#Educationreform

A new study suggests that people who show ADHD traits experience boredom more readily because their brains struggle with regulating attention and keeping information in working memory. The findings, drawn from a series of cognitive tasks and self-report measures, indicate that the tendency toward boredom in ADHD-like individuals may be partly explained by core executive function weaknesses, especially sustained attention and interference control. The researchers say this work provides a clearer picture of the cognitive processes behind boredom and points to potential interventions that could help students stay engaged, a finding with clear relevance for Thailand’s education system where classroom focus can directly affect learning outcomes and family well-being.

The latest wave of demographic research suggests America is teetering on a “demographic cliff.” Birth rates have fallen for years, aging workers are thinning the ranks, and colleges, businesses, and urban planners are scrambling to respond. The result could slow growth, strain social services, and force a rapid rethinking of how the economy trains, recruits, and retains talent. For readers in Thailand, where aging populations and shifting workforce needs are already reshaping policy and everyday life, the message is clear: demographic change is not distant—it is happening now, and no country remains untouched.

A recent review of North Carolina school districts found that a substantial number lack written policies on classroom use of artificial intelligence, raising fresh questions about preparedness, equity and academic integrity that resonate far beyond the United States. The review examined 26 districts and found 17 had formal policies guiding AI use in classrooms while eight districts reported no policy and one district did not respond, highlighting inconsistent district-level responses to a technology which educators say is already reshaping teaching and learning. At the same time, controlled trials from U.S. universities show measurable academic benefits when chatbots and AI tools are integrated thoughtfully, suggesting that absence of policy does not mean absence of potential. For Thai educators, policymakers and parents, the North Carolina snapshot offers a cautionary example: without coordinated guidance and teacher training, schools risk both missed opportunities and harms related to cheating, bias, and widened digital divides.

A recent review of North Carolina school districts shows many lack formal policies on how AI is used in classrooms. The finding highlights questions about preparedness, equity, and integrity that matter well beyond the United States. The study looked at 26 districts; 17 had written policies, eight had no formal guidance, and one did not respond. Educators say AI is already reshaping teaching, so policy gaps could affect implementation. Controlled trials in U.S. universities indicate measurable benefits when AI tools are integrated thoughtfully, but absence of policy does not negate potential. For Thai educators, policymakers, and parents, the North Carolina snapshot offers a cautionary example: without clear guidance and teacher training, schools risk missed opportunities and harms such as cheating, bias, and widening digital gaps.

A leading neuroscientist is reigniting debate over the voting age by arguing that 16-year-olds possess the cognitive skills needed to cast ballots responsibly, citing both neurological development and international examples as evidence. The discussion, sparked by a recent article in The Times, is gaining traction in countries considering electoral reform—including those, like Thailand, where youth political engagement has surged in recent years.

At a time when several democracies are weighing whether to lower their voting ages, neuroscientific research offers powerful new insights. According to the neuroscientist interviewed by The Times, teenagers aged 16 can reason, reflect, and make considered decisions—skills grounded in “cold cognition,” or logical thinking in calm settings. These cognitive abilities, the expert explains, develop enough by mid-adolescence to underpin mature choices at the ballot box.

Groundbreaking neuroscience research has ignited international debates about democratic participation by demonstrating that 16-year-olds possess the cognitive sophistication necessary for responsible electoral decision-making, challenging traditional assumptions about adolescent political competence that could transform Thailand’s approach to youth civic engagement. Leading brain scientists present compelling evidence that teenagers develop crucial “cold cognition” abilities—logical reasoning under calm conditions—that enable thoughtful ballot choices, while Thailand’s recent surge in youth political activism provides real-world validation of adolescent civic sophistication that demands serious reconsideration of voting age restrictions.

A wave of neuroscience findings is reigniting the debate over voting age in Thailand. Researchers indicate that 16-year-olds can exhibit the cognitive maturity required for responsible electoral decision-making, challenging long-held assumptions about adolescent political competence. The evidence points to strong “cold cognition”—the ability to reason calmly and carefully—which aligns with the quiet, private act of voting. In parallel, Thailand has seen a surge in youth political activism, adding real-world relevance to the science and underscoring the need to reconsider youth civic engagement and electoral participation.

