#FoodCulture

A groundbreaking international study has shattered a long-held tenet of public health: that simply eating fewer calories and exercising more is the surest route to weight control. Instead, the research points to ultra-processed foods (UPFs) — industrial formulations containing five or more ingredients — as powerful, independent drivers of the global obesity epidemic, casting doubt on the decades-old mantra of ‘calories in, calories out’ as the full story behind weight gain. The findings, published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) and widely reported in reputable outlets such as the Washington Post, are sparking urgent debates among health experts and raising vital questions for Thailand’s food culture and public health strategy [Washington Post][PNAS article summary].

A major new study published this week in the journal Nature Medicine has found compelling evidence that even small quantities of processed meat may increase the risk of major diseases, such as type 2 diabetes, colorectal cancer, and heart disease. The research also found significant health risks tied to regular consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and trans fatty acids, sending ripples through health communities worldwide, including here in Thailand. For a nation where processed meats—like sausages, ham, and bacon—are popular in everyday diets and street food culture, these findings have urgent relevance for both policymakers and the general public.

Many Thais — especially in the rush of urban life, from Bangkok’s crowded condos to Chiang Mai’s hip cafés — have become fond of a particular modern routine: eating every meal with a screen in view. Whether it’s catching up on a K-drama over lunch, scrolling through TikTok with pad kra pao, or squeezing in a YouTube video between bites of tom yum goong, more and more people are combining food and digital media. But what does this say about our personalities and well-being? Recent research, highlighted in a feature from VegOut magazine, points to seven distinct personality traits common among people who can’t seem to eat without watching something, offering valuable insight for Thai readers navigating today’s always-connected lifestyle (VegOut).

The reputation of coconut oil as a “healthy superfood” is under renewed scrutiny following warnings from international nutrition experts and a wave of new research suggesting that its widely advertised health benefits may be seriously overstated. This development has significant implications for Thailand, one of the world’s top coconut producers and a nation where coconut oil is embedded in culinary and cultural traditions.

For years, coconut oil has enjoyed a revival among global health-conscious communities and foodies, touted as a miracle ingredient—said to promote weight loss, boost brain function, and improve heart health. From Bangkok’s vegan cafes to the wellness aisles of convenience stores nationwide, coconut oil is marketed as a clean, natural, and nutritious alternative to other fats. Yet, according to recent expert analysis and research covered by Fortune, these glowing endorsements are not aligned with the current scientific consensus on dietary fats and cardiovascular health. Nutrition scientists cited in the article urge consumers not to “fall for the lie” that coconut oil is a healthy superfood, pointing squarely to its extremely high saturated fat content—around 90%—which is one of the highest among cooking oils and rivals that of butter and animal lard (Fortune).

Recent nutrition research continues to champion dietary fiber as a key pillar of healthy living, and new recommendations are highlighting specific foods that can make it easier—and more delicious—to meet daily fiber needs. A report published on Martha Stewart’s website, drawing on advice from registered dietitians, emphasizes that most adults fail to eat sufficient fiber, with far-reaching implications for digestive, metabolic, and heart health (Martha Stewart). For Thailand, where the average daily fiber intake remains well below recommended levels, this message carries particular urgency.

A growing body of research and expert dietary advice is converging on a clear message: increasing the size and substance of meals may be one of the most practical ways for individuals to reduce their consumption of ultra-processed snacks, a major contributor to a range of chronic health problems worldwide. This recommendation, spotlighted in a recent report by Business Insider, is resonating globally and holds considerable relevance for Thai readers, as Thailand grapples with rising rates of obesity, diabetes, and other non-communicable diseases tied to eating habits.

The latest nutrition research highlights a crucial truth for women in their 40s: changing what—and how—they eat is not just about looking younger, but about protecting long-term health as their bodies undergo profound hormonal shifts. With menopause often beginning between ages 45 and 55, experts are urging Thai women to proactively adjust their diets to address new risks such as bone loss, heart disease, and changing nutritional needs—a message that comes as fad diets and “anti-aging” trends often dominate conversations around midlife women’s health.

Recent scientific developments are rewriting the dietary narrative around carbohydrates, raising key questions for health-conscious Thais: are bread, pasta, and rice truly bad for you, or have we misunderstood these staples? Drawing on emerging global and local research, nutrition experts are dispelling myths and clarifying that the context in which we eat carbohydrates matters as much as their quantity or type, according to a detailed report in The Sunday Times Magazine.

A growing body of global research is spotlighting an increasingly simple, yet potentially transformative, dietary strategy: meal sequencing—eating your foods in a specific order, starting with protein and fiber-rich vegetables and ending with carbohydrates. Recent studies reveal that not only what you eat, but the order in which you eat it, can have powerful effects on blood sugar, appetite, and long-term health, especially for Thai people seeking practical ways to prevent diabetes and manage weight.

A fresh wave of research and expert analysis confirms what nutritionists have long maintained—there’s no nutritional difference between brown and white eggs, regardless of price or popular perception. As consumers in Thailand and around the world reach for brown eggs, often convinced they’re making a healthier choice, leading scientists and poultry specialists want to set the record straight: the color of an eggshell tells you more about the hen’s genetics than the egg’s nutrients or health benefits, as highlighted in a recent report from Slate and backed by research from sources such as Healthline and the USDA (Slate, Healthline, USDA).

As low-carb diets remain a popular trend among weight-conscious Thais and people around the world, new research published in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics has sounded a cautionary note: cutting carbohydrates may unexpectedly leave you short on several essential vitamins and minerals, with possible long-term health consequences for those who don’t carefully balance their menus (EatingWell). This fresh evidence urges the health-minded public to look past quick results and consider nutritional completeness, particularly as Thai society increasingly embraces Western and trendy diet patterns in the hopes of fighting the national rise in obesity.