#Ethics

The accelerating progress of artificial intelligence has sparked an intense international debate about the future role of human beings in society, with leading thinkers warning that AI could soon outperform people at nearly every task — raising fundamental questions about human relevance in work, culture, and decision-making. As technologies grow more sophisticated and autonomous, experts urge communities, governments, and businesses to grapple with the possibility of a world where AI is “better at everything,” and to consider urgent societal adaptations.

In an era where artificial intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT and their rivals are reshaping the workplace, education, and even leisure activities, a notable segment of individuals are actively choosing to resist – or at least question – this digital transformation. As AI becomes an invisible hand guiding everything from web searches to music recommendations, the reluctance to embrace it reflects deeper concerns about human creativity, environmental costs, and the fabric of genuine social connection BBC News.

Why do people so often comply with authority—even when orders contradict their conscience? New neuroscience research is beginning to provide concrete answers to this age-old question, illuminating the brain mechanisms that drive obedience and the social pressures that can make compliance nearly automatic. Drawing upon insights from the recent feature, “Why We Follow Orders: The Neuroscience of Compliance and Control” in Skeptic magazine, this report examines what scientists have uncovered, why these findings matter in everyday Thai life, and what we can do to foster greater ethical autonomy.

In an era of ongoing social, political, and workplace challenges where authority and individual will often collide, understanding why people obey orders is more relevant than ever for Thai society. Recent discussions sparked by “Why We Follow Orders: The Neuroscience of Compliance and Control,” a feature on the Michael Shermer Show, have brought new research to the public eye, shedding light on the brain mechanisms and situational dynamics that drive human compliance. This emerging field offers crucial lessons not only for authorities and educators but also for anyone navigating the fine line between following instructions and maintaining personal agency.

A new study using pioneering brain-machine interface technology has found that when people intend to move, they perceive their actions as happening more quickly than if the same movement is involuntary—a fascinating window into how intent shapes our perception of time and action. This discovery, published in PLOS Biology on April 17, may have major implications for debates about free will and could influence future therapies for people living with paralysis (source).

A growing number of people worldwide are opening up about their struggles not just with mental health, but with the very professionals meant to help them. Recent viral discussions, including a BuzzFeed article compiling stories of “terrible therapists,” are shining a harsh spotlight on problematic practices within the mental health industry (BuzzFeed). These personal accounts — ranging from therapists giving unsolicited advice to crossing ethical boundaries — are prompting experts and individuals alike to ask: how can we make sure mental health care is genuinely helpful, not harmful?