#Education

A widely discussed New York Times opinion piece by a Harvard computer science professor has reignited debate about the role of personal ideology in university education, arguing that increased polarization on campus is eroding public trust in academia and undermining the primary mission of teaching and research (NYTimes).

The article, published on May 2, 2025, arrives at a moment when global conflicts and identity-based movements have sharpened divisions within higher education, including Thailand’s own top-tier universities. The professor, who describes involvement in Jewish and Israeli student support, anti-antisemitism initiatives, and other activism outside the classroom, explains a steadfast commitment to keeping his own teaching space focused solely on the subject of computer science—even amid requests from students engaged in campus protests for special academic consideration.

The ongoing debate about the nutritional value and social implications of baby food pouches has taken on renewed urgency following recent research by the University of Leeds, which revealed that 41% of main meals marketed for children contain excessive sugar, while 21% of ready-to-eat products are deemed too watery to provide adequate nutrition (The Guardian). While some public health advocates warn about rising childhood obesity and tooth decay linked to ultra-processed foods (UPFs), others argue that the conversation is often weaponised to intensify “maternal guilt” rather than meaningfully address broader issues affecting parents’ lives.

Recent research from an Arizona State University computer science expert has sparked new discussion over the hidden costs of interacting politely with artificial intelligence platforms like ChatGPT—raising questions that resonate beyond the United States, especially as Thailand increasingly embraces AI technologies in education, customer service, and public administration. According to an associate professor at the School of Computing and Augmented Intelligence at Arizona State University, every seemingly simple interaction with a chatbot—whether it involves typing “please,” “thank you,” or engaging in more elaborate exchanges—triggers complex computations within vast neural networks, consuming significant resources and energy (KTAR News).

Confirmation bias, a deeply rooted psychological phenomenon, explains why we tend to focus on information that agrees with our pre-existing beliefs and ignore or discredit evidence that challenges them. In everyday life, this invisible force shapes not only our individual decisions but also the way Thai society interprets news, politics, and even the stories we tell ourselves about our health and well-being. The significance of understanding confirmation bias is becoming increasingly clear in an era where information is abundant but polarization is rising, both globally and in Thailand.

A growing body of research and expert opinion is challenging the long-held belief that parents must strive for perfection, arguing instead that embracing imperfection can actually benefit both parents and their children. This shift in mindset, supported by psychologists and child development experts, reflects a move away from the pressures of flawless parenting and highlights the value of being a “good enough” parent—a perspective increasingly relevant for Thai families navigating modern challenges.

The Dunning-Kruger Effect is a psychological phenomenon where people with limited knowledge or skill in a particular area often overestimate their own abilities, while those who are more competent may actually underestimate themselves. This effect, first identified by researchers at Cornell University in 1999, has become a widely discussed topic in psychology, workplace training, and even daily Thai culture, as it sheds light on why some individuals appear inexplicably confident about topics they barely understand, while experts may downplay their own expertise [thestandard.co], [themomentum.co], [thaipublica.org].

Every day, people in Thailand—like in many countries—make decisions, big and small, often based on the information that comes most readily to mind. Whether it’s choosing a school, selecting healthcare options, or even deciding which road to take during rainy season, human judgment is rarely as objective as we might assume. One powerful but often unnoticed force at play is “availability bias,” a psychological phenomenon that shapes thinking and behavior based on the information most easily recalled, rather than all relevant facts [Simply Psychology], [Encyclopedia Britannica].

A growing body of research highlights how growing up with persistently negative parents can have significant and lasting effects on children, even shaping behaviors and well-being well into adulthood. According to insights from psychologists featured in Parade’s recent article, individuals raised in such environments often manifest distinct emotional and behavioral patterns, prompting renewed calls in Thailand and globally to address the intergenerational impacts of parental negativity on mental health Parade.

The relevance of this issue resonates strongly in Thai society, where family ties and respect for elders are central cultural values. However, new research demonstrates that a family environment dominated by criticism, pessimism, or negativity can inadvertently sow long-term challenges for children. These challenges can manifest as self-doubt, chronic anxiety, difficulties in forming relationships, or a tendency to expect the worst, potentially hindering personal growth and success.

