#Ethics

For families who have lost someone close, the first months after a death are a time of memory and closure. But a quiet, unsettling question has begun to surface in research rooms and newsroom desks: could AI-generated representations of people who have died—voices, faces, even entire personas—be used to relive the past in ways that alter how we remember them? The question is not merely about technology hype. It touches on memory, consent, dignity, and how societies, including Thailand, handle the digital afterlife in a culture rooted in reverence for elders, ancestors, and the stories we tell about them.

A provocative argument is gaining traction in scientific circles: the long-dominant materialist view of science may be narrowing our questions, and gatekeeping alternatives could be slowing progress. The lead voice in this debate, a theoretical physicist and neuroscientist, argues that to push knowledge forward we must interrogate the gaps in our current theories rather than resorting to rigid reverence for material explanations alone. The conversation reverberates beyond laboratories and conference rooms, touching the heart of how Thailand teaches, discusses, and applies science in everyday life. For Thai families, students, and policy makers alike, the question is whether our educational and media ecosystems encourage open inquiry without surrendering the standards of rigorous evidence that protect public trust.

A recent review of North Carolina school districts shows many lack formal policies on how AI is used in classrooms. The finding highlights questions about preparedness, equity, and integrity that matter well beyond the United States. The study looked at 26 districts; 17 had written policies, eight had no formal guidance, and one did not respond. Educators say AI is already reshaping teaching, so policy gaps could affect implementation. Controlled trials in U.S. universities indicate measurable benefits when AI tools are integrated thoughtfully, but absence of policy does not negate potential. For Thai educators, policymakers, and parents, the North Carolina snapshot offers a cautionary example: without clear guidance and teacher training, schools risk missed opportunities and harms such as cheating, bias, and widening digital gaps.

A new international study shows artificial intelligence is reshaping scientific publishing, with large language models increasingly assisting writing across disciplines. The study, highlighted by Nature Human Behaviour and summarized for the public, reveals that AI-generated text is influencing abstracts and introductions in many fields, including computer science. The shift has sparked excitement for faster writing and concerns about accuracy, originality, and access to AI tools for researchers in non-native English-speaking countries.

A groundbreaking analysis published in a leading scientific journal confirms rising concerns about fraud in global research. Sophisticated networks manufacture counterfeit studies at industrial scale, threatening medical advancement, technology, and policy making worldwide. The study, led by data scientists from a major U.S. university and echoed across international media, shows how coordinated schemes infiltrate high-impact journals. As Thailand grows its research base, this issue directly affects how universities, hospitals, and policymakers use scientific evidence to guide health, education, and innovation.

As mental health services globally face unprecedented demand and resource shortages, many individuals are increasingly turning to generative AI chatbots like ChatGPT for emotional support and advice. While the promise of 24/7, non-judgmental responses is appealing to those in distress, new research and expert commentary warn of significant psychological and ethical risks in relying on AI as a substitute for traditional therapy. This latest debate, captured in a thought-provoking commentary published in The Guardian on August 3, 2025, highlights the pressing need for Thai readers to critically evaluate the role of AI in mental healthcare and to consider cultural and societal implications (The Guardian).

A quiet crossroads is emerging in Thailand as millions turn to AI chatbots for support with fears, relationships, and stress. What starts as a convenient option amid scarce services could risk shaping how Thais experience emotion and maintain genuine connections.

Research and expert observations indicate that heavy reliance on algorithmic guidance may erode people’s ability to navigate real-life conflicts. While AI offers round-the-clock availability and non-judgmental responses, professionals warn that this may undermine essential aspects of traditional therapy, such as confronting difficult questions and reading non-verbal cues.

Across Thailand’s bustling cities and remote villages, a quiet revolution unfolds in smartphone screens and computer monitors. Millions turn to artificial intelligence chatbots seeking solace for their deepest fears, relationship troubles, and mental anguish. What begins as a convenient alternative to scarce mental health services, however, may be creating unprecedented psychological risks that experts warn could fundamentally alter how Thais process emotions and maintain authentic human relationships.

Recent international research published in The Guardian reveals alarming patterns among individuals who increasingly rely on AI-generated emotional guidance. Clinical psychologists document cases where patients become so dependent on algorithmically crafted responses that they lose the ability to navigate genuine interpersonal conflicts. The phenomenon represents more than technological convenience—it signals a profound shift in how societies approach emotional well-being during times of crisis.

