#Foodpolicy

A recent wave of scientific research and new regulatory efforts has reignited a heated debate about the sugar content of orange juice—how much is in your morning glass, and what does it mean for Thai health? Amid widespread perceptions that orange juice is a wholesome, vitamin-rich beverage, the reality is far more complex and comes at a crucial moment for consumers and the beverage industry globally.

Orange juice is a staple in breakfast tables worldwide, often praised for its high vitamin C and nutrient content. However, recent attention has focused on its sugar content, which, according to multiple nutrition experts, is similar to that in many soft drinks. For Thai readers, where rising rates of diabetes and metabolic disease are increasingly prevalent, this comparison is especially significant. Research published by public health authorities and leading nutrition organizations, including the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, has found that a standard 240 ml glass (about 1 cup) of 100% orange juice contains around 20–26 grams of sugar—, which have about 26–28 grams per serving. This similarity challenges the public perception that fruit juice is categorically healthier than soda.

A prominent American fitness influencer has called for sweeping reforms in the regulation of food and pharmaceutical products, urging policymakers to broaden their focus beyond artificial food dyes. At a recent summit, this celebrity trainer and media personality expressed her support for the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement, advocating not only for bans on synthetic additives like Red 40 but for a far wider overhaul of what is allowed in the nation’s food supply. Her remarks have renewed debate about the safety of food ingredients, the influence of powerful industry lobbies