#Digitalculture

Groundbreaking Spanish research reveals that children as young as twelve possess sophisticated understanding of adult content platforms like OnlyFans, viewing these digital marketplaces as viable alternatives to traditional employment while demonstrating alarming normalization of sexualized content consumption and creation. The comprehensive study involving 164 high school students aged twelve to sixteen exposes how hypersexualized digital culture fundamentally alters adolescent perceptions of economic opportunity, self-worth, and sexuality in ways that demand urgent attention from Thai parents, educators, and policymakers. These findings carry profound implications for Thailand, where social media adoption reaches extraordinary levels while conversations about online safety and youth mental health gain unprecedented urgency throughout communities nationwide.

A new study has raised alarms among parents, educators, and policy-makers after revealing that adolescents as young as 12 not only know about OnlyFans but view it as a potentially appealing and empowering way to earn money, setting it alongside or even above traditional work or educational pathways. The research, conducted in Spain and published in Sexuality & Culture, uncovers how the normalization of erotic content platforms is influencing how young people, especially girls, perceive economic opportunity, self-worth, and sexuality (PsyPost).

A new study signals a urgent need for Thai parents and educators as teens in Thailand increasingly encounter advanced concepts about adult content platforms and monetization online. Focus groups with students ages 12 to 16 reveal that digital culture is reshaping how young people view work, self-worth, and sexuality, with social media usage already running high across urban and rural communities. The findings underscore the momentum of online ecosystems and their implications for youth wellbeing in Thai society.

Online dating has reshaped how people meet, but recent research shows its emotional footprint runs deeper than expected. Professionals describe practices like ghosting, breadcrumbing, and even fabricating details as increasingly common, contributing to fatigue for those seeking genuine connections. For Thai audiences, the takeaway is clear: digital courtship affects well-being as much as relationships themselves.

In Bangkok and Thailand’s urban centers, dating apps touch more than romance. They remove traditional social barriers while presenting fast-paced exchanges and selective messaging. In Thai online communities, terms such as ghosting (suddenly ending contact), breadcrumbing (sporadic attention to keep someone interested), and zombieing (reappearing after disappearance) have entered everyday conversations, signaling how love is discussed in the digital era.

Mobile dating apps such as Tinder, Bumble, Hinge, and others have revolutionized how people initiate romantic or sexual connections, but experts now warn that these platforms are leaving a deeper emotional mark than many realize. According to the latest research and reporting, emotionally damaging behaviors like ghosting, breadcrumbing, and even the fabrication of personal information are increasingly prevalent online, causing growing psychological fatigue among users who seek genuine connections but find themselves navigating a minefield of manipulation and disappointment (El País).

In a striking reversal of expectations shaped by decades of sexual liberation, new research reveals that Generation Z is experiencing what experts call a “sex recession” — with fewer young people engaging in intercourse than ever before. Recent findings shed light on the underlying causes and cultural anxieties fueling this unexpected trend, raising questions about the future of relationships, intimacy, and sexual well-being among Thailand’s youth and their global peers.

A quiet shift is unfolding among Thai youths and around the world: Generation Z appears to be having fewer sexual experiences by the same life stage as previous generations. For Thai readers, the trend intersects with local concerns about relationships, online culture, and overall well-being. Researchers describe a complex mix of social, psychological, and technological factors shaping intimate life in the digital age.

Across markets, data suggest Gen Z is engaging less in sexual activity at comparable ages. A synthesis by a leading health journalist draws on conversations with more than 100 people under 30, showing that it is not a lack of desire but a network of pressures shaping behavior. Many young people feel overwhelmed by online media and social expectations, leaving them uncertain about real-life intimacy.

A recent analysis has shed new light on the profound psychological impact of viral shame and online outrage, revealing that the aftermath of public scandal can inflict deeper, more lasting trauma than the scandalous event itself. As digital outrage continues to shape public discourse worldwide, Thai society is increasingly wrestling with the health and social ramifications of cyber-shaming and its devastating consequences for individuals and families.

The report, highlighted in Psychology Today under the title “The Real Scandal Isn’t the Affair—It’s Our Reaction”, argues that the real damage often emerges not from an initial act—such as an affair—but from the crushing wave of public condemnation that follows when personal failings go viral. The authors point to a growing body of psychological research showing that the experience of internet-driven shaming can be deeply traumatic, leaving victims more vulnerable to anxiety, depression, PTSD symptoms, and social withdrawal than the transgression itself.

A fresh analysis shows that viral shame can inflict more enduring trauma than the transgression itself. As digital anger shapes public discourse, Thai communities are increasingly confronting the health and social consequences of cyber-shaming for individuals and families.

The study, highlighted in a prominent psychology feature, argues that damage often comes not from the act but from the wave of public condemnation that follows when personal failures go viral. Research cited in the piece indicates internet-driven shaming can trigger anxiety, depression, PTSD-like symptoms, and social withdrawal that surpass the impact of the original behavior.