A state education official in Oklahoma is under intense scrutiny after revelations surfaced that, while mandating the display of Bibles in public school classrooms, he allegedly kept nude photographs on his work computer. The growing scandal raises profound questions about educational leadership, the role of religion in public schools, and the standards to which public servants are held. For Thai readers, this controversy invites comparison with Thailand’s own debates about moral standards in educational policy, the separation of personal conduct from professional responsibility, and religious influence within state institutions.

A senior Oklahoma education official is under intense scrutiny after reports that he ordered Bible displays in every public school classroom and, separately, that nude photographs appeared on a state-issued device. The case raises questions about leadership, church-state boundaries, and public trust, and it resonates with Thai readers concerned about how religion, ethics, and policy intersect in education.

The dispute centers on the state education chief, who argued that Bible displays reinforce traditional values and moral guidance in schools. Investigations indicate the same official had nude images on a government device uncovered during an internal review. This juxtaposition fuels a broader discussion about whether public schools should endorse religious materials and how a leader’s private conduct should influence accountability.

As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to dazzle—and sometimes unsettle—the world with its feats, a new philosophical debate is taking shape: if machines can excel at everything humans do, what is left that is uniquely and intrinsically human? A recent essay in Psychology Today challenges readers to reexamine where humanity’s real value lies as AI systems master not only menial but also creative, empathetic, and intellectual tasks at unprecedented speed and depth (psychologytoday.com).

As artificial intelligence advances, a critical question emerges: if machines can perform many human tasks, what remains distinctly human? A recent Psychology Today piece invites readers to rethink where real value lies when AI handles not only routine work but creative, empathetic, and intellectual tasks at speed and depth. For Thai audiences, this question resonates with a culture that prizes craftsmanship, personal service, and elder wisdom—the human touch that AI now mirrors in surprising ways.

Artificial intelligence tools, including chatbots and virtual companions, are increasingly used in Thailand. This rise brings promise for expanding mental health support in hospitals and eldercare, while also raising concerns about potential risks. Thai readers now encounter AI-powered apps for study help, entertainment, and guidance, making balanced coverage essential.

Research and clinical experience suggest AI can enhance access to care, yet unusual psychiatric cases linked to AI interactions warrant careful monitoring. Reports of AI-related distress emphasize the need for vigilant evaluation, safety measures, and ongoing research. Experts caution that causation is not proven, but these episodes underscore the importance of safeguarding vulnerable users as technology grows more capable.

In a world where boundaries between technology and humanity are blurring, a growing number of people are forming deep, even marital, relationships with artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, challenging long-held assumptions about love, companionship, and the human psyche. A recent feature by The Guardian explores the touching, complex, and sometimes controversial stories of individuals who have married or formed romantic bonds with AI personalities, highlighting a new dimension of digital life that is rapidly gaining attention worldwide, including in Thailand.

A global wave of interest in artificial intelligence is reshaping ideas of love, companionship, and identity. Across the world, people form deep bonds with AI chatbots, and some even marry their digital partners. Thai audiences are increasingly curious about how these trends intersect with culture, family, and well-being.

In one widely reported example, an American user grew from curiosity to emotional attachment with a generative AI chatbot on the Replika platform, culminating in a digital wedding. This case reflects a broader online community where people seek friendship, comfort, or deeper partnerships with AI. Data from researchers and social observers show similar stories emerging in many countries, including Thailand, where digital tools increasingly accompany daily life.

A July 2025 study investigates a subtle social dynamic: why people often refrain from publicly excusing others’ moral slip-ups, even when harm seems minimal. The research, summarized by health and science outlets, examines how public judgment shapes social trust, community norms, and everyday interactions.

For Thai readers, the findings fit a culture that values social harmony and respectful conduct. Concepts like face-saving and conflict avoidance influence responses to cheating, lying, or petty theft. The study encourages reflection on the pressures witnesses feel when choosing whether to excuse or condemn behavior in public.

A groundbreaking study published in July 2025 is shedding light on a longstanding human behavior: the reluctance to publicly dismiss or excuse the wrongdoings of others, even when no one is directly harmed. The research, which has been reported by MedicalXpress, delves into why individuals hesitate to downplay moral transgressions in public settings, offering important insights into the complexities of social dynamics, moral judgment, and community cohesion.

This new study’s focus is significant for contemporary Thai society, where public expressions of morality and group harmony are longstanding values. Thai readers are likely to recognize the tension between wanting to maintain face (rak sa na) in social situations and the cultural emphasis on sanuk (enjoyment) and sabai (comfort), which sometimes encourage turning a blind eye to small misdeeds. The study’s findings raise questions about the pressures faced by individuals who witness ethical slip-ups—such as cheating, lying, or minor thefts—but choose not to excuse such behaviour publicly.

