Rethinking psychopathy: framing brain-first narratives for Thai readers with nuance and compassion
Emerging research questions the idea that psychopathy is driven by clear brain abnormalities. A growing body of work suggests that much of the brain-connection narrative in academia and media reflects selective reporting and sensational framing rather than robust science. For Thai courts, health services, and educators, this matters for how individuals labeled as psychopaths are understood and responded to.
Since 2000, neuroimaging tools have allowed researchers to study the brains of people diagnosed with psychopathy. Across numerous structural MRI studies, most findings show no reliable differences in brain structure between psychopaths and non-psychopaths. A comprehensive synthesis of dozens of MRI studies found that about two-thirds reported null results, and the amygdala—the most-cited region—often showed no clear differences in many cases. These patterns invite caution about attributing antisocial traits to biology alone. When significant findings appear, factors such as substance use, medications, or prior head injuries may influence results rather than the traits themselves, according to research summaries.