#Criticalthinking

A wave of fresh scientific insight is reshaping how educators, parents, and society at large understand intelligence—not as a fixed trait, but as an adaptable, multi-dimensional capacity that can be nurtured across a person’s lifetime. Drawing from recent research published in Psychology Today and the seminal work “Tenacity in Children,” experts now argue that intelligence, far from being etched in stone, is instead an evolving skill—a product of both genetic wiring and environmental influences—that can be cultivated through focused strategies in school and home environments (Psychology Today).

Recent psychology hints that warmth, honesty, and compassion are not always the deciding factors in how people judge leaders. Emotional appeal can be just as persuasive, or even more so, than factual accuracy or moral consistency. For Thai readers, this has practical implications as public figures rely on energy and storytelling to sustain support.

Trust and empathy were long considered core leadership traits. Yet contemporary research indicates that affective impact often sways opinions, shaping everything from workplace dynamics to voter choices. In Thai contexts, charismatic speakers—whether in politics, media, or community groups—can build loyal followings even when their statements lack rigor. This pattern mirrors a global trend toward prioritizing personal style and emotional resonance over clear facts.

Affect overrules virtue—recent psychological research is challenging the long-standing belief that honesty, warmth, and compassion are universally valued traits in leaders and individuals, showing that emotional appeal can be equally, if not more, persuasive. This finding holds sobering lessons for Thai society and global democracies, as new evidence reveals why these virtues sometimes take a back seat to style, energy, and emotional resonance.

For years, trustworthiness and empathy were seen as essential personal qualities, especially in politics and public life. According to recent scholarly work such as that cited by Psychology Today, qualities like honesty and caring once formed the bedrock of how leaders were judged and supported, shaping everything from workplace relationships to voter decisions (psychologytoday.com). However, as new evidence and expert commentary suggest, affective—or emotional—impact now increasingly sways opinions, sometimes eclipsing the importance of fact-checking and moral consistency.

Unlearning, a concept once relegated to the margins of educational theory and neuroscience, is taking center stage in 2025 as new research urges individuals and institutions to rethink how knowledge is acquired, updated, and, crucially, discarded. As global education systems and workforces grapple with fast-evolving information landscapes, being able to let go of outdated ideas is no longer a luxury—it’s a necessity for personal growth and organizational innovation (Psychology Today; WDHB).

Unlearning is moving from fringe theory to a central priority in 2025, as new research urges both individuals and institutions to reevaluate not just what we learn but what we discard. In fast-changing information landscapes, letting go of outdated ideas is essential for personal growth and organizational innovation, a message increasingly echoed by Thai educators and policymakers.

In Thailand, where reforms in education and workforce development are linked to national progress, the call to “learn to unlearn” resonates deeply. Data from leading research teams shows that unlearning goes beyond forgetting; it means consciously challenging beliefs that are incomplete, outdated, or based on flawed frameworks. The process requires humility and a tolerance for discomfort—qualities that can be hard to cultivate in environments that prize tradition and consistency.

As artificial intelligence floods our daily lives with rapid answers at the tap of a screen, a new wave of research is raising urgent questions: Is our dependence on instant knowledge in fact undermining the very wisdom that makes us human? A recent analysis published in Psychology Today offers a sobering examination of what we lose when we trade reflection for immediacy—and what Thai society must do to reclaim the deep thinking that underpins both personal and collective growth (Psychology Today).

A new wave of research questions whether faster answers truly sharpen thinking. An analysis in Psychology Today argues that immediacy may erode deliberate reflection and suggests ways Thai society can reclaim thoughtful, growth-oriented thinking for individuals and communities.

Generative AI now delivers detailed responses on nearly every topic, transforming not just how we access information but how we feel, relate, and reason. Patience, vulnerability, and the slow maturation of ideas—once central to wisdom—face disruption as AI favors quick fixes and a sense of control that may mask shallow insight. Experts warn that time spent with uncertainty is being traded for instant gratification, altering a core aspect of the human experience.

Miami’s public schools have embarked on the largest artificial intelligence (A.I.) classroom rollout in U.S. history, equipping over 105,000 high school students with Google’s Gemini chatbot and training more than 1,000 educators on cutting-edge A.I. tools. In a stunning reversal from initial bans on classroom chatbots, leaders in the nation’s third-largest school district say this rapid adoption is crucial to readying students for a future dominated by digital intelligence—an approach that could have profound implications for education reform in Thailand and beyond (NY Times).

A large-scale AI classroom rollout is reshaping how students learn. In Miami, more than 105,000 high school students now use Google’s Gemini chatbot, with over 1,000 teachers trained in AI tools. After an initial pause on classroom chatbots, district leaders argue that careful, supervised use is essential to prepare students for a future shaped by digital intelligence. The experience offers both inspiration and caution for Thailand as it strengthens its own education reforms.