Imagine entering a Thai street market and seeing a beautifully woven silk scarf with a price tag of 2,000 baht. Even if you believe the actual value is lower, that first price sets a reference point. When the vendor offers you a “special price” of 1,200 baht, it feels like a bargain—regardless of the true worth of the scarf. This common negotiation scenario is a classic example of the “anchoring effect,” a psychological phenomenon that subtly but powerfully sways our decisions, often without us noticing.

Across the globe and increasingly in Thailand, a rising number of individuals—especially women—are choosing to become single parents by choice, signaling a paradigm shift in both family structures and societal attitudes. While single parenthood once commonly stemmed from unplanned circumstances, new research shows that a growing share of single parents are consciously opting for this path, empowered by advancing reproductive technologies and changing social norms. As Thai society experiences its own demographic and cultural transitions, understanding this phenomenon is crucial for policymakers, educators, and families.

A new meta-analysis by the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences offers the most detailed understanding to date of how our brains process written language—a development with profound implications for education, mental health, and addressing literacy challenges in Thailand and worldwide. Published in the journal Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, the study summarizes decades of neuroscience research, analyzing data from 163 brain imaging studies to construct a highly detailed map of the brain regions activated during different types of reading tasks, from letters and words to sentences and passages.

A groundbreaking new study has found that adults who report avoidant attachment to their parents are significantly more likely to choose a childfree lifestyle, a trend that is increasingly visible in both Western societies and emerging in Thai urban areas. The research, which analyzes psychological factors influencing reproductive decisions, adds valuable context to ongoing discussions about declining birth rates and shifting family expectations worldwide.

As Thailand faces an alarming drop in national birth rates — the lowest in decades according to the National Economic and Social Development Council (Bangkok Post) — the findings are particularly relevant. While economic uncertainties and shifting societal roles have been widely acknowledged as drivers, the new study highlights the impact of family attachments and early-life emotional bonds on adult choices to remain childfree.

A growing body of global and local research is highlighting a worrying trend: the vast majority of children in Thailand, much like their peers in Hong Kong and around the world, are failing to meet the World Health Organization’s (WHO) recommendation of 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity every day. This shortfall—revealed by the latest studies and echoed by Thai education and health officials—raises concerns about the lasting impacts on academic performance, physical health, and mental wellbeing among the nation’s youth.

Imagine paying for a concert ticket, then waking up on the day of the event feeling sick as a tropical downpour soaks the city. Logic suggests you should stay home—your health is at risk, and the rain will make everything miserable. Yet, you force yourself to go, reasoning that if you don’t, your 2,000 baht ticket will be wasted. This everyday scenario, familiar to many Thais balancing spending and social obligations, illustrates the psychological trap known as the “sunk cost fallacy.” It is a common bias that leads people to continue investing time, money, or effort into a decision even when doing so no longer serves their best interest, all because they want to justify past, irretrievable investments. In a society where respect for personal sacrifice and resourcefulness is highly valued, understanding this phenomenon carries deep significance for both individual Thais and the nation as a whole.

A groundbreaking new study is challenging longstanding demographic wisdom by asserting that humanity’s current fertility rate is now too low to guarantee survival—even if average births per woman meet the historical “replacement” level. The research, led by a Japanese scientist and published in the journal PLOS One, argues that the global average of 2.1 children per woman simply isn’t enough. Instead, it suggests that a fertility rate of 2.7 is the true mark required to ensure humanity’s long-term prospects, a conclusion that carries serious implications for countries like Thailand, where the fertility rate is well below these thresholds.

A groundbreaking study led by researchers at the University of Leicester has revealed that some of the largest creatures ever to soar the prehistoric skies, the pterosaurs, spent far more time on the ground than previously thought. Through extensive examination of fossilised tracks attributed to the giant Quetzalcoatlus, with wingspans reaching up to 10 metres (32 feet), scientists have now painted a richer picture of the behaviour and lifestyle of these flying reptiles that coexisted with dinosaurs hundreds of millions of years ago (BBC News).

In a surprising shift, the Antarctic ice sheet has reportedly expanded for the first time in decades, according to a recent article by The Daily Galaxy (dailygalaxy.com). This development marks a significant reversal from the enduring narrative of relentless polar ice loss and has triggered widespread discussion in the scientific community about the complexities of climate change, ocean currents, and global weather patterns.

