#Democracy

Silent digital armies now patrol the internet, wielding artificial intelligence weapons that can precisely target individual minds with surgical precision, according to groundbreaking security research from Vanderbilt University. These sophisticated influence operations, spearheaded by Chinese technology firm GoLaxy, represent a quantum leap beyond the crude social media bots that disrupted global elections in previous years. Unlike their primitive predecessors, these AI-powered propaganda systems don’t simply flood platforms with obvious misinformation—they study human psychology, learn cultural nuances, and craft personalized persuasion campaigns that feel authentically local while serving foreign interests.

A new wave of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered propaganda campaigns has arrived, leveraging advanced generative technologies to subtly manipulate public opinion on a massive scale, according to a recent exposé by security researchers at Vanderbilt University The New York Times. Their report highlights operations led by Chinese tech firm GoLaxy, whose AI-driven influence tactics mark a stark escalation from the simplistic, bot-based interference attempts seen during previous American elections.

Unlike the low-quality, mass-messaging bots that sowed discord around the U.S. elections in 2016 and 2020, today’s AI-enabled campaigns are surgically precise, relentless, and nearly undetectable in their ability to shape digital conversations. This newest chapter in “grey-zone” information warfare raises urgent questions for democracies worldwide—including Thailand—about how to protect their public spheres and national debates from invisible manipulation orchestrated from abroad.

Recent research is challenging widespread assumptions about the most talked-about social trends, arguing that many of the narratives gripping public consciousness—such as democracy in crisis, a loneliness epidemic, and declining empathy—don’t actually stand up to rigorous data scrutiny. As Thai society becomes increasingly connected to global debates, understanding the reliability of these trends is crucial, especially as policymakers, educators, and the public draw upon them to shape attitudes and guide responses.

The rapid rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly undermining the foundations of democracy worldwide, according to new research and official warnings. Tools that generate realistic fake images, videos, and audio are being weaponized to deceive voters, influence election outcomes, and foster distrust in democratic processes—often with little oversight or effective countermeasures from authorities or technology firms. This wave of AI-driven disinformation has already played a pivotal role in elections from Europe to Asia, prompting urgent debates on safeguarding electoral integrity and political discourse.

Democracy is often seen as a product of Western political evolution, yet an increasing number of Thai thinkers, monks, and educators highlight that democratic principles—in their essence—can be found within Buddhist teachings and monastic life. Understanding “ประชาธิปไตยในพุทธศาสนา” (democracy in Buddhism) not only bridges religion and governance but also opens the way for Thai society to interpret civic values through familiar spiritual roots.

The interest in democratic aspects of Buddhism is not new to Thai discourse. In the context of ongoing national debates about good governance, civil rights, and social harmony, advocates such as monastic scholars and university educators have long argued that Buddhism has its own model of democracy—one based not on contesting power, but on shared deliberation, ethical consensus, and the dignity of every person. This argument resonates in a society where both Buddhism and democracy are deeply embedded, but whose coexistence is often contested in real-world politics and social structures.

As conversations around political extremism resurge globally, new research and public debates are highlighting the enduring lessons drawn from the history of fascism—reminding both policymakers and the public in Thailand and beyond of the dangers posed by authoritarian and ultranationalist ideologies. Scholars and civic commentators are intensifying calls for Thai society to critically engage with the multifaceted origins, rise, and traumatic impacts of fascist movements in the 20th century, warning that disregarding these histories risks allowing similar patterns to re-emerge in different forms.