#Familydynamics

A new article published in June 2025 by clinical counselor and author Loriann Oberlin on Psychology Today is sparking discussion about the nuanced forms of passive-aggressive behavior and practical strategies for dealing with them. The research, rooted in Oberlin’s extensive clinical and consulting experience, provides insight into hidden negativity that can quietly erode relationships at work, at home, and beyond—and calls on individuals to recognize these behaviors and actively reclaim agency in their interactions (Psychology Today).

A newly discussed piece by clinical counselor Loriann Oberlin in Psychology Today explores subtle forms of passive-aggressive behavior and practical strategies to address them. Drawing on her clinical experience, the article highlights hidden negativity that can quietly erode relationships at work, at home, and beyond. It urges readers to identify these behaviors and reclaim agency in everyday interactions.

In Thailand, social harmony, face-saving, and indirect communication are valued. Yet unresolved negativity and disguised hostility can fuel long-standing resentment and disrupt daily life—from family duties to office dynamics. Oberlin’s analysis arrives as Thai families and organizations navigate changing generational norms and increasingly complex social interactions online and offline.

The debate over whether a child is a “living room kid” or a “bedroom kid” is stirring interest among parents, psychologists, and educators across the globe, with implications resonating right here in Thailand. As new parenting trends sweep through social media, the question of where children prefer to spend their time at home is emerging as a unique lens into family dynamics, parenting styles, and even children’s mental health.

This topic’s rise in prominence reveals more than just quirks—it speaks to the core of childhood safety, comfort, and the way Thai families can nurture their home environments. According to a recent feature in the New York Post, the choice between shared family spaces and private bedrooms is far from trivial. Experts argue that a child’s preferred environment reveals important clues about their personality, developmental stage, and underlying feelings of security within the family.

A recent global debate on where children prefer to spend time—shared living spaces vs. private bedrooms—offers new insight into family dynamics, parenting styles, and child well-being. In Thailand, this discussion resonates as urban living, multi-generational households, and compact homes shape daily life for many families.

Leading research suggests that a child’s preferred space can reflect safety, comfort, and emotional needs. Living room kids gravitate toward communal areas like the living room, kitchen, and dining room. They tend to be expressive, playful, and closely connected to family activities. Experts describe these children as finding “the sound of safety, comfort, and connection” in the bustle of home life.

A new study finds that how parents respond during conflicts with their adolescent daughters may help predict the emergence of suicidal thoughts. The findings emphasize the power of family interactions in shaping mental health outcomes for Thai youth and beyond. This research adds to growing evidence that supportive, validating parenting during disagreements can act as a protective factor, while harsh or emotionally withdrawn responses may intensify distress.

In Thailand, traditional family norms and the stigma around mental health can complicate parent-child communication. Teen suicide remains a serious concern, and data from mental health authorities indicate rising concern among youth. Experts say that open, compassionate dialogue during conflicts can reduce feelings of isolation and hopelessness, whereas critical or dismissive behavior can worsen emotional strain.

A new study suggests that the manner in which parents respond during conflicts with their adolescent daughters may be a significant predictor of suicidal thoughts in these girls, highlighting a crucial dynamic in family interactions that could impact mental health outcomes. This research, recently covered by PsyPost, offers valuable insights for families, educators, and mental health professionals grappling with the rising tide of youth mental health issues in Thailand and beyond.

The notion that fathers “babysit” when caring for their own children has come under renewed scrutiny, as new research highlights the detrimental effects of gendered parenting roles on both caregivers and their children. A recent article by Dr. Kate Balestrieri stresses that calling a father’s involvement “babysitting” is not merely an innocent slip of the tongue, but a reflection of deep-seated inequities in emotional and domestic responsibilities within households. This issue resonates widely, with significant implications for Thai society as evolving gender norms intersect with longstanding cultural expectations.

A growing body of research challenges the idea that fathers are merely “babysitting” when they care for their own children. Experts say the language we use signals deeper inequities in emotional and domestic responsibilities. For Thai families, evolving gender norms intersect with traditional expectations, making this an especially timely topic.

Across the globe, mothers have long been portrayed as the default caregivers, with fathers celebrated for occasional involvement. New insights, however, show that even in households where both parents work, women often shoulder more childcare and housework. A widely cited study by Bianchi and colleagues highlights how women spend more time on domestic duties than men, regardless of employment status. In Thailand, such patterns echo domestic realities and influence family health and harmony.

