#Digitalwellbeing

A new wave of research shows Thailand’s Gen Z spends long hours online, and heavy screen time is linked to anxiety, depression, eating disorders, and even suicidality. Thai researchers and national statistics converge on a critical question: how can communities shield the next generation from a digital health emergency?

An influential editorial, Saving Our Kids from Scrolling to Death, highlights how smartphones and online platforms shape today’s youth. This view aligns with international findings and Thailand’s own data, underscoring a global shift with local consequences.

A wave of online reconnections is reshaping Thai social life. A recent feature highlights practical questions and growing evidence about the benefits and risks of reconnecting with long-lost friends, urging readers to examine motives before sending that message.

Thai culture prizes social harmony and enduring relationships. Yet rapid digital change has broadened networks beyond traditional boundaries. Whether sparked by nostalgia, curiosity, or a desire to heal, reconnecting can renew bonds—alongside challenges that deserve careful consideration.

As social media makes it ever easier to bridge years of separation with a single click, more Thais find themselves weighing whether to reconnect with old friends online. A recent report in The Washington Post spotlights emerging scientific evidence and expert advice on this modern dilemma, urging readers to reflect on their motivations and the risks before reaching out to long-lost acquaintances (Washington Post).

The significance of these findings is particularly salient in Thailand, where social harmony and close-knit communities are deeply embedded in culture, yet where digital transformation has expanded networks beyond traditional boundaries. Whether prompted by curiosity, nostalgia, or a desire to heal old wounds, rekindling a friendship from the past raises not only possibilities for renewal but also challenges that may go unconsidered.

A new study highlights a connection between intense romantic obsession, heavy social media use, and everyday cognitive challenges such as memory lapses and reduced attention. Involving 600 adults, the research explores how emotional dependence in relationships interacts with online behaviors, offering insights relevant to Thailand as dating norms and digital life continue to evolve.

Romantic obsession refers to a compulsive pattern of thoughts and behaviors focused on a partner. It can include urges to preserve the relationship, mood swings, distress when apart, and persistent rumination. The study deepens this understanding by examining how such attachment influences cognitive functioning in daily life. In Thailand, where relationship expectations and online presence are deeply woven into social norms, these findings resonate with local experiences of digital dating and boundary testing in public spaces.

A recent study published in Behavioural Brain Research has revealed a significant connection between symptoms of love addiction and persistent problems with memory, attention, and cognitive performance in everyday life. The research, conducted with 600 adult participants, paints a complex picture of how intense emotional dependence in romantic relationships—along with heavy social media use—may harm mental clarity and well-being, with important implications for Thai readers as digital habits and relationship expectations evolve (PsyPost).

AI chatbots offer convenience and quick answers, but Thai mental health professionals warn they can unintentionally trigger compulsive patterns in people with obsessive-compulsive disorder. While these tools support learning and daily tasks, they may encourage endless questioning and reinforce unhealthy habits for vulnerable users.

OCD affects about 1-2% of people, characterized by intrusive thoughts and repetitive behaviors or mental acts aimed at reducing distress. In the past, reassurance came from friends, family, or online searches. Today, persistent chatbots provide a tireless source of information that never sleeps.

Millions globally have embraced ChatGPT and similar AI chatbots for everything from homework help to late-night life advice. But a growing body of evidence suggests that, for some people living with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), these digital companions can become problematic—fueling a cycle of compulsive questioning and reinforcing unhealthy patterns that may worsen their symptoms. Recent reporting by Vox has ignited international discussion about this emerging challenge, prompting Thai mental health professionals and digital wellbeing advocates to examine the Thai context and consider what safeguards might help local users maintain balance in an increasingly AI-driven world (Vox).

A growing number of real-world psychiatric crises are being linked to long, emotionally intense conversations with generative AI chatbots, notably ChatGPT. This trend is sparking international concern and urgent debates about the mental health risks of unregulated artificial intelligence. In Europe and the United States, reports describe users developing paranoid beliefs, grandiose thinking, or detachment from reality after sustained engagement with AI. These cases are increasingly referred to as “ChatGPT psychosis,” highlighting a potential harm for vulnerable individuals.

