#CulturalValues

Pope Leo XIV has called on world leaders, tech innovators, and global citizens to ensure the development of artificial intelligence (AI) is guided by ethics, human dignity, and the promotion of peaceful societies. In a message delivered during the AI for Good Summit in Geneva on July 10, 2025, the pontiff urged the international community to establish robust frameworks and regulations that put the “common good” at the center of the AI revolution. As artificial intelligence increasingly shapes key sectors from healthcare and education to governance, the Pope’s intervention underlines mounting concerns about the pace and direction of AI development worldwide.

A recent study from San Francisco State University provides a significant breakthrough for employers and organizations seeking to identify narcissistic tendencies in job candidates. By carefully crafting and analyzing responses to just three targeted interview questions, the researchers found a remarkably efficient method to spot potentially disruptive personalities—offering Thai employers, educators, and even community leaders a practical new tool for building healthier teams and workplaces (Psychology Today).

This research is especially relevant to Thailand, where the concept of “face” and harmonious group interaction play a central role in organizational culture. Narcissistic grandiosity—characterized by a focus on personal gain, dominance in group settings, and a lack of empathy—threatens not only productivity but also the emotional well-being of colleagues. In a country where community, respect, and consensus are highly valued, early identification of such traits can prevent workplace conflict and staff turnover, which are persistent challenges in both Thai corporate and government offices.

A recent study from San Francisco State University offers a practical tool for employers and organizations seeking to identify narcissistic traits in candidates. By analyzing responses to three carefully chosen interview questions, researchers found a notably efficient way to flag potentially disruptive personalities. This approach could help Thai employers, educators, and community leaders build healthier teams and workplaces.

In Thailand, where the concept of face and harmonious group interaction play a central role in organizational culture, narcissistic grandiosity—defined by self-centeredism, dominance, and a lack of empathy—poses risks to both productivity and colleagues’ well-being. Early identification of such traits can help prevent workplace conflict and staff turnover, a persistent challenge in both corporate and government settings in Thailand.

Recent attention has focused on the formative practices instilled in Japanese children, revealing cultural foundations that foster discipline, empathy, and a sense of community. Drawing from a recent article, “10 things Japanese children are taught in childhood” published by the Times of India (source), as well as supporting research and educational policy reviews, this report unpacks these quintessentially Japanese values, examines their impact, and explores lessons for Thai families and educators.

A recent exploration of Japanese childhood practices reveals a set of foundational habits that cultivate discipline, empathy, and community. Drawing on a Times of India feature about what Japanese children are taught, along with supporting research and policy reviews, this piece reframes these lessons for Thai audiences and educators.

Japan is renowned for social order, public respect, and strong educational outcomes. Beyond quiet trains and orderly queues, its core lessons begin in early childhood: emotional self-control, deep respect, patience, teamwork, environmental stewardship, and the ability to find joy in calm celebrations. For Thailand, which is balancing tradition with modernization in education, Japan’s holistic approach offers provocative ideas and practical steps.

A growing wave of research and personal accounts highlights a striking contrast: many European countries embed children and families across daily life, while the United States often treats family needs as secondary. The gap affects childhood development, public health, and social cohesion, beyond mere parental convenience.

This discussion intensified after a viral Salon essay by a Philadelphia mother who traveled through Berlin, London, and Dublin, illustrating how European daily life supports families compared with the U.S. Her reflections align with social science findings and long-standing policy comparisons.

A powerful new wave of research and personal accounts is shining a spotlight on a persistent and striking divide: while European countries embrace children and families in nearly every sphere of life, American society remains hobbled by policies and attitudes that seem, at best, indifferent—and at worst, openly hostile—to children’s needs. The consequences reach far beyond inconvenience for parents, rippling through childhood development, public health, and even social cohesion.

This conversation about child-friendliness erupted once again following a viral first-person essay in Salon by a Philadelphia-based mother who described her travels through Berlin, London, and Dublin, highlighting the profound differences between Europe and the United States in daily life with children. Her observations draw attention to issues confirmed by social science research, expert commentary, and decades of comparative policy analysis.