#Foodpolicy

Chile’s bold efforts to curb childhood junk food consumption have sparked international attention, prompting the question: if Chile can do it, why can’t the UK—or, indeed, Thailand? The South American nation’s sweeping package of regulations, focusing on marketing and labeling, has spurred a dramatic decline in unhealthy snack intake by children. This development has brought fresh hope to public health officials worldwide grappling with rising obesity rates among the youth.

A major new study spanning 101 countries has revealed that adults who consume a diet rich in plant-based proteins tend to live longer, while animal proteins remain crucial during early life. Published in Nature Communications, the international research provides some of the most comprehensive evidence yet linking dietary protein sources to lifespan, with possible lessons for Thailand’s evolving food landscape and health policies Nature Communications.

Across the globe, diets higher in plant protein were associated with significantly improved adult survivorship and overall life expectancy, especially when compared to diets where most protein comes from animal sources. Notably, the opposite effect was found among young children—animal-derived proteins offered unique survival benefits in the first years of life, likely due to bioavailable nutrients critical for development.

A wave of new research underscores a compelling message for public health: cutting out ultra-processed foods may significantly reduce the risk of developing cancer, according to leading medical professionals. Recent coverage in the UK-based GetSurrey highlighted doctors’ warnings that a single change in our diets—drastically reducing consumption of ultra-processed foods—could be one of the most effective ways to lower the likelihood of cancer onset across the population [source].

This news comes at a crucial juncture for Thai readers, as the adoption of Westernized diets heavy in processed foods accelerates in urban communities. Against a backdrop of rising cancer rates both in Thailand and globally, the public health implications of dietary choices have never been more relevant.

For decades, the nutrition spotlight has shone on protein—essential for muscle building and widely marketed as the hero of health. But a wave of new research and expert commentary is propelling dietary fiber into the foreground, suggesting that many people should prioritize fiber as much—or even more—than protein for overall well-being. This shift carries crucial lessons for Thai diets dominated by white rice, noodles, and increasingly processed foods, underscoring a potential public health opportunity with national significance.

A major rift in U.S. health research has surfaced with the early retirement of Dr. Kevin Hall, a renowned scientist from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), who has publicly cited censorship and recent political interference as the driving force behind his departure. Dr. Hall’s resignation has sent shockwaves through the global nutrition science community, reigniting concerns about the politicization of scientific research—a development with far-reaching implications for how countries like Thailand address the growing crises of obesity, Type 2 diabetes, and ultraprocessed food consumption.

France’s top food safety agency, ANSES (Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l’alimentation, de l’environnement et du travail), has sent shockwaves through the international nutrition community with its latest recommendation: soy-based foods should be banned from all public mass catering, including schools, hospitals, and care homes. This call, issued in March 2025, has ignited global debate over the safety of soy products—a topic relevant to Thailand as plant-based menus become increasingly popular in schools and health-conscious households.