#Foodmyths

A new cane sugar version of Coca-Cola is now on shelves, replacing high-fructose corn syrup with cane sugar. Some wellness voices applaud the change, but experts say the health impact is modest and driven more by branding than a major nutritional upgrade. For Thai readers, the shift raises questions about sugar sources, total intake, and everyday choices.

A strong opening point: both cane sugar and HFCS supply calories but offer little in the way of essential nutrients. In Thailand, the health risk rises with overall sugar consumption, not the sugar type. Public health campaigns continue to urge moderation and reduced added sugar across all foods and drinks.

Coca-Cola’s latest announcement to introduce a new version of its classic soda, sweetened with cane sugar instead of high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), is making waves in the beverage world. While this move is being celebrated by some wellness influencers and health-conscious consumers, research and expert opinions reveal that the change is more of a marketing tactic than a substantive health initiative. The nutritional difference between cane sugar and HFCS, in reality, is minute—raising critical questions about the motives driving such product innovation and what it truly means for consumers, including those in Thailand.

For generations, supermarket shoppers in Thailand and worldwide have puzzled over a simple question: Should we choose brown eggs or white eggs for better health? Recent research and input from leading dietitians make it clear—the difference lies not in nutrition, but in detail. According to a new report and recent expert interviews, the color of an egg’s shell has little to do with its health benefits or taste. Instead, it depends almost entirely on the breed of the hen that laid it—a fact that is often overlooked in popular perception. Understanding the real science behind eggs is crucial for Thai consumers seeking to make healthy and cost-effective choices in their diets, especially as food prices rise and health consciousness deepens across the country.

Eggs remain a staple in Thai kitchens, from pad Thai to everyday breakfasts. Yet many shoppers debate whether brown eggs are healthier or tastier than white ones. Current nutrition guidance clarifies that shell color does not determine health or flavor. Instead, nutrition depends on hen breed, feed, freshness, and farming practices. For budget-conscious Thai families, the focus should be provenance and quality rather than shell hue.

A typical large egg offers about 74-80 calories, roughly 6 grams of high-quality protein, 5 grams of fat, and less than 1 gram of carbohydrates. Eggs provide essential nutrients like vitamin A, biotin, lutein and zeaxanthin, and choline, which is particularly important for fetal brain development. While eggs contain cholesterol, current science shows most people can enjoy them in moderation as long as saturated and trans fats are limited. This is especially relevant for families seeking affordable, nutritious options.

A newly viral claim that eating raisins could help you live longer has captured the public’s imagination, with many headlines suggesting these humble dried grapes might boost your lifespan—though not without caveats and tongue-in-cheek warnings about side effects such as “making your leg drop off.” With such bold claims circulating, Thai readers are left wondering: is there real science behind eating raisins for health and longevity, and what should we take from these sensational reports?

A recent surge of viral headlines claims that eating raisins can extend life. The messages mix encouraging notes with tongue-in-cheek warnings, such as jokes about “making your leg drop off.” For Thai readers, the question is clear: is there real science behind raisins and longevity, or is this another sensational food trend?

Raisins have a long-standing presence in Thai cuisine, enjoyed as snacks and in desserts. The international attention comes at a time when Thailand grapples with rising non-communicable diseases like heart disease and diabetes. Many people are seeking dietary patterns that may support health and prevention, making evidence-based guidance especially relevant.