#Demographics

A new snapshot of Gen Z family planning finds young adults are delaying parenthood into their late 20s and, worryingly, a significant share are relying on the withdrawal or “pull-out” method as a primary form of birth control. The findings, drawn from a survey by pregnancy test brand First Response and women’s media platform Her Campus and reported by the New York Post, underscore a generational rethinking of when to have children — and a risk calculus around contraception that health experts say could backfire. For Thailand, where the birth rate has plunged to historic lows, the mix of delayed childbearing and inconsistent contraceptive protection holds lessons for sex education, public health, and demographic policy.

Alarming new research reveals that Generation Z adults are increasingly delaying parenthood while simultaneously relying on ineffective contraceptive methods, creating a perfect storm of reproductive health risks that could significantly impact Thailand’s already plummeting birth rates. A comprehensive survey conducted by pregnancy test manufacturer First Response in collaboration with women’s media platform Her Campus discovered that nearly 37% of young adults favor the withdrawal or “pull-out” method as their primary contraceptive approach, despite medical evidence showing this technique fails for approximately one in five couples annually. These findings arrive at a critical moment for Thailand, where birth rates have collapsed to historic lows below population replacement levels, requiring urgent attention to both reproductive health education and family planning support systems.

The growing reluctance among millennials to have more than two children has emerged as a defining demographic trend, with new research highlighting the complex social and economic factors influencing modern family size decisions. This movement, closely linked to rising living costs and shifting values, carries important implications for Thailand as its own birthrate stagnates and younger generations reconsider their priorities.

A recent report by Business Insider details how economic uncertainty—notably high childcare costs, student debt, and the shaky job market—has led many millennials in developed countries to cap their families at two children or forego parenthood entirely. Drawing from interviews with parents and leading sociologists, the article illustrates how families struggle to afford additional children, especially in expensive urban centers. According to a cited Pew Research Center study, millennial women average about 2.02 children, aligning with earlier generations numerically but diverging in terms of economic stability and timing. Experts argue that for many in this cohort, achieving even a two-child household often feels like a luxury rather than a default lifestyle (businessinsider.com).

A new study reported by The Times reveals that parenthood, while generally linked to higher life satisfaction compared to remaining childless, does not guarantee happiness for all—particularly for those who begin parenting at a younger age or have multiple children. This nuanced insight challenges simplistic ideas about family, personal fulfillment, and mental health, raising essential questions for Thai families navigating choices about when, or whether, to start a family.

Across global societies, having children is often seen as a marker of adulthood and personal achievement. In Thailand, traditional values place family at the center of social life, with many expecting individuals to eventually marry and start families. But the latest research underscores that the benefits of parenthood are not the same for everyone, and factors such as the age of first-time parents, number of children, relationship quality, education, and economic security all play a critical role.

Thailand, like many countries across the globe, is entering a demographic era that will reshape its society, economy, and healthcare system: the age of the rapidly aging population. Recent analysis from financial institution Goldman Sachs, as summarized in the article “The Surprising Implications of an Aging Population” (goldmansachs.com), illustrates the far-reaching consequences of this trend—not just for industrialized economies, but also for fast-developing nations like Thailand.

The essence of this news lies in the profound societal changes sparked by longer lifespans and falling birth rates. Demographers and economists warn that, while increasing longevity is a triumph for public health, it introduces new challenges that affect economic growth, labor markets, public finances, and healthcare provision. In Thailand, policymakers, university researchers, and public health officials are already grappling with these questions, seeking strategies to care for a swelling cohort of older adults without stalling the country’s development.

The global decline in birth rates, long framed in terms of morality and cultural anxieties by right-wing commentators, is being recast by recent research as a problem rooted overwhelmingly in financial insecurity and systemic economic barriers. According to a groundbreaking United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) survey, the majority of people worldwide—including Thais—are having fewer children than they desire, primarily because of economic limitations, rather than a loss of interest in family or cultural shifts decried by conservative voices. This pushback comes amid rising alarmism in Western media declaring a “birth-rate crisis” with disastrous economic and social consequences if not urgently addressed.

