knew Life Without AI

Recent international research reveals a stunning reality: 71 percent of university students worldwide now use ChatGPT regularly, according to a comprehensive study spanning 109 countries and involving over 23,000 participants. This isn’t just a trend—it’s a fundamental shift that arrived faster than university administrators could adapt.

Millions of people worldwide are typing their anxieties into large language models — from ChatGPT to specialised therapy chatbots — and some of the earliest research and reporting suggests the trend is a symptom as much as a solution: a shift in how societies talk about distress has created demand for instant, judgement-free counsel, and the tech sector has raced to meet it. Recent investigative pieces and academic work warn that while AI can provide comfort and convenience, it can also reinforce harmful behaviours, reproduce stigma, and fail in safety-critical moments — raising urgent questions about regulation, clinical oversight and what it means to be cared for in a digital age Compact Magazine, The Guardian, Stanford News. For Thai readers, where access gaps, cultural stigma and a strong preference for relational support coexist, the rise of “therapy bots” offers both potential relief and new hazards; understanding the evidence and the trade-offs is critical to keeping people safe.

Across Thailand’s bustling cities and remote provinces, millions now confide their deepest anxieties to artificial intelligence, turning to ChatGPT and specialized therapy chatbots when traditional mental health services remain frustratingly out of reach. This digital phenomenon represents far more than technological convenience—it signals a fundamental shift in how Thai society approaches psychological distress, creating both unprecedented opportunities and alarming risks that demand immediate attention from healthcare leaders and policymakers.

The convergence of three powerful forces has created this unprecedented demand for AI-powered mental health support in Thailand. Rising awareness of psychological wellbeing, accelerated by COVID-19’s mental health impact, has normalized conversations about anxiety and depression among Thai families who historically maintained silence around emotional struggles. Simultaneously, severe shortages of qualified mental health professionals across the kingdom’s provinces have left countless citizens waiting months for appointments, while the promise of instant, judgment-free digital counseling offers immediate relief. Most significantly, the cultural appeal of anonymous support aligns perfectly with Thai preferences for preserving face while seeking help, making AI therapy particularly attractive to young people who might never enter a traditional clinic.

A groundbreaking parenting experiment conducted by a Swiss mother has triggered international debates about the future of child-rearing after she publicly credited artificial intelligence with revolutionizing her family’s daily management while raising profound questions about the appropriate role of technology in intimate family relationships. The 33-year-old Zurich resident’s viral confession that she feels like she’s “cheating at mom life” by using ChatGPT for everything from meal planning to tantrum management has sparked intense discussions among parenting experts worldwide about whether digital assistance represents liberation for overwhelmed parents or concerning erosion of authentic human connection in child development. Her bold embrace of AI co-parenting offers crucial insights for Thai families increasingly dependent on digital tools, particularly as rapid technological adoption intersects with traditional Thai values emphasizing warm family bonds and intergenerational wisdom sharing.

A Swiss mother has sparked intense discussion online and across parenting communities worldwide after revealing she uses ChatGPT—a prominent artificial intelligence tool—as a “third co-parent” in raising her 3-year-old daughter. Her unconventional approach, which recently went viral on TikTok and was featured on major media outlets such as Good Morning America, underscores the growing fascination and contentious debate over AI’s role in everyday family life (Independent).

The story, originating from Zurich, Switzerland, centers on a 33-year-old mother who openly credits ChatGPT with significantly easing her daily parenting load. “I feel like I’m cheating at mom life,” she admitted in a widely shared TikTok video, explaining how AI helped manage everything from meal planning and drafting grocery lists to navigating toddler tantrums and even supporting her own emotional well-being. Her candidness struck a chord with countless viewers, instantly fueling both admiration and skepticism about the technology’s reach into the home—and, by extension, the boundaries of modern parenting.