A new trend is sweeping across South Korea’s youth: personality tests based on the concepts of testosterone and estrogen, labelled as ‘teto’ and ‘egen’, are becoming the latest markers of identity and compatibility, especially among young singles. This hormone-inspired typology is rapidly nudging aside the long-dominant MBTI as the go-to tool for self-understanding, social interaction, and even dating decisions—a phenomenon already echoed by pop culture and social media, and increasingly stirring discussion among experts.

A rapid trend from Korea is reshaping how young people think about identity and compatibility. A 28-question test based on hormonal cues, known as the teto-egen typology, has become a popular shorthand in conversations, dating, and online communities—outpacing MBTI in everyday discussions. The wave has extended into pop culture, fueling debates among educators and researchers alike.

In teto-egen, people are categorized by energy type and interpersonal style. The system identifies four archetypes: teto men who are athletic and bold; egen men who are gentle and appearance-conscious; teto women who are expressive and outgoing; and egen women who are reserved and traditionally feminine. Many youths use these labels to gauge potential romantic compatibility from blind dates to discussions about celebrities. A major Southeast Asian study notes that millions have engaged with these archetypes on Korean personality platforms.

A new wave of artificial intelligence (AI) companions is promising seamless emotional support and simulated relationships, but recent research warns that our growing reliance on “synthetic intimacy” comes with profound psychological costs. As Thai society rapidly adopts virtual assistants, chatbots, and AI-driven relationship apps, researchers caution that confusing machine simulation for genuine human connection could reshape our emotional well-being and disrupt core aspects of Thai social life.

The popularity of AI chatbots designed to act as romantic partners, friends, or even therapists has exploded globally. A striking example comes from a recent experiment by a prominent technology futurist who dated four different AI “boyfriends,” each powered by a major large language model such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and MetaAI. She described her experiences as “sweet and steamy,” but also admitted they revealed new, unsettling emotional possibilities. This trend, echoed throughout the international tech world, is now making inroads across Southeast Asia, including in Thailand, where the tech sector and the digitally native generation are increasingly turning to virtual relationships out of curiosity, loneliness, or a desire for frictionless companionship (Psychology Today).

A new wave of AI companions offers seamless emotional support and simulated relationships, but researchers warn that relying on “synthetic intimacy” carries significant psychological costs. As Thai society rapidly adopts virtual assistants, chatbots, and AI-driven relationship apps, experts caution that mistaking machine simulation for real human connection could reshape emotional health and everyday social life in Thailand.

Global interest in AI partners has surged. In a high-profile personal experiment, a tech thinker dated several AI “boyfriends” built on major language models. She described the experience as both charming and unsettling, highlighting new emotional possibilities. This trend is echoing across Southeast Asia, including Thailand, where a youthful, digitally native generation is exploring virtual relationships out of curiosity, loneliness, or a desire for frictionless companionship. Research from credible outlets notes the growing footprint of synthetic intimacy in daily life.

As artificial intelligence rapidly becomes entwined with daily life, a new wave of research is sounding the alarm about the psychological risks of relying on AI for companionship and emotional support. A recent article by a cognitive psychologist and former tech industry leader highlights the rise of what experts are calling “synthetic intimacy”—a phenomenon unfolding as people increasingly turn to AI chatbots for personal connection, therapy, and even romance. With growing numbers across the globe, including in Thailand, engaging with AI companions, experts stress the urgent need to better understand the consequences for mental health, personal growth, and social cohesion. [psychologytoday.com]

As AI becomes more embedded in daily life, new research warns about the psychological costs of turning to machines for companionship, therapy, and romance. A recent piece from a cognitive psychologist and former tech leader describes “synthetic intimacy”—people forming emotional bonds with AI chatbots. With growing adoption across the globe, including in Thailand, experts urge careful examination of impacts on mental health, personal growth, and social cohesion.

In a world selling frictionless solutions, generative AI is marketed not only as a productivity tool but also as a companion. The article recounts a tech futurist’s experience dating four AI chatbots from major platforms. The reflections reveal moments of sweetness and emotional engagement. The takeaway is clear: many users feel seen by AI and share intimate thoughts with systems that never judge.

A new international study from the University of Brighton and the University of Coimbra shows that ghosting and gaslighting—common online relationship behaviours—can fuel depression and paranoia, especially among young adults. The findings underscore the mental health risks tied to modern dating cultures and the broader impact of online dating on wellbeing. Research by reputable institutions highlights how anonymity and ease of cutting contact online exacerbate emotional harm.

In Thailand, social media and dating apps are increasingly shaping romance, mirroring global trends. Experts say online disappearance (ghosting) and manipulating someone’s perception (gaslighting) are not only painful but damaging to mental health. With dating app use rising locally and mental health apps gaining traction among Thais, it’s timely to understand these dynamics. Data from Thailand’s tech and health sectors shows high engagement with wellness platforms, reflecting a growing public interest in mental health support.

