#Familypolicy

In a world where birth rates are trending downward in many advanced economies, a fresh economic perspective points to a surprisingly simple lever: the role of men as more engaged, practical partners in parenting. The latest research, highlighted by a prominent economist, argues that when men share childcare and household duties more equitably, couples may decide to have more children. The implications are urgent for societies like South Korea, where fertility remains the lowest in the world, and aging demographics threaten long-term social and economic stability. Even as the study focuses on Korea, the findings resonate with broader concerns across Asia, including Thailand, where families face similar pressures from housing costs, work demands, and evolving gender norms.

Groundbreaking demographic research reveals a powerful correlation between America’s declining religiosity and plummeting birth rates, adding crucial cultural dimensions to economic explanations for the nation’s fertility crisis while providing stark warnings for Thailand’s even more severe population challenges. Comprehensive analysis from leading research institutions, including extensive reporting synthesis by major news outlets, detailed demographic studies from the Institute for Family Studies, and new data from the Pew Research Center’s 2023-2024 Religious Landscape Study, demonstrates that highly religious Americans consistently maintain much larger families than their secular counterparts, while the growing population of religiously unaffiliated individuals has dramatically reduced their fertility to levels comparable with the world’s lowest-birth-rate societies. The fertility gap between religious and secular Americans has widened significantly over recent decades, with researchers calculating that virtually the entire decline in U.S. fertility from 2012 to 2019 can be attributed to growing irreligion combined with the exceptionally low birth rates among non-religious populations. Most critically for Thai readers, these findings illuminate how cultural and spiritual institutions provide essential social scaffolding for family formation—scaffolding that Thailand has been rapidly losing through urbanization, secularization, and changing social values, contributing to the kingdom’s catastrophic fertility decline that now threatens long-term economic stability and intergenerational support systems.

A growing body of demographic research finds a clear association between declining religiosity in the United States and the nation’s falling birth rate, adding a cultural dimension to well-known economic explanations for fewer children. Recent reporting and data syntheses – notably a long-form piece in Newsweek summarizing experts’ views, a detailed demographic analysis posted by the Institute for Family Studies, and new estimates from the Pew Research Center’s 2023–24 Religious Landscape Study – show that Americans who are more religious tend to have larger families, while the religiously unaffiliated have had markedly fewer children in recent decades. At the same time, the number of people who identify as nonreligious has grown, meaning the fertility gap by religion now helps explain a meaningful share of the overall decline in U.S. births. These trends matter to Thailand because Thai fertility has fallen even more rapidly, and understanding cultural as well as economic drivers can help shape policies to stabilise family formation and cushion the social effects of population ageing. See the Pew report here, the Institute for Family Studies analysis here, and the CDC’s 2023 birth data here.

A new wave of demographic research shows a clear connection between rising secularism in the United States and falling birth rates. For Thai readers, the findings offer a crucial caution: cultural and social supports for families matter, and rapid changes in values can accelerate population decline if policy does not respond.

Across several large studies, highly religious Americans tend to have larger families than their secular peers. The share of Americans who identify as religiously unaffiliated has grown steadily, reaching about 29% in recent years. Importantly, women who attend religious services weekly tend to have roughly twice as many children as those who never attend. These patterns help explain much of the drop in national fertility observed since 2012, beyond economic factors alone.

A new wave of analysis is reshaping how we understand the ongoing drop in birth rates among wealthy nations. The research highlights a complex mix of economic, cultural, and social factors that influence family planning, with implications for public health, education systems, and social cohesion. For Thai readers, the discussion is especially relevant as Thailand faces similar demographic changes.

Across high-income countries, fertility has fallen to historic lows even as global population growth slows. Recent syntheses show total fertility rates dipping well below the replacement level of about 2.1 children per woman. Countries such as South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, and several European nations are recording rates around or below 1.2. Projections suggest fertility could continue to trend downward this century, with some forecasts indicating a world rate near 1.8 by 2100, though long-term estimates vary.

A wave of new scientific analysis is redefining how experts understand the ongoing decline in birth rates across wealthy countries, raising deep questions for the future of advanced economies including Thailand. The latest research, profiled in a recent Newsweek lead, points to a complex web of factors fueling the trend, with implications reaching far beyond family size–affecting national prosperity, social cohesion, and public health systems.

Rich nations around the world are witnessing historic lows in fertility, even as overall global population growth begins to plateau. According to authoritative sources such as Wikipedia’s synthesis of worldwide fertility data, the total fertility rate (TFR) in countries like South Korea, Taiwan, and Ukraine has dipped to 1.0 or lower, far below the “replacement rate” of approximately 2.1 necessary to maintain population levels. Similar declines are observed in Chile, China, Japan, Malta, Poland, and Spain, with TFR values at or below 1.2 (Wikipedia).

