#Criticalthinking

New neuroscience findings are shedding light on why people often comply with orders that conflict with their conscience. This reporting synthesizes recent insights from a Skeptic magazine feature on the neuroscience of compliance, translated for Thai readers. The aim is to understand how brain processes and social pressures shape obedience, and what individuals and communities can do to foster ethical autonomy.

From classrooms to workplaces, obedience influences Thai society in meaningful ways. The Thai concept of greng jai—showing respect and avoiding offense—can reinforce deference to authority. This makes understanding the science of compliance especially relevant for Thai students, employees, and citizens alike. Debates around hazing in universities or organizational misconduct illustrate how uncritical obedience can contribute to harmful outcomes. As Thailand modernizes, there is growing emphasis on encouraging people to question authority when appropriate.

A new international study highlights a persistent issue in education: despite growing interest in brain science, many teachers still cling to neuromyths that distort how they teach. The research, published in 2025, surveyed more than 520 early childhood educators in Australia. It found that while some myths have faded, others persist, such as the belief in fixed “learning styles” or the idea that students are strictly left-brained or right-brained. Experts warn these misconceptions can hinder effective teaching and learning, with clear implications for Thailand’s educators and policymakers.

Why do people so often comply with authority—even when orders contradict their conscience? New neuroscience research is beginning to provide concrete answers to this age-old question, illuminating the brain mechanisms that drive obedience and the social pressures that can make compliance nearly automatic. Drawing upon insights from the recent feature, “Why We Follow Orders: The Neuroscience of Compliance and Control” in Skeptic magazine, this report examines what scientists have uncovered, why these findings matter in everyday Thai life, and what we can do to foster greater ethical autonomy.

In an era of ongoing social, political, and workplace challenges where authority and individual will often collide, understanding why people obey orders is more relevant than ever for Thai society. Recent discussions sparked by “Why We Follow Orders: The Neuroscience of Compliance and Control,” a feature on the Michael Shermer Show, have brought new research to the public eye, shedding light on the brain mechanisms and situational dynamics that drive human compliance. This emerging field offers crucial lessons not only for authorities and educators but also for anyone navigating the fine line between following instructions and maintaining personal agency.

Obedience to authority shapes many aspects of Thai life—from classrooms and workplaces to public safety. A fresh wave of research highlights why people tend to follow commands, and what this means for personal agency in a modern Thai context. The discussion stems from “Why We Follow Orders: The Neuroscience of Compliance and Control,” a feature featured on the Michael Shermer Show, which translates cutting-edge science into practical insights for everyday life.