A groundbreaking study released by researchers at the University of Brighton and the University of Coimbra reveals that ghosting and gaslighting—two behaviours increasingly prevalent in the digital age—can trigger depression and paranoia, particularly among young adults. The findings highlight not only the mental health risks associated with these relationship practices but also the broader impact of online dating culture on psychological wellbeing (The Independent).

Modern romance in Thailand, as in much of the world, is increasingly mediated by social media and dating applications. The latest research confirms suspicions long held by mental health professionals: the anonymity and ease of cutting contact online (known as ghosting) and manipulating a partner’s reality (gaslighting) are not just emotionally painful but measurably damaging to mental health. The study’s results are particularly relevant as usage of dating apps continues to surge locally, and mental health apps themselves find a growing market among Thais—82% of those surveyed by Rakuten Insight reported continued use of mental wellness apps in 2022 (Statista).

A new study highlights ghosting and gaslighting in online dating as risk factors for mental health issues among young adults. Researchers from the University of Brighton and the University of Coimbra found links between these behaviors and symptoms of depression and paranoia, underscoring emotional risks in modern dating culture.

For Thai readers, the findings feel highly relevant in a social media-driven era where dating apps are popular among Gen Z and millennials. As relationship norms evolve, digital rejection and manipulation can spread with a single tap. Ghosting—being suddenly ignored—and gaslighting—emphasizing doubt about one’s memory or perceptions—can leave lasting emotional effects.

As artificial intelligence floods our daily lives with rapid answers at the tap of a screen, a new wave of research is raising urgent questions: Is our dependence on instant knowledge in fact undermining the very wisdom that makes us human? A recent analysis published in Psychology Today offers a sobering examination of what we lose when we trade reflection for immediacy—and what Thai society must do to reclaim the deep thinking that underpins both personal and collective growth (Psychology Today).

The rise of ghosting and gaslighting in digital-age relationships is causing significant psychological harm, especially among young adults, a new study reveals. Researchers from the University of Brighton and the University of Coimbra have found strong links between these increasingly common relationship behaviors and symptoms of depression and paranoia, raising fresh concerns about the dangers lurking within online dating culture (The Independent).

For Thai readers living in an era dominated by social media and dating apps, these findings underscore a growing mental health risk that may hit close to home. As relationship customs shift, digital rejection and manipulation techniques—once limited by physical proximity—now cross geographical borders with the tap of a screen. Whether someone has been abruptly ignored by a romantic prospect (ghosting) or repeatedly manipulated to question their own memory and reality (gaslighting), the psychological damage can be profound.

A new wave of research questions whether faster answers truly sharpen thinking. An analysis in Psychology Today argues that immediacy may erode deliberate reflection and suggests ways Thai society can reclaim thoughtful, growth-oriented thinking for individuals and communities.

Generative AI now delivers detailed responses on nearly every topic, transforming not just how we access information but how we feel, relate, and reason. Patience, vulnerability, and the slow maturation of ideas—once central to wisdom—face disruption as AI favors quick fixes and a sense of control that may mask shallow insight. Experts warn that time spent with uncertainty is being traded for instant gratification, altering a core aspect of the human experience.

New meta-analyses suggest social conformity has remained steady for nearly two decades, even as digital networks explode. Combined with modern brain-imaging studies, these findings deepen our understanding of why people align with or resist their peers. The implications are meaningful for Thai society as it navigates rapid social and technological changes.

Social conformity is our tendency to adjust attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors to fit a group. In Thailand, where collectivism and hierarchical respect influence education, workplaces, and family life, understanding conformity helps shape health campaigns, classroom practices, and civic participation. The latest meta-analysis, which covers studies from 2004 to 2022, shows that social influence exists but has not grown dramatically due to the internet era. Researchers note the need for more work to identify factors such as culture, media, and peer pressure that shape conformity in different settings.

In the digital age, where social media’s influence is ever-expanding, many assume that people have become more susceptible to groupthink. However, a recent meta-analysis suggests otherwise, finding that social conformity has remained surprisingly consistent over nearly two decades, despite the explosion of digital networking. These findings, alongside cutting-edge brain imaging studies, are helping scientists unravel how and why individuals choose to align with—or deviate from—their peers, with major implications for Thai society navigating rapid social and technological change (Counterpunch, 2025).

Meta has turned private AI prompts into a public, social experience. Its new AI site lets users share prompts and generated content in a feed similar to social posts. This marks a shift from the private use of generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Google Gemini, or Claude, where prompts stay with the user unless shared intentionally.

This development reframes human-AI interaction for a broad audience. In Thailand and across Asia, social features on AI platforms could influence how people learn, create, and communicate online. As Thai schools and workplaces increasingly adopt AI for education, health, and creative tasks, understanding public prompting becomes more relevant. Meta’s social feed aims to lower barriers for “AI newbies” by making the process visible and encouraging experimentation. Yet it also raises questions about privacy, content quality, and digital culture.