A wave of new research is reshaping what we know about fatherhood, suggesting that men’s brains undergo measurable, dynamic changes when they become parents—changes often echoing those long attributed to mothers. For Thai families watching the shifting roles of men in parenting and policymakers focused on child development, these findings open remarkable new windows into the neurobiology of caregiving and challenge prevailing cultural stereotypes.

Until recently, the concept of “mom brain” reigned supreme in popular culture and scientific study. Defined by both cognitive shifts and an emotional attunement toward a new child, much has been made about the brain and hormonal changes mothers experience. However, a growing body of work, including the latest research led by a US-based psychology professor at the University of Southern California, finds that becoming a father sparks a unique neurological and hormonal transformation—a phenomenon now being described as “dad brain” (wbur.org).

A wave of recent research is reshaping our understanding of fatherhood. Studies show that men’s brains can change in measurable, dynamic ways after becoming dads—changes that echo what has long been observed in mothers. For Thai families watching shifting parenting roles and for policymakers focused on child development, these findings reveal new insights into caregiving and challenge old stereotypes.

Historically, conversations about parenting often centered on “mom brain,” the idea that mothers undergo cognitive and emotional shifts after birth. Now, researchers from a leading US university report that fatherhood also triggers neurological and hormonal changes. The growing body of evidence suggests that dads engage in a biological process that supports caregiving, a development with broad implications for family life and public policy.

The world’s rapidly declining birth rates have ignited a cultural, political, and economic debate that has reached new prominence in 2025. Concerns surrounding fertility decline, its impacts on social structures, and emerging “pronatalist” movements—those actively promoting higher birth rates—have transitioned from quieter academic discussions to mainstream headlines in Thailand and beyond. The issue isn’t simply statistical: it touches on the future of economies, generational care, cultural norms, and even environmental discussions, prompting stakeholders across the globe to rethink whether “more babies” is the solution to looming demographic challenges.

A global shift in birth rates is sparking renewed debate about economy, family, and national resilience in 2025. As fertility declines, people are rethinking social support systems, aging populations, and what “more babies” would require in today’s world. In Thailand, the trend mirrors global patterns but with local nuances that shape policy and everyday life.

Globally, births per 1,000 people have eased to about 17 in 2024, down from around 19.6 in 2012. The causes are multifaceted: higher education and more women in the workforce, economic uncertainty, urban living, and shifting attitudes toward family life. In Thailand, fertility has fallen below replacement levels. Official data indicate that live births dipped to roughly 460,000 in 2025, with the total fertility rate continuing to decline. These numbers point toward an aging society and greater pressure on elder care and public finances.

In Sweden, a new archetype of masculinity is turning heads from Bangkok to New York: the “latte dad.” Sporting baby carriers and sipping cappuccinos at city cafes, these modern fathers devote generous government-paid time off to hands-on parenting, challenging gender norms and inspiring global curiosity. American mothers, facing the stark realities of a two-week maternity leave, are expressing envy at this Swedish phenomenon where fathers spend upward of a year at home with their newborns, strolling through city parks as beacons of positive masculinity and family engagement (New York Post).

A generational shift in attitudes toward parenthood among millennials is attracting global attention, with experts debating whether today’s young adults are “childless” by circumstance or proudly “child free” by choice. A recent series of opinion letters in The New York Times highlights the nuanced perspectives within this ongoing discussion, reflecting broader societal changes and raising important questions about the future of family, well-being, and society both in the United States and around the world, including Thailand. In examining the latest research and public debate, it becomes clear that decision-making on children among millennials is far more complex than previously assumed, as economic concerns, cultural values, and social expectations all play pivotal roles (New York Times).

A global conversation about millennial attitudes toward parenthood is intensifying. Experts explore whether today’s young adults are lacking children due to circumstance or are choosing a child-free lifestyle by design. Recent opinion letters in The New York Times reveal nuanced viewpoints that echo broader social transformations affecting families, well-being, and society—from the United States to Thailand. The debate shows that millennial decisions about children are shaped by economics, cultural values, and shifting expectations.

A new wave of research is challenging long-held beliefs about marriage vows, especially the pledge to stay together “in sickness and in health.” Findings published in the Journal of Marriage and Family and summarized by Psychology Today in May 2025 reveal a troubling pattern: women who fall ill in their 50s and early 60s face a significantly higher risk of divorce than men. For Thailand—with its rapidly aging population and evolving social norms—these insights touch at the heart of family resilience and gender equity.