Emerging research from a renowned American liberal arts college is offering fresh insights into how computer technology both empowers and challenges today’s classrooms—a duality increasingly relevant as Thai schools and universities embrace digital learning. A recent article, “Inside the classroom: The gifts and burdens of computer technology,” details the evolving approach of the “Computers and Society” course at Lafayette College, exposing students—not just in computer science but across disciplines—to the profound social, ethical, and legal choices driven by rapid technological advancement. The findings and practices from this course offer timely lessons for Thailand, where digital literacy and critical analysis of technology’s effects are urgent educational priorities.

Pope Leo XIV has called on world leaders, tech innovators, and global citizens to ensure the development of artificial intelligence (AI) is guided by ethics, human dignity, and the promotion of peaceful societies. In a message delivered during the AI for Good Summit in Geneva on July 10, 2025, the pontiff urged the international community to establish robust frameworks and regulations that put the “common good” at the center of the AI revolution. As artificial intelligence increasingly shapes key sectors from healthcare and education to governance, the Pope’s intervention underlines mounting concerns about the pace and direction of AI development worldwide.

Emerging research from a well-regarded American college offers timely insights into how computer technology can empower and challenge learning environments. The “Computers and Society” course at Lafayette College explores social, ethical, and legal questions raised by rapid digital change. For Thailand, where digital literacy and critical analysis of technology’s effects are pressing educational priorities, the course serves as a relevant blueprint.

A central idea is simple yet powerful: technology is like fire—a gift that brings benefits but also risks. Drawing on the work of technologist Sara Baase, instructors emphasize that while risks exist, the benefits of innovation should not be discarded. In practice, students are guided to question, debate, and scrutinize the challenges accompanying each new breakthrough.

A recent international dialogue on AI ethics, highlighted by a Vatican-led call for human-centered guidelines, resonates with Thai perspectives on community, respect, and responsible innovation. At the AI for Good Summit in Geneva, church and industry leaders urged leaders and technologists to place human dignity and peaceful societies at the heart of the AI revolution, aligning with core Thai cultural values of care and shared wellbeing.

Thailand stands at a pivotal moment in digital transformation. The rapid spread of AI offers opportunities for growth but also raises concerns about equity, privacy, and social cohesion. Thai policymakers, educators, business leaders, and citizens alike are called to consider these issues as technology advances, ensuring progress benefits all segments of society.

A new artificial intelligence (AI) system, developed by international researchers, is turning heads worldwide for its uncanny ability to predict human decisions with unprecedented accuracy—raising both hopes of revolutionary applications and urgent questions about privacy and ethics. This breakthrough, recently published in the journal Nature, introduces the AI model “Centaur”, which has outperformed decades-old cognitive models in forecasting how people think, learn, and act across diverse scenarios (studyfinds.org).

Centaur’s creators set out with an ambitious goal: develop a single AI system capable of predicting human behaviour in any psychological experiment, regardless of context or complexity. To achieve this, they compiled a massive “Psych-101” dataset spanning 160 types of psychological tests—ranging from memory exercises and risk-taking games to moral and logical dilemmas—amassing data from over 60,000 people and more than 10 million separate decisions. Unlike traditional models tuned for specific tasks, Centaur was trained to generalise, understanding the plain-language descriptions of each experiment.

A groundbreaking AI system is drawing attention for its ability to forecast human choices with impressive accuracy. Published in Nature, the Centaur model seeks to predict how people think, learn, and decide across diverse tasks. The research team says Centaur generalizes beyond single experiments, offering new ways to study decision-making in real time.

Centaur was trained on a vast “Psych-101” dataset containing 160 types of psychological tests. The data come from more than 60,000 participants and over 10 million decisions. The system learns language-driven task descriptions rather than task-specific rules. Unlike older models designed for narrow tasks, Centaur aims to apply broad reasoning to novel experiments.

A bold new wave of speculation about artificial intelligence has reignited debate among scientists and the public alike, as a prominent computer scientist and futurist asserts that humanity is on the verge of achieving the long-anticipated “singularity”—the theoretical moment when human and artificial intelligence fundamentally merge. According to the recently published book, “The Singularity is Nearer,” the extraordinary prediction is that this transformative event could occur within the next 20 years, powered by brain-embedded nanotechnology and exponential advances in computing power Yahoo News.