The global narrative around aging has long been dominated by fears of a looming crisis: a “demographic time bomb” set to overwhelm economies as swelling ranks of elderly dependents outpace shrinking workforces. However, new research from Goldman Sachs challenges this view, suggesting that longer and healthier lifespans may bring more positive outcomes than commonly believed. These insights carry significant implications for Thailand, a nation perched on the threshold of becoming a “super-aged” society within the next decade.

The world’s rapidly declining birth rates have ignited a cultural, political, and economic debate that has reached new prominence in 2025. Concerns surrounding fertility decline, its impacts on social structures, and emerging “pronatalist” movements—those actively promoting higher birth rates—have transitioned from quieter academic discussions to mainstream headlines in Thailand and beyond. The issue isn’t simply statistical: it touches on the future of economies, generational care, cultural norms, and even environmental discussions, prompting stakeholders across the globe to rethink whether “more babies” is the solution to looming demographic challenges.

Bakersfield, a city often noted for its role in California’s agricultural heartland, now holds a curious position in recent demographic analyses: it’s among the U.S. cities with some of the highest reported move-out rates, yet its population continues to expand at a steady pace, local media report (KGET.com). This seemingly contradictory trend hints at the complex dynamics shaping American cities in the wake of pandemic mobility, economic change, and shifts in quality-of-life priorities—a phenomenon with resonances for Thai urban planners closely watching patterns of internal migration and urban growth.

Fears of humanity’s extinction may sound far-fetched, but scientists are warning that global birth rates are falling so fast, some populations could eventually disappear unless women have more children. According to recent research synthesized by experts and highlighted in a much-discussed feature on population trends, the world could see dozens of countries’ populations shrinking by 2100 due to persistently low fertility rates—a phenomenon with profound implications for economies, societies, and the future of human civilization itself (Daily Mail).

A groundbreaking new study has found that adults who report avoidant attachment to their parents are significantly more likely to choose a childfree lifestyle, a trend that is increasingly visible in both Western societies and emerging in Thai urban areas. The research, which analyzes psychological factors influencing reproductive decisions, adds valuable context to ongoing discussions about declining birth rates and shifting family expectations worldwide.

As Thailand faces an alarming drop in national birth rates — the lowest in decades according to the National Economic and Social Development Council (Bangkok Post) — the findings are particularly relevant. While economic uncertainties and shifting societal roles have been widely acknowledged as drivers, the new study highlights the impact of family attachments and early-life emotional bonds on adult choices to remain childfree.

A groundbreaking new study is challenging longstanding demographic wisdom by asserting that humanity’s current fertility rate is now too low to guarantee survival—even if average births per woman meet the historical “replacement” level. The research, led by a Japanese scientist and published in the journal PLOS One, argues that the global average of 2.1 children per woman simply isn’t enough. Instead, it suggests that a fertility rate of 2.7 is the true mark required to ensure humanity’s long-term prospects, a conclusion that carries serious implications for countries like Thailand, where the fertility rate is well below these thresholds.

A recent viral video has reignited a global discussion about the generational double standards around family-building, as one woman called out baby boomer parents for pressuring their children to have kids—only to withhold meaningful support once the grandchildren arrived. The conversation, which originated from a candid social media confession, has led to broader debate in Thailand, where societal expectations around marriage, parenthood, and intergenerational care remain deeply rooted.

The woman’s video, reported by Upworthy, struck a chord with viewers by highlighting the gap between the persistent urging of older parents for their children to “settle down and have a family,” and the reality that, once grandchildren arrive, practical help—from babysitting to emotional support—can be limited or conditional. The case mirrors experiences shared by many Millennial and Gen Z adults globally, including those in Thai society, who feel squeezed by traditional expectations without adequate communal or familial backing (Upworthy).

A growing body of research is challenging the conventional wisdom that couples should wait until their careers and finances are fully secure before starting a family. According to a recent perspective published by Deseret News, parents who have children in their twenties can enjoy strong professional success, improved well-being, and meaningful family connections—with early parenthood offering a range of surprising advantages. The article, backed by studies and expert opinions, urges Thai families and policymakers to revisit their assumptions about the “right” time to start a family and consider the mounting evidence in favor of earlier parenthood.