In a shift from the long-held belief that parenting is the primary force in determining a child’s outcomes, a growing body of research indicates that siblings may play an equally significant—if not greater—role in molding each other’s personalities, achievements, and life trajectories. This fresh perspective, featured in the latest cover story of The New York Times Magazine, draws on a range of recent studies examining the “sibling spillover effect,” and is prompting both researchers and families globally, including those in Thailand, to reconsider just how children influence one another within the family unit (NYTimes).

A growing body of research challenges the idea that parenting is the sole driver of a child’s outcomes. Studies on the “sibling spillover effect” indicate that brothers and sisters can influence each other’s personalities, achievements, and life paths as much as, or even more than, parents. The latest adaptation of this theme appears in a recent cover story by The New York Times Magazine, drawing on multiple studies to explore how siblings shape one another. In Thailand, as in many countries, families are rethinking how sibling relationships contribute to development and success.

A growing body of research highlights how growing up with persistently negative parents can have significant and lasting effects on children, even shaping behaviors and well-being well into adulthood. According to insights from psychologists featured in Parade’s recent article, individuals raised in such environments often manifest distinct emotional and behavioral patterns, prompting renewed calls in Thailand and globally to address the intergenerational impacts of parental negativity on mental health Parade.

The relevance of this issue resonates strongly in Thai society, where family ties and respect for elders are central cultural values. However, new research demonstrates that a family environment dominated by criticism, pessimism, or negativity can inadvertently sow long-term challenges for children. These challenges can manifest as self-doubt, chronic anxiety, difficulties in forming relationships, or a tendency to expect the worst, potentially hindering personal growth and success.

Growing evidence shows that children raised in consistently negative environments may carry emotional and behavioral patterns into adulthood. Psychologists cited in recent analyses note that persistent parental negativity can influence self-esteem, trust, and resilience, prompting renewed discussion worldwide and in Thailand about the intergenerational effects on mental health.

In Thai society, where family bonds and respect for elders run deep, these findings resonate with everyday life. A consistently critical or pessimistic home atmosphere can seed lasting challenges. Adults may experience self-doubt, anxiety, relationship difficulties, or a tendency to expect the worst, potentially hindering personal growth and success.

A groundbreaking new study has found that adults who report avoidant attachment to their parents are significantly more likely to choose a childfree lifestyle, a trend that is increasingly visible in both Western societies and emerging in Thai urban areas. The research, which analyzes psychological factors influencing reproductive decisions, adds valuable context to ongoing discussions about declining birth rates and shifting family expectations worldwide.

As Thailand faces an alarming drop in national birth rates — the lowest in decades according to the National Economic and Social Development Council (Bangkok Post) — the findings are particularly relevant. While economic uncertainties and shifting societal roles have been widely acknowledged as drivers, the new study highlights the impact of family attachments and early-life emotional bonds on adult choices to remain childfree.

A recent study signals a link between avoidant attachment to parents and a growing preference for a childfree life. The findings suggest that early emotional bonds shape adult decisions about parenthood, adding context to declines in birth rates and evolving family norms in Thailand and beyond.

Thailand faces a significant demographic challenge, with birth rates at historic lows. Data from national planning authorities show this trend intersects with economic uncertainty and changing gender roles. The new research adds another layer, showing that family attachments in childhood may influence whether adults choose not to have children.

Daycare workers around the world are increasingly grappling with a wave of unusual, demanding, and sometimes inappropriate requests from parents, according to recent reports and research, with frustration reaching a boiling point in the sector. As early childhood education faces mounting pressures post-pandemic, these revelations are shining a light on challenges that affect not only childcare providers but also Thai families navigating the evolving landscape of daycare services.

Interest in this issue has surged following a widely shared exposé published by the New York Post, where daycare workers anonymously shared some of the most unreasonable demands they’ve received from parents—from requiring staff to use gold-plated cutlery for a toddler’s lunch to covertly punishing other children on behalf of a parent’s grudge. While the stories sound sensational, they reflect a documented trend: the rise of what educators call “helicopter” and “lawnmower” parenting, where adults attempt to eliminate any perceived obstacle or stress from their child’s path.

Daycare workers worldwide report a surge in unusual and demanding requests from parents, reflecting mounting pressures in early childhood education after the pandemic. For Thai families navigating expanding daycare options, these insights underscore how expectations at home can influence classroom dynamics and staff wellbeing.

The conversation intensified after a widely shared exposé in a major outlet, where educators anonymously described extreme parental demands. Examples range from insisting on gold-plated utensils for a toddler’s lunch to covertly punishing other children on behalf of a parent’s grievance. While these anecdotes may seem sensational, they align with a broader pattern experts call helicopter and lawnmower parenting—parents who try to remove every obstacle from a child’s path.