A wave of fresh psychology research is probing a question that resonates with Thai readers: why do many people cling to easy answers when life’s problems demand more complex solutions? The impulse toward simplicity is universal, yet it matters more in an era of social media, misinformation, and rapid online debates. This has clear implications for teachers, health professionals, and cultural leaders across Thailand.

Why it matters for Thailand: Thais, like people worldwide, face information overload. From the pandemic to economic shifts and debates over education reform and digital health advice, the urge for concise explanations—even when they’re not accurate—can shape decisions. Belief in medical quick fixes or oversimplified educational solutions may offer a sense of certainty, yet also breed misunderstanding and resistance to evidence-based approaches.

A fresh wave of psychological research is shedding light on a question deeply relevant to modern Thai society: why do so many of us gravitate toward easy answers, even when life’s problems demand complex solutions? While the urge for simplicity is universal, the issue is amplified in an era dominated by social media, misinformation, and rapid-fire online debates—raising concerns for educators, health professionals, and cultural leaders across Thailand.

This news matters because Thais, like people worldwide, are increasingly confronted by overwhelming streams of information. From the pandemic to economic uncertainty, and from debates over education reform to navigating digital health advice, the temptation to latch onto clear, concise explanations—regardless of their accuracy—can have profound consequences. For instance, believing in medical quick fixes or simplistic educational remedies may foster decisiveness but also perpetuate misunderstanding and resistance to evidence-based solutions.

A surge of new research is challenging long-held beliefs about how parenting shapes us as adults. In his book, Rethinking Psychology: Finding Meaning in Misconceptions, renowned psychologist Michael W. Eysenck highlights that genetics may play a larger role in adult personality than parenting styles. The Times of India outlines these findings, signaling important conversations for Thai families and educators accustomed to linking nurture with lifelong temperament and mental health.

In Thai culture, parenting often centers on discipline, moral guidance, and constant presence, values reinforced in homes, schools, and Buddhist temples. Eysenck’s synthesis draws on international studies to suggest that genetic inheritance accounts for a greater share of adult personality differences than previously recognized. While parental love and guidance remain essential for security and social skills, core traits such as extraversion, emotional stability, and openness may be rooted more in DNA than in parenting methods.

A wave of new research is overturning long-held beliefs about the power of parenting in shaping who we become as adults, with renowned psychologist Michael W. Eysenck’s latest book, “Rethinking Psychology: Finding Meaning in Misconceptions,” spotlighting the ways genetics, more than parenting styles, influence adult personalities. The findings, detailed in a recent report by the Times of India, are likely to spark important conversations in Thai families and among educators who have long assumed nurturing—rather than nature—was the primary driver of children’s lifelong temperaments and mental health Times of India.

The Kalama Sutta, known in Thai as กาลามสูตร, is among the Buddha’s most influential teachings. It urges people to assess information and beliefs rather than blindly accepting them. For Thai high school students immersed in a flood of information—from social media, classrooms, and peers—this teaching remains essential.

Why is this ancient principle still relevant in modern Thailand? At its core, the Kalama Sutta teaches how to think, not what to think. The Buddha delivered this guidance to a community confused by contradictory claims, asking whom to trust. Rather than prescribing a single path, the sutta offers ten cautions against uncritical acceptance. It advises examining beliefs by their outcomes: if they harm, reject them; if they lead to good and happiness, consider adopting them.

The Kalama Sutta, or “กาลามสูตร” in Thai, stands as one of the most influential teachings by the Buddha, known for encouraging people not to blindly believe in information or beliefs without thoughtful consideration. For Thai high school students growing up in a world of overwhelming information—on social media, in the classroom, and from peers—understanding the Kalama Sutta is both empowering and essential.

Why does this ancient Buddhist principle remain relevant in modern Thailand? At its heart, the Kalama Sutta (as explained in sources such as Wikipedia and multiple other Thai dharma platforms) teaches us how to think, not what to think. The Buddha gave this teaching to the Kalama people, who were confused by contradictory spiritual teachers. Participating youth of the time wondered: “Whom should we believe?”

The phrase “Real Buddhism let you ask questions, not dictate answers” has gained resonance both in global discussions about spirituality and within Thailand, Buddhism’s only officially recognized nation-wide religion. At first glance, this provocative statement challenges many assumptions about tradition, faith, and authority. Its significance runs deeper than mere semantics—it gestures toward what some see as the essential, originally intended nature of Buddhist practice and philosophy, a perspective highly relevant for Thai readers living in a society where Buddhism often intersects with culture, education, and public life.