Comprehensive new research examining academic performance across public and private educational institutions reveals a nuanced landscape that challenges conventional assumptions about school choice effectiveness, with findings that carry significant implications for Thailand’s ongoing education reform debates. This groundbreaking analysis of standardized test results demonstrates that private school advantages vary dramatically based on the quality and resources of surrounding public education systems, suggesting that simplistic comparisons between school types may mislead policymakers and families making crucial educational decisions.

A newly released investigation analyzing standardized test scores from Ohio’s schools reveals sharp contrasts between public and private institutions—findings that may influence similar policy discussions and education choices in Thailand. Amid a massive expansion of Ohio’s school voucher program, the study presents key insights on how private schools perform compared to their public counterparts, prompting questions about the value of “school choice” and its implications for educational equity.

Recent changes by Ohio lawmakers have dramatically broadened the eligibility of families to receive publicly funded vouchers, enabling more students to enroll in private schools at the state’s expense. This legislative shift has driven voucher spending to nearly $1 billion annually according to Dayton Daily News. The effect is twofold: families now enjoy greater school choice, but clear, comparative data guiding these pivotal decisions remains limited.

A new, comprehensive study analyzes academic performance across public and private schools and finds that the benefits of private education are not universal. Instead, advantages shift based on the quality of surrounding public schools. For Thai readers, the findings offer important lessons for ongoing education reform and policy design.

Researchers collected data from diverse regions to compare performance in core subjects like English and mathematics. The work aims to give families solid, objective information amid growing voucher programs and school-choice discussions. Using careful statistical controls, the study accounts for variables such as demographics, resources, and school selection effects that often complicate comparisons.

A town hall in Idaho has intensified debate over a new school voucher program, signaling broader concerns about public funding for private education. Held at Idaho State University and attended by about 200 residents, the event mirrors global worries about public schools’ sustainability and offers lessons for Thailand as policymakers consider similar reforms.

Organized by a local education advocacy group, the gathering discussed Idaho’s HB 93, signed into law in early 2025. The measure allocates state funds—about 50 million dollars—as a parental tax credit to help families cover private school tuition. The program provides up to 5,000 dollars per student, with enhanced support for students with disabilities. Panelists described the funds as refundable tax credits that reduce state revenue before other public services are funded.

A recent town hall in Pocatello, Idaho has brought national attention to the intensifying debate over the state’s new school voucher program, with local educators and administrators warning of “severe” economic, social, and academic repercussions if public funding is diverted to private education. The event, held at Idaho State University and attended by roughly 200 community members, highlights a growing unease about the sustainability of public schools not only in Idaho but across the United States—and raises parallel questions for Thailand as policymakers here consider similar reforms.

A quiet crisis is emerging in classrooms worldwide and now affecting Thai students: emotionally-based school avoidance, or EBSA. New international research shows more children miss school due to anxiety, depression, and other emotional distress. In the United Kingdom, studies indicate a fivefold rise in students missing more than half of their school days over the past decade, reflecting the lingering effects of the Covid-19 era.

EBSA is not simply refusal to attend. It describes students who feel unable to go to school because of overwhelming emotional or physical distress. The key distinction is that “I can’t” reflects a mental health and support challenge, not just discipline. This reframing guides how schools respond and support students.

The number of students skipping school due to emotional distress—termed emotionally-based school avoidance (EBSA)—has soared in recent years, raising alarms among educators, healthcare professionals, and parents worldwide. Recent research from the UK highlights a five-fold increase in children missing more than half of their school days over the past decade, with experts pointing to the lingering repercussions of the Covid-19 pandemic as a key factor driving this concerning trend (BBC News).

As artificial intelligence (AI) rapidly disrupts workplaces worldwide, a new data-driven analysis highlights which professions are most resistant to automation—a question increasingly relevant to Thai job seekers, policymakers, and educators as the digital landscape evolves. The rankings, visualized by Visual Capitalist using data from Esquimoz, underscore that jobs requiring public interaction, emotional intelligence, and hands-on technical skills remain the most protected against AI encroachment Visual Capitalist.