A wave of new research is challenging long-held beliefs about the vows that bind couples—especially the promise to remain united “in sickness and in health.” Recent findings, published in the Journal of Marriage and Family and reported by Psychology Today in May 2025, reveal a surprising and deeply concerning trend: women who fall ill in their 50s and early 60s face a far greater risk of divorce than their male counterparts (psychologytoday.com). For Thailand—a country with a rapidly aging population and shifting social values—this revelation strikes at the heart of family resilience and gender equity.

A growing rise in gentle, respectful parenting is challenging physical and verbal punishment of children worldwide. In England, the debate has renewed focus on child rights, parental stress, and how laws reflect evolving attitudes. For Thai readers, this discourse prompts reflection on Thailand’s own traditions, laws, and approaches to discipline.

Traditional discipline has long circulated in many societies, often framed as “tough love” or necessary guidance. In 2025, social media moments have shown parents using infamous phrases, with children offering surprisingly loving, constructive replies. These viral exchanges illustrate a broad shift: parents are increasingly seeking alternatives to punitive methods, guided by research on long-term psychological effects. Research by major institutions highlights how negative parenting can shape self-worth and resilience.

A rising tide of modern parenting is directly challenging the physical and verbal punishment of children, igniting new debates about child rights, parental stress, and the legal status of corporal punishment worldwide—including in England, where the issue has come under fresh scrutiny. As discussion grows following high-profile endorsements of gentle, respectful parenting, Thai families and policymakers may find themselves reflecting on the country’s own traditions, laws, and cultural attitudes toward discipline.

A recently published European study has uncovered a deeply troubling trend in the world of late-life divorce: when wives in middle-aged marriages fall ill, the risk of divorce significantly increases, while the same does not hold true if it is the husband who becomes unwell. This discovery, revealed in February 2025 research appearing in the Journal of Marriage and Family and spotlighted in a widely-discussed article in Psychology Today, points to a persistent imbalance in marital roles and expectations that continue to shape the intimate lives of older adults across the globe—including in Thailand.

A European study published in the Journal of Marriage and Family finds a troubling pattern in late-life divorce: when wives in middle-aged marriages fall ill, the risk of separation rises sharply, while husbands’ illness does not trigger the same effect. The research, conducted from 2004 to 2022 with over 25,000 couples ages 50 to 64, highlights how gender expectations shape marital stability in later years. The findings were summarized in Psychology Today and are resonating with readers worldwide, including Thai audiences concerned about aging families and changing norms.

In a groundbreaking push for gender equality and better parental support, British fathers are being urged to join the world’s first “Dad strike”, amplifying demands for more generous paternity leave in the United Kingdom, where statutory provisions remain among the lowest in Europe. The movement is set to culminate in a public protest with fathers and their babies outside the Department for Business and Trade in London on June 11, aiming to pressure the government into reforming policies for dads and non-birthing partners. The campaign reflects growing international attention to the critical role of fathers in early childhood and the wider debate about work-life balance amid changing social norms.

British fathers are organizing the world’s first “Dad strike” to demand broader, better-paid paternity leave. The protest outside the Department for Business and Trade in London on June 11 aims to press the government for reforms that support dads and non-birthing partners. The movement underscores the growing recognition of fathers’ essential role in early childhood and the ongoing work-life balance debate.

For Thai readers, the issues resonate with Thailand’s own family policy debates and evolving family structures. In the UK, eligible fathers and non-birthing partners currently receive only two weeks of leave at a rate below the minimum wage, and self-employed co-parents receive no state support. In contrast, mothers can receive up to 90% of their average weekly earnings for the first six weeks, followed by a fixed rate for the next 33 weeks. Campaigners say these gaps reinforce gender inequality and limit children’s access to parental care. Research cited by advocates emphasizes the broader social costs of insufficient paternity support.

A growing wave of research and personal accounts highlights a striking contrast: many European countries embed children and families across daily life, while the United States often treats family needs as secondary. The gap affects childhood development, public health, and social cohesion, beyond mere parental convenience.

This discussion intensified after a viral Salon essay by a Philadelphia mother who traveled through Berlin, London, and Dublin, illustrating how European daily life supports families compared with the U.S. Her reflections align with social science findings and long-standing policy comparisons.

A powerful new wave of research and personal accounts is shining a spotlight on a persistent and striking divide: while European countries embrace children and families in nearly every sphere of life, American society remains hobbled by policies and attitudes that seem, at best, indifferent—and at worst, openly hostile—to children’s needs. The consequences reach far beyond inconvenience for parents, rippling through childhood development, public health, and even social cohesion.

This conversation about child-friendliness erupted once again following a viral first-person essay in Salon by a Philadelphia-based mother who described her travels through Berlin, London, and Dublin, highlighting the profound differences between Europe and the United States in daily life with children. Her observations draw attention to issues confirmed by social science research, expert commentary, and decades of comparative policy analysis.