#Culturalchange

As parenting in the digital age becomes increasingly entangled with technology, a new book challenges parents not to reject digital tools, but to rethink their relationship with them in ways that serve both themselves and their communities. Amanda Hess’s “Second Life: Having a Child in the Digital Age,” recently discussed in Mother Jones, offers an incisive examination of the powerful hold technology exerts on modern parenting, and ultimately proposes a gentler, more honest approach to navigating the inevitable blend of screens, apps, and algorithms that now accompany family life (Mother Jones).

A new book invites parents to rethink their relationship with digital tools rather than abandon them. Amanda Hess’s Second Life: Having a Child in the Digital Age examines how technology already shapes modern parenting and suggests a gentler, more honest approach to navigating screens, apps, and algorithms that accompany family life. The discussion, highlighted in Mother Jones, emphasizes how digital life can support communities when used with intention rather than as a source of constant comparison.

A recent advice column published in Slate has ignited a nationwide conversation on adolescent privacy, focusing on the contentious issue of whether children and teens should be permitted to lock their bedroom doors at home. The column, titled “My Husband Doesn’t Want to Allow Our Daughter to Lock Her Door. But I Think She Might Have a Good Reason,” depicts a family conflict where parental attitudes about privacy and safety clash, raising complex questions about child development and family dynamics.

A recent advice column in Slate has sparked a nationwide discussion about adolescent privacy and whether children should be allowed to lock their bedroom doors. Titled “My Husband Doesn’t Want to Allow Our Daughter to Lock Her Door. But I Think She Might Have a Good Reason,” the piece depicts a family conflict over privacy, safety, and growing independence. It raises questions about child development and how families navigate evolving dynamics.

As global efforts intensify to destigmatize men’s sexual health, the latest research and advocacy underscore the urgent need for open dialogue—challenging outdated expectations and transforming silent suffering into collective well-being. This movement toward normalization is rapidly gaining ground, with far-reaching implications for Thai society where traditional views on masculinity persist.

Men’s health has long encompassed more than just the physical; mental and emotional well-being are increasingly recognized as critical. Yet, across the world, men statistically have a shorter life expectancy than women due in large part to heart disease, diabetes, mental health disorders, and cancer, with underlying causes being intertwined lifestyle choices and social barriers. Reluctance among men to seek preventative care or address issues early is often tied not only to the stigma of vulnerability, but also misinformation and societal attitudes that equate open discussion with weakness (Life & Style, 2025).

A global push to destigmatize men’s sexual health is gaining momentum in Thailand, driven by new research and sustained advocacy. By challenging outdated notions of masculinity, Thai society stands to improve overall well-being and relationships. The shift aligns with local values while addressing the persistent silence surrounding intimate health issues.

Healthy men are not defined by toughness alone. Today, mental, emotional, and physical well-being are recognized as interconnected. Across many countries, men experience shorter life expectancy due to heart disease, diabetes, mental health disorders, and cancer. Reluctance to seek preventive care often stems from stigma, misinformation, and social expectations that equate vulnerability with weakness. Research on this topic emphasizes the need for open dialogue to reduce harm and improve outcomes.

A global conversation is sharpening around parenting styles that are often seen as normal or strict. Psychologists warn that excessive control, harsh discipline, and emotional distance can harm children’s emotional health and long-term development. Research summarized in mainstream sources indicates that authoritarian approaches may undermine resilience, while balanced, warm guidance supports better outcomes for children.

In Thailand, where respect for elders and family hierarchy are deeply rooted, parenting practices are especially scrutinized. Traditional Thai norms have often favored strictness and high expectations. Now experts emphasize that warmth, dialogue, and clear boundaries are essential for healthy child development, aligning with evolving Thai educational and mental health priorities.

A wave of international concern is building as psychologists and child development experts warn that a commonly practiced parenting style, sometimes seen as “normal” or “strict,” can actually have lasting negative effects on children. According to a recent report in the New York Post, this approach—characterized by excessive control, harsh discipline, and a lack of emotional warmth—may undermine children’s emotional health and long-term wellbeing NY Post.

Parenting is a sensitive topic across cultures, especially as the foundations laid in early childhood often shape a person’s capabilities, relationships, and mental resilience. In Thailand, where cultural values around respect for elders and family hierarchy are deeply ingrained, the conversation on parenting practices is especially relevant. Traditional Thai parenting sometimes leans toward strictness and high expectations, echoing aspects of the style that experts are now cautioning against.

A groundbreaking qualitative study has brought new hope and practical strategies for postmenopausal women facing intimacy challenges, showing that with self-awareness, open communication, and support from partners and society, women can rediscover fulfilling relationships well beyond menopause. The findings, published in BMC Public Health and covered by News-Medical, are especially relevant as Thailand’s population rapidly ages and conversations around healthy aging remain prominent in both families and public health policy (News-Medical, Springer).

A new qualitative study offers practical guidance for postmenopausal women facing intimacy challenges, showing that self-awareness, open dialogue with partners, and supportive communities can help women sustain fulfilling relationships beyond menopause. The research, highlighted by reputable health journals, underscores that emotional well-being, relationship dynamics, and cultural context are as important as physical symptoms. In Thailand, where aging demographics are rising and conversations about healthy aging are increasingly on policy agendas, these findings connect to everyday family life and patient care.

A groundbreaking participatory research study in Nepal is reshaping the conversation on adolescent girls’ sexual and reproductive health rights (SRHR), offering valuable lessons for the region—including Thailand—as countries strive to empower young people to make informed choices about their bodies. The study, published by the Brookings Institution, underscores how schools can serve as crucial spaces for strengthening girls’ agency and equipping them with the knowledge and confidence needed to advocate for their SRHR in the face of cultural taboos and misinformation (Brookings, 2025).

A new participatory study from Nepal shows how schools can empower adolescent girls to understand and advocate for sexual and reproductive health rights (SRHR). Published by the Brookings Institution, the research demonstrates that when schools provide accurate information, safe dialogue, and leadership opportunities, girls gain confidence to address SRHR in communities where taboos and misinformation persist.

The Nepal study, conducted June to December 2024 with girls aged 12 to 15 in public schools, highlights persistent risks in low- and middle-income settings. Early marriage, teen pregnancy, and maternal mortality remain concerns in Thailand and beyond, fueled by gaps in reliable information and restricted discussion about puberty, contraception, and sexual rights. Key barriers identified include myths about menstruation and contraception, social stigma, and teaching styles that rely on lectures rather than dialogue and critical thinking.