The significance of this ranking resonates strongly in Thailand, a country where economic modernization and workforce adaptability play a central role in national development plans such as Thailand 4.0. As industries integrate AI and automation to boost productivity, concerns have grown regarding the future viability of certain careers. The latest findings offer a reassuring message: not all jobs are equally vulnerable, and those demanding empathy, complex judgment, and direct human involvement are hardest to automate.

A data-driven analysis reveals which professions resist automation, offering guidance for Thai job seekers, educators, and policymakers as the digital economy evolves. Visual Capitalist visualizations, based on data from Esquimoz, show that roles requiring public interaction, emotional intelligence, and hands-on technical skills remain the safest from AI encroachment.

In Thailand, the findings align with modernization aspirations under Thailand 4.0, which prioritizes upskilling and adaptability. As industries adopt AI to boost productivity, concerns about job viability persist. The latest results reassure that some careers stay resilient because they rely on human judgment, empathy, and direct involvement.

A recent Lumina Foundation-Gallup survey shows a notable rebound in public confidence in higher education in the United States—the first uptick in a decade. While focused on the U.S., the findings offer timely lessons for Thai readers about credibility, relevance, and public engagement in universities. The study reports that 42 percent of Americans now express a great deal or quite a lot of confidence in colleges, up six points from the previous year and the highest level since 2015. The shift follows years of debate over debt, cost, and campus culture.

In a remarkable reversal of years-long decline, public confidence in higher education has risen among Americans for the first time in a decade, according to a new Lumina Foundation-Gallup survey published on July 16, 2025 by The Chronicle of Higher Education (chronicle.com). The survey found that 42 percent of Americans now say they have either “a great deal” or “quite a lot” of confidence in colleges — a six-point increase over the previous year’s levels and the highest reading since 2015.

Boston University’s bold experiment to reverse the longstanding gender gap in computer and data science is defying national trends, according to a recent feature by the university (Boston University). While women comprise about half the workforce in the United States, they remain woefully underrepresented in the booming fields of technology and data: barely 15-20% of professionals in data science are women, and women-led start-ups and founding teams are even scarcer.

A U.S. university is reshaping how women enter computer and data science, offering a model that could guide Thailand’s push into a robust digital economy. While women make up nearly half of the workforce in the United States, they remain underrepresented in technology and data roles. In data science, women account for roughly 15-20 percent, and female-led startups are still scarce. Diverse teams drive more innovative solutions and better decisions.

The passage from secondary school to university marks a profound transformation in family relationships—a reality increasingly recognized by Thai parents as their children head off to college. Recent discussions in international media, such as a feature in Business Insider about evolving parent-child dynamics when children attend university, are amplifying a topic that resonates strongly within Thailand’s own households. As more families engage with higher education, they are encountering new challenges—and opportunities—for connection, growth, and mutual understanding.

Thai families are navigating a quiet but meaningful shift as children head to university. The experience is more than academic; it reshapes daily life, expectations, and relationships. Experts note that higher education can open doors to greater independence while strengthening trust between parents and children.

Leaving home for university brings a mix of excitement and anxiety. For many Thai families, a child’s move—whether to another province or abroad—signals new opportunities for growth and mutual respect. Thai culture has long valued close intergenerational bonds. As youths become more autonomous, parents transition from daily caregivers to mentors who trust rather than control.

The US Supreme Court has given the green light for former President Donald Trump’s administration to significantly downsize the federal Department of Education, a move that slashes the agency’s workforce by nearly half and could fundamentally reshape the American educational landscape. This landmark decision, permitting mass firings and large-scale buyouts, not only spotlights sharp ideological divides in US education policy, but also sends signals around the world about the future of government involvement in public education.

A landmark Supreme Court decision clears the path for a substantial downsizing of the federal Department of Education, potentially cutting nearly half the agency’s staff and reshaping how federal programs are run. The ruling raises questions about equity, accountability, and the national role in public schooling.

For Thai readers, the development is especially relevant as Bangkok and provincial authorities debate decentralization and greater local autonomy in schooling. The US example offers both caution and insight about the risks and opportunities when central oversight is reduced, and it highlights how nationwide standards can be balanced with community empowerment.