A surge in real-world psychiatric crises has been linked to deep and obsessive engagement with generative AI chatbots, most notably ChatGPT, sparking international concern and urgent debates about the mental health dangers of unregulated artificial intelligence. Recent reports from the US and Europe expose a distressing trend: some users, after extended and emotionally intense interactions with AI, descend into paranoid delusions, grandiose thinking, and catastrophic breaks from reality—phenomena increasingly referred to as “ChatGPT psychosis” [Futurism; TheBrink.me; Psychology Today].

A new study highlighted in international media suggests that playing video games, including those featuring violent content, may help in reducing stress—a finding of significance amid growing concerns about digital wellness among Thais. According to a report on TechSpot, the research challenges conventional wisdom that associates violent video games solely with negative psychological effects, instead pointing to their potential role in coping with daily stress.

For years, video gaming—especially games involving graphic violence—has been viewed warily by parents, educators, and policymakers in Thailand, who often cite concerns about aggressive behavior, addiction, and distracted learning. In its latest findings, however, researchers conducted controlled experiments measuring stress levels before and after participants played a range of games, from peaceful puzzles to fast-paced action shooters. The surprising result: players of violent games often experienced stress relief on par with—if not greater than—that seen with non-violent genres.

A recent international study suggests that playing video games, even violent ones, may help reduce stress. For Thai audiences navigating digital wellness and busy daily life, the finding offers a new lens on gaming as a potential coping tool when used wisely.

Research involved controlled experiments that measured stress levels before and after participants played a range of games, from peaceful puzzles to fast-paced action titles. The results showed that violent games can provide stress relief comparable to, or greater than, non-violent games when played with intention and balance.

It happens to everyone: after a long day filled with noise, digital pings, and never-ending demands, you snap at a loved one or lose patience in a seemingly trivial moment. According to new insight featured in HuffPost’s recent article, “So THAT’S Why You Get Mad When You’re Overstimulated”, this isn’t just a personal flaw—it’s a biological response experienced by countless people worldwide, including many Thais adapting to the nonstop rhythm of modern life (HuffPost).

After a long day filled with noise, pings, and never-ending demands, many people snap at loved ones or lose patience over small annoyances. New insights highlighted in a recent HuffPost piece explain that this isn’t a personal flaw—it’s a biological response shared by many worldwide, including many Thais adapting to the nonstop pace of modern life.

The trend of feeling irritable when overstimulated is gaining attention as digital life intensifies sensory input. A viral tweet sparked the HuffPost discussion, with thousands admitting, “I can be really mean when I’m overstimulated.” The pattern is familiar: a rough morning or a flood of notifications makes minor issues seem disproportionately upsetting. But what causes this, and what can people in busy cities like Bangkok do about it?

New psychological research explains why we can become irritable or mean when we are overstimulated. The findings are especially relevant in fast-paced Thai cities where life is increasingly digital, loud, and crowded. A recent HuffPost piece highlighted how people often feel snappy when information, chaos, or noise bombard the senses.

In Thailand’s urban centers, such as Bangkok, sensory input is relentless: horns, crowded trains, and constant smartphone notifications. Experts say feeling “mean” under overload is a physiological response, not a character flaw. When senses are continually triggered, the brain’s prefrontal cortex—the area that guides rational thinking—can temporarily downshift. That leaves people more prone to reactive, impulsive behavior.

A new wave of psychological research is shedding light on why we often become irritable or even mean when we’re overstimulated—a problem that resonates with thousands across the globe and is highly relevant as life in Thailand grows more fast-paced, urban, and digitally driven. According to a viral phenomenon discussed in a recent HuffPost report, people overwhelmingly share the experience of getting snappy or short-tempered when their senses and minds are bombarded with too much information, chaos, or noise (HuffPost).

A common frustration for busy professionals: rereading an email before sending it, sometimes multiple times. A June 2025 analysis highlighted by VegOut Magazine reveals eight personality traits that influence this habit. For Thai workers in service, finance, education, and public communication, understanding these traits can boost productivity, workplace harmony, and well-being.

Rereading emails is often pegged as perfectionism, but psychology suggests a richer picture. Interviews with communication experts and researchers point to a blend of traits shaping this behavior. The eight traits are high personal standards, conscientiousness, empathy, social anxiety, respect for others’ time, a sense of professionalism, risk aversion, and deliberate self-reflection. When managed well, these tendencies can become valuable strengths rather than hindrances.