A recent advice column published in Slate has ignited a nationwide conversation on adolescent privacy, focusing on the contentious issue of whether children and teens should be permitted to lock their bedroom doors at home. The column, titled “My Husband Doesn’t Want to Allow Our Daughter to Lock Her Door. But I Think She Might Have a Good Reason,” depicts a family conflict where parental attitudes about privacy and safety clash, raising complex questions about child development and family dynamics.

A recent advice column in Slate has sparked a nationwide discussion about adolescent privacy and whether children should be allowed to lock their bedroom doors. Titled “My Husband Doesn’t Want to Allow Our Daughter to Lock Her Door. But I Think She Might Have a Good Reason,” the piece depicts a family conflict over privacy, safety, and growing independence. It raises questions about child development and how families navigate evolving dynamics.

The long-standing rivalry between siblings has taken a new turn as recent research shines a spotlight on a surprising “villain” within Thai and global families—the older brother. A large-scale study from the University of Warwick suggests that birth order does matter, with older brothers more likely to become the family aggressors, especially when it comes to bullying their younger siblings. This revelation not only disrupts traditional assumptions about sibling dynamics but also raises important questions about long-term well-being, family culture, and childhood development in Thailand.

New research is reshaping how Thai families think about sibling dynamics. A large-scale study from the University of Warwick indicates that birth order matters more than many thought, with older brothers more likely to be the aggressors toward younger siblings. The finding challenges long-held assumptions about family harmony and raises important questions for Thai childhood development, education, and mental health.

Sibling rivalry is a universal theme, but its expressions are deeply shaped by culture. In Thailand, the elder son often carries traditional responsibilities, including guidance of younger siblings and care for aging parents. These expectations can influence behavior and emotional dynamics at home. The latest study adds nuance to this picture, suggesting that the eldest brother’s role can include a troubling tendency toward bullying, especially in larger families.

New research is redefining how birth order—being firstborn, middle, youngest, or an only child—affects health, not just personality. For Thai families, these findings matter as family structures shift, parental roles evolve, and conversations about mental health gain prominence. The debate in Thai households about elder siblings’ maturity or middle-child dynamics now sits alongside rigorous science about childhood immune development, anxiety and depression risk, and obesity.

Experts say birth order effects are complex and layered. Health insights consider personality, coping strategies, and stress management shaped by position in the family. A 2024 Epic Research study highlights notable trends: firstborns show higher rates of anxiety and depression compared with their younger siblings, while only children and last-borns appear more prone to childhood obesity. Meanwhile, middle and younger children may experience stronger immune responses, a pattern linked to early-life exposure to germs and the so-called hygiene hypothesis. These findings hold potential relevance for Thai parents navigating smaller family sizes and evolving mental health awareness.

A wave of new research is shedding light on the intriguing ways that your birth order—whether you’re a firstborn, middle child, youngest, or only child—can impact not just your personality, but also your risks for certain mental and physical health conditions. The longstanding folk wisdom about eldest siblings being responsible, middle children overlooked, and youngest siblings more carefree has some scientific roots—but the picture is far more complex, with direct relevance for families in Thailand and around the world.

A candid exchange about co-parenting between famous actors has sparked renewed interest in how separated parents can support teens. For Thai readers, the topic resonates as many families in Thailand navigate changing norms while balancing tradition and modern life. New research suggests that collaborative parenting—built on respect, open communication, and shared decisions—can boost adolescents’ autonomy, wellbeing, and sense of belonging.

Poehler and Arnett, parents to teens Abel and Archie, described on a popular podcast that co-parenting is an ongoing process of flexibility, learning from mistakes, and listening to their children. Their experience aligns with international studies that emphasize mutual respect and ongoing dialogue as essential ingredients for successful co-parenting during adolescence.

The recent candid conversation between comedic actors Amy Poehler and Will Arnett about co-parenting their teenage sons has sparked greater interest in the complexities and rewards of shared parenting following separation. As more Thai families mirror these global trends—balancing tradition and modernity—the latest research offers meaningful insights into how collaborative approaches can nurture adolescent autonomy, wellbeing, and a lasting sense of belonging in today’s evolving society (ABC News).

Poehler and Arnett—parents to teens Abel and Archie—recently shared on Arnett’s “SmartLess” podcast that their co-parenting journey is an ongoing process of flexibility, learning from mistakes, and supporting their children’s growth through listening and adaptability. Their reflections echo emerging international research, underscoring the value of mutual respect, open communication, and shared decision-making in modern co-parenting, especially when guiding adolescents through the critical years of self-discovery and independence.