The claim that “Real Buddhism lets you ask questions, not dictate answers” has gained traction worldwide and resonates deeply in Thailand, where Buddhism is the national faith. The statement challenges assumptions about tradition, authority, and belief. It points to an authentic spirit of Buddhist practice—one that Thai readers recognize in a society where faith intersects with education, culture, and public life.

To understand the idea, we should look to the Buddha’s era, when inquiry was welcomed. Buddhist texts show a different approach from many faiths that emphasize fixed doctrine. The Kalama Sutta, cited by Thai teachers, records the Buddha advising a village audience: do not rely on hearsay, tradition, or scripture alone. Instead, test and verify what is wholesome for yourself. A Bangkok Dhamma teacher notes that Buddhism invites doubt, experimentation, and direct experience—never blind faith. Seen this way, real Buddhism becomes a journey of inquiry and discovery.

Confirmation bias, a deeply rooted psychological phenomenon, explains why we tend to focus on information that agrees with our pre-existing beliefs and ignore or discredit evidence that challenges them. In everyday life, this invisible force shapes not only our individual decisions but also the way Thai society interprets news, politics, and even the stories we tell ourselves about our health and well-being. The significance of understanding confirmation bias is becoming increasingly clear in an era where information is abundant but polarization is rising, both globally and in Thailand.

The Dunning-Kruger Effect is a psychological phenomenon where people with limited knowledge or skill in a particular area often overestimate their own abilities, while those who are more competent may actually underestimate themselves. This effect, first identified by researchers at Cornell University in 1999, has become a widely discussed topic in psychology, workplace training, and even daily Thai culture, as it sheds light on why some individuals appear inexplicably confident about topics they barely understand, while experts may downplay their own expertise [thestandard.co], [themomentum.co], [thaipublica.org].

Confirmation bias makes people seek and remember information that fits their preconceptions, while discounting evidence that contradicts them. For Thai audiences, this invisible force shapes how we read health guidance, politics, and daily news in a crowded information landscape. Understanding it is crucial as Thailand embraces rapid digital change and growing polarization.

At a basic level, confirmation bias means we look for supporting evidence, interpret ambiguous data to fit our views, and recall memories that reinforce our beliefs. Decades of research show the brain prioritizes consistency over objective truth, influencing judgments in health, law, and public discourse. In fast-moving information environments, these tendencies can distort how we interpret new health advisories or political developments.

A well-documented cognitive bias, the Dunning-Kruger Effect, shows that people with limited knowledge in a area often overestimate their competence, while true experts may underestimate their mastery. First described in 1999 by researchers at a major U.S. university, this phenomenon now informs discussions in psychology, education, workplaces, and everyday life in Thailand. It helps explain why some individuals appear overly confident about topics they barely understand, while experts may downplay their expertise.

A wave of neuroscience research is shedding fresh light on why people follow orders, even when those directions clash with personal morals. The impulse to comply is rooted in brain function and cultural norms, researchers say, with implications for classrooms, workplaces, and public health in Thailand.

The core question connects authority, social pressure, and individual conscience. The topic is familiar to many Thais, where respect for elders, teachers, and hierarchical structures influence daily decisions. Modern neuroscience is starting to identify brain mechanisms behind obedience. When people receive commands from those in power, activity in brain regions tied to moral judgment and self-agency often decreases. Neuroscientist Dr. Micah Edelson notes that individuals may “offload” responsibility when obeying orders, which dampens personal accountability. The area most affected is the anterior cingulate cortex, linked to empathy and self-control.

A recent wave of research in neuroscience is shedding fresh light on a question as old as society itself: Why do people obey authority, even when it conflicts with their own morals? The drive to follow orders is deeply rooted in both our brains and cultures, according to leading scientists exploring the intersection of compliance and control. These findings, highlighted in a discussion hosted by Dr. Michael Shermer on Skeptic.com, carry profound implications for Thai society—spanning education, workplace hierarchies, and even public health.

A major new study has brought to light an enduring problem both globally and in Thailand: despite the growing influence of neuroscience in education, persistent misconceptions—so-called “neuromyths”—continue to misinform the way teachers, especially those in early childhood education, understand and apply brain science in their classrooms. The research, published on April 22, 2025, surveyed over 520 early childhood educators in Australia, revealing that many still believe debunked ideas, such as the necessity of catering to “learning styles” or the notion that students are either “left-brained” or “right-brained” thinkers. Experts warn these myths are not just harmless misunderstandings, but may actively undermine effective teaching and learning—an issue with clear implications for Thai educators and policymakers ScienceAlert.