For years, research and satellite observations have documented a steady decline in both the Arctic and Antarctic ice sheets, with implications for rising sea levels and extreme weather events worldwide. Thailand, a country consistently ranked among the world’s most vulnerable to climate change-driven flooding, has closely monitored these polar trends. News of an expanding Antarctic ice sheet, therefore, raises critical questions: Is this a fleeting anomaly or a sign of deeper shifts in Earth’s climate system? And what might this mean for global strategies to address rising seas and environmental crises?

A groundbreaking new study has found that experiencing adversity during childhood can result in measurable damage to the brain’s white matter, a discovery that could transform how parents, educators, and policy-makers in Thailand approach the challenges facing vulnerable children. The research, highlighted by ScienceAlert, reveals that the effects of hardships such as abuse, neglect, or chronic stress do not just shape a child’s psychological wellbeing—they may also leave lasting marks on the physical structure of the developing brain.

A groundbreaking study published in Nature has delivered unexpected results in the scientific quest for understanding consciousness, challenging two of the most prominent theories about its origins and offering fresh insights with potential to reshape clinical neuroscience worldwide. The findings reveal that neither Integrated Information Theory (IIT) nor Global Neuronal Workspace Theory (GNWT)—the cornerstones of modern consciousness research—can fully account for how human conscious experience arises, redirecting scientific focus to the brain’s sensory areas and raising critical implications for patient care and brain injury diagnosis (Neuroscience News).

A new framework released in early May by a leading fintech group product manager is making waves throughout the global business and technology communities, urging organizations to reconsider the automatic use of large language models (LLMs) for every artificial intelligence (AI) application. The article, recently published by VentureBeat, cautions that LLMs—despite their popularity—are not always the best fit for all customer needs and often prove costly and imprecise compared to other machine learning (ML) or rules-based solutions (VentureBeat).

A growing body of research investigated in a recent article in The Atlantic challenges conventional wisdom about how boys should be raised, revealing that gendered parenting and cultural expectations may be holding back the emotional and developmental well-being of boys. These findings carry special significance for parents and educators in Thailand, where traditional models of masculinity often shape family and school life.

In societies around the world, including Thailand, the prevailing narrative says that boys must be tough, stoic, and emotionally restrained to succeed in life. This perspective, fueled by generations of social customs and amplified by contemporary social media influencers as well as political rhetoric, encourages boys to suppress feelings in favor of physical strength and competition. However, new studies suggest that such approaches run counter to boys’ actual developmental needs and may have long-term negative effects, not just for the boys themselves but for wider society as well.

Recent discussions on parenting have reignited interest in the methods used by earlier generations, sparking a debate about the timeless wisdom embedded in so-called “old-school” parenting approaches. While contemporary “gentle parenting” strategies have gained significant popularity, recent media coverage, including a widely shared article from YourTango, highlights how many traditional parenting methods still offer valuable insights for today’s families (YourTango). This renewed conversation is especially relevant as Thai parents examine the shifting landscape of family life and child development in the digital age.

Recent research and expert opinion highlight a growing trend worldwide: children are reaching puberty earlier than previous generations. This shift, described in a new book by a leading US clinical psychologist and echoed by global medical research, has deep implications for both physical and mental health. For Thai families, understanding what early puberty means—and how to support children through it—has never been more important.

Traditionally, puberty marked a transitional period from childhood to adolescence, typically starting around age 10 for girls and 12 for boys. But in recent years, doctors and parents alike have noticed that children as young as six are showing physical signs of development, outpacing their emotional and cognitive maturity. As Thai society becomes increasingly urbanized and children’s free time shrinks—driven by academic pressures and technology—this gap between body and mind is widening. According to the US psychologist cited in the Boston Globe report, ages six to 12 are now seen as the most crucial window for parents to influence and guide children before they are swept up in the whirlwind of adolescence.

New scientific research from Japan is shedding light on a remarkable role of sleep: it does not just safeguard our memories of the past, but also equips the brain for learning and adapting to the future. The findings, published in the prestigious journal Nature Communications, offer insights that are poised to reshape education strategies and approaches to memory health, with clear significance for individuals and policymakers in Thailand.

For generations, Thais—like people worldwide—have held age-old beliefs about the power of a good night’s sleep. Apart from its value for physical health, sleep has long been assumed to help “remember” lessons, from Buddhist scripture memorization in temples to late-night cramming before university examinations. This study by researchers led by a professor at the University of Toyama delivers fresh, concrete scientific evidence that gives new meaning to those cultural insights—and may even offer new paths to address memory-related diseases, a rising concern as Thailand’s population ages.