Anyone who has hesitated over the “Send” button and found themselves rereading an email for the fourth, or even the fourteenth time, is far from alone. Recent psychological analysis, as reported in a June 2025 article by VegOut Magazine, shines a revealing light on this common digital-age phenomenon. For Thai professionals in burgeoning service and communication-driven sectors, understanding the deeper personality traits behind this habit holds special relevance for personal productivity, workplace harmony, and well-being.

Many Thais worry about spending too much time glued to their smartphones, but a new perspective is gaining ground: perhaps constant phone use isn’t really about addiction, but a signal of deeper unmet emotional needs. Recent analysis and expert commentary, featured in VegOut Magazine on June 20, 2025, argue that it’s time to reframe our view of digital compulsion—not as a moral failing or clinical addiction, but as a reflection of seven core human needs going unfulfilled in daily life (VegOutMag.com).

A new perspective on phone use suggests it may reflect unmet emotional needs rather than simple addiction. Recent analysis highlighted by VegOut Magazine on June 20, 2025 argues that heavy screen time can be a signal of seven core needs going unfulfilled in daily life, reframed as an opportunity for healthier living rather than a moral failing.

In Thailand’s rapidly digitizing society, the topic resonates deeply. Data from the National Statistical Office in 2024 shows that over 90% of adults aged 18–35 consider their mobile phone essential, yet more than half wish they could spend significantly less time staring at screens. This paradox fuels concerns among parents, teachers, and health professionals about technology’s role in daily life and education.

A growing body of research challenges the instinct to flee boredom. Constantly reaching for smartphones may undermine mental health and hinder self-discovery. In discussing the topic for Thai audiences, recent coverage navigates how boredom functions in our digital era and how Thai society might approach this often neglected emotion.

Thais, like people worldwide, live in a culture saturated with digital distractions. Whether waiting in line at a food stall, riding the BTS Skytrain, or enduring a classroom lull, many reach for their devices. Experts now suggest boredom, though uncomfortable, serves a purpose—somewhat like hunger or loneliness—pushing us toward more meaningful activities.

A growing body of research is challenging our instinctive avoidance of boredom, suggesting that our constant efforts to escape it—especially through smartphones—may be undermining both our mental health and the potential for meaningful self-discovery. Recent findings discussed in The Guardian highlight the complexity of boredom’s role in the digital age and spark fresh debate on how Thai society should approach this underestimated emotion.

Thais, like people everywhere, live in an era saturated with digital distractions. Whether waiting in line at a food stall, riding the BTS Skytrain, or enduring a lull during classroom lectures, the reflex for many is to reach for a smartphone. The implications run deeper than wasted time: a new consensus among psychologists is that boredom, although often uncomfortable, serves an important function similar to hunger or loneliness by prompting us toward more engaging or meaningful pursuits.

A new international study finds that problematic pornography use tends to stay stable over time and is strongly connected to mental distress. For health experts and policymakers, the findings emphasize that support should target those already struggling rather than expecting a rapid surge in cases. The research also highlights the mental health implications of online adult content in an era of widespread internet access, which is highly relevant to Thailand’s increasingly digital society.

A new study has revealed that problematic pornography use tends to remain stable over time and is strongly associated with mental distress, reshaping the way health experts and policymakers perceive the issue and its impact, including in Thailand’s increasingly digital society. The findings bring attention to the ongoing debate about the effects of online pornography, especially its potentially serious implications on mental health, societal well-being, and youth development.

The report, as summarised in PsyPost, highlights that while rates of problematic pornography use do not appear to be rapidly increasing in the population, individuals who already struggle with compulsive pornography consumption tend to maintain these patterns. Crucially, the research draws a clear link between problematic use and higher rates of mental distress, such as symptoms of depression, anxiety, and emotional instability.

Attention is tightening its grip on daily life. In Thailand—and across Southeast Asia—digital use is surging, yet many people report they can’t sustain focus for more than a minute or two. New research suggests the decline is real but multifaceted, shaped by work habits as much as by smartphones. The story is evolving from a crisis narrative to practical strategies that fit Thai workplaces and communities.

Across decades, focus time on screens has shortened. Early research showed adults could maintain steady attention for roughly two and a half minutes; by 2012 that dropped to about 75 seconds. Modern assessments place the average around 47 seconds. These findings come from respected scholars at institutions like the University of California, Irvine, who have explored how digital ecosystems fragment our concentration. In Thailand, the picture mirrors these trends as offices stay perpetually “on” and notifications flood workers, a pattern intensified by the pandemic and the country’s rapid digital adoption.