Groundbreaking research reveals unprecedented artificial intelligence penetration in scientific publication processes, with ChatGPT and advanced large language models fundamentally altering academic communication across global research communities. Nature Human Behaviour published definitive evidence on August 5, 2025, documenting how generative AI systems increasingly influence scholarly writing, particularly within computer science disciplines that reshape international research landscapes. According to Phys.org reporting, this technological transformation generates simultaneous excitement and apprehension among researchers worldwide, creating urgent questions about academic integrity, creative authenticity, and equitable access to AI-powered writing assistance.

A recent comprehensive study has revealed a dramatic uptick in the use of ChatGPT and similar large language models (LLMs) in drafting scientific papers, especially in the field of computer science—a trend that is rapidly reshaping how academic research is communicated worldwide. The findings, published in Nature Human Behaviour on August 5, 2025, offer the clearest evidence yet that generative artificial intelligence has begun to play a pivotal role in scientific writing, prompting both excitement and concern across the global research community (Phys.org).

In a digital age dominated by artificial intelligence, the way we speak and write is subtly, but steadily, shifting—thanks in large part to tools like ChatGPT. According to a new study by the Max Planck Institute for Human Development, English speakers have begun to incorporate certain AI-style phrasings, termed “GPT words,” into everyday communication at a remarkable pace over the past 18 months. The findings suggest that the boundary between human expression and machine-generated language is becoming less distinct, raising important questions for language, culture, and education in Thailand and around the world (Gizmodo).

A journalism educator’s recent firsthand account published in Business Insider is drawing new interest to the practical benefits and cautious optimism surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) in classrooms, offering a thoughtful look at how digital tools like ChatGPT can empower teachers while highlighting irreplaceable human aspects of education. The story, based on the experiences of a media ethics and English teacher in the United States, is sparking conversations among Thailand’s educators and policymakers on how best to harness AI’s potential for Thai schools and learners (Business Insider).

A growing wave of concern is sweeping through universities worldwide as advanced AI tools like ChatGPT and Claude become the latest frontline in academic dishonesty, raising fundamental questions about the future and value of higher education. Recent reporting in Vox’s “The Gray Area” podcast and a deeply researched feature by a New York Magazine writer has brought the issue into sharp focus, revealing widespread patterns of AI-enabled cheating, mounting faculty frustration, and institutional inertia that have left many educators and students disillusioned or resigned (Vox).

The explosive rise in popularity of AI-powered chatbots such as ChatGPT is sparking rigorous new research into how these digital assistants may be fundamentally altering the way our brains work. As Thai students, professionals, and families increasingly turn to generative AI for tasks ranging from essay writing to bedtime stories, urgent questions are emerging about whether this convenience comes with hidden cognitive costs.

For Thais who have rapidly adopted generative AI in education and everyday life, this inquiry has special relevance. Thailand’s government and universities have promoted digital literacy and the integration of AI in classrooms, aiming to boost competitiveness in the regional economy. Yet concerns are growing: is this powerful technology sharpening our minds, or is it making us passive consumers of machine-generated knowledge?

Millions globally have embraced ChatGPT and similar AI chatbots for everything from homework help to late-night life advice. But a growing body of evidence suggests that, for some people living with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), these digital companions can become problematic—fueling a cycle of compulsive questioning and reinforcing unhealthy patterns that may worsen their symptoms. Recent reporting by Vox has ignited international discussion about this emerging challenge, prompting Thai mental health professionals and digital wellbeing advocates to examine the Thai context and consider what safeguards might help local users maintain balance in an increasingly AI-driven world (Vox).

A recent wave of psychiatric hospitalizations in the United States and elsewhere has drawn attention to a disturbing new phenomenon: individuals experiencing a severe break with reality—a condition some psychiatrists and families are calling “ChatGPT psychosis”—after extended, intense interactions with artificial intelligence chatbots. As stories surface of people spiraling into delusional thinking, family breakdown, job loss, and even involuntary psychiatric committal linked to their use of conversational bots like ChatGPT, Thai mental health professionals and policymakers are taking note of the risks these digital tools might pose for vulnerable populations in Thailand and across Asia.

As artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT become increasingly integrated into education systems worldwide, much of the narrative has focused on a supposed crisis of academic integrity. Critics warn of students cheating en masse, forfeiting genuine learning, and entering the workforce less prepared than their predecessors. Yet, first-hand student perspectives reveal a more nuanced reality: the rapid embrace of AI in higher education is less about laziness and more about adapting to systemic upheaval, resource scarcity, and the lingering aftershocks of the Covid-19 pandemic (The Guardian).

A surge in real-world psychiatric crises has been linked to deep and obsessive engagement with generative AI chatbots, most notably ChatGPT, sparking international concern and urgent debates about the mental health dangers of unregulated artificial intelligence. Recent reports from the US and Europe expose a distressing trend: some users, after extended and emotionally intense interactions with AI, descend into paranoid delusions, grandiose thinking, and catastrophic breaks from reality—phenomena increasingly referred to as “ChatGPT psychosis” [Futurism; TheBrink.me; Psychology Today].

ChatGPT, a widely used generative AI chatbot, is becoming an emotional lifeline for individuals seeking support, with new research indicating a record number of people are turning to artificial intelligence for comfort traditionally sought from human therapists. The rapid rise in AI’s role as a confidant is stirring both hope and concern among mental health experts and policymakers worldwide — and it holds unique implications for Thailand, where access to mental healthcare remains a societal challenge.

California’s public colleges and universities are spending millions on high-tech solutions to catch plagiarism and artificial intelligence (AI) misuse, but mounting evidence reveals these investments may be rife with technological blind spots, privacy risks, and questionable educational value. As higher education worldwide faces a new era of “AI arms race,” the experience of the California system demonstrates how quick fixes may fall short, fueling new debates that resonate in classrooms from Bangkok to Berkeley.

Artificial intelligence is reshaping the teaching profession on a global scale, as tools like ChatGPT find new roles in classrooms ranging from lesson planning to student engagement. Recent developments, highlighted by a survey released by Gallup and the Walton Family Foundation, suggest that six out of ten US K-12 public school teachers now incorporate AI tools into their daily work, with the trend rapidly accelerating among high school instructors and early-career educators. As debates about AI’s place in education intensify, both the benefits and challenges of these technologies are becoming increasingly relevant for Thai teachers, students, and policymakers.

A new study from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has ignited debate over the cognitive impact of AI writing tools like ChatGPT, revealing that their use significantly reduces brain activity and leads to less creative, more “soulless” work. The findings, published in June 2025, raise questions over the future role of artificial intelligence in education, as policymakers and educators across the world—including in Thailand—navigate the integration of new technologies in the classroom.

Artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT are renowned for their ability to generate a rapid torrent of original ideas—but new research suggests these machine-generated responses may be quietly steering humans toward conformity, raising important questions for educators, businesses, and policymakers in Thailand and around the world. Recent findings reported by multiple outlets, including a widely cited summary on Axios, reveal that while AI can help people brainstorm ideas faster and at greater volume, those ideas tend to be far too similar, limiting the diversity of creative thought.

A significant academic integrity scandal has erupted at Yale University after “clear evidence of AI usage” was flagged in roughly one-third of submissions in a popular computer science course, raising urgent questions on the reliability of AI-detection and the evolving role of artificial intelligence in education. Over 150 students were enrolled in Computer Science 223 (“Data Structures and Programming Techniques”) when students and faculty alike were thrust into the center of a debate that echoes far beyond Yale’s campus.

A rapidly escalating wave of academic dishonesty has gripped universities worldwide, with a recent UK study exposing a dramatic rise in students caught cheating with artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT. The findings, which reveal nearly 7,000 proven cases of AI-facilitated cheating between 2023 and 2024, spotlight an urgent challenge for educators not just in the UK but across the globe, including Thailand. Experts warn these figures are likely just the “tip of the iceberg,” suggesting that the true scope of technology-driven misconduct is far greater and largely undetected—potentially transforming how societies view and manage academic integrity (The Guardian).