#DigitalLearning

A recent review of North Carolina school districts found that a substantial number lack written policies on classroom use of artificial intelligence, raising fresh questions about preparedness, equity and academic integrity that resonate far beyond the United States. The review examined 26 districts and found 17 had formal policies guiding AI use in classrooms while eight districts reported no policy and one district did not respond, highlighting inconsistent district-level responses to a technology which educators say is already reshaping teaching and learning. At the same time, controlled trials from U.S. universities show measurable academic benefits when chatbots and AI tools are integrated thoughtfully, suggesting that absence of policy does not mean absence of potential. For Thai educators, policymakers and parents, the North Carolina snapshot offers a cautionary example: without coordinated guidance and teacher training, schools risk both missed opportunities and harms related to cheating, bias, and widened digital divides.

A groundbreaking review in neuroscience is challenging commonly held beliefs about how reading and listening shape what we learn, revealing that each medium activates the brain in unique ways and is not simply interchangeable. While today’s digital landscape overflows with audiobooks, podcasts, and voice-driven AI, new research highlights that reading in print or on screens still plays an irreplaceable role in effective learning—especially when grappling with complex material (The Conversation, 2025).

A recent incident at a prominent American university has reignited global debate over the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in education. On March 25, students enrolled in an undergraduate computer science course were informed that “clear evidence of AI usage” had been detected in one-third of submissions for a major problem set. The announcement, made via the course’s online platform, presented students with a stark ultimatum: admit to using AI within 10 days and accept a significant grade penalty, or risk more severe disciplinary measures, including referral to the university’s Executive Committee (ExComm) for academic misconduct (Yale Daily News).

A recent MIT-led study has ignited a global conversation about the cognitive impact of artificial intelligence (AI) use in education, warning that reliance on tools like ChatGPT could erode students’ ability to engage in deep, critical thinking and retain ownership of their ideas. The research, which has gained notable attention in international and Thai education circles, strikes at the heart of a rapidly growing dilemma—as AI-generated writing becomes easier and more prevalent, could it make us, in effect, intellectually lazier and less capable over time? (NYT)

A wave of advocacy is sweeping across the education landscape as more than 250 top corporate leaders, together with Code.org—one of the world’s most influential computer science non-profits—have urged policymakers to make artificial intelligence (AI) and computer science classes a standard requirement in high schools. Their call, encapsulated in an open letter published earlier this month, highlights mounting pressure on the US and global education systems to ensure that today’s students are equipped for an era dominated by AI-powered technologies. This ambitious push, already supported by research and global industry trends, holds important lessons and opportunities for Thailand as it grapples with its own transformation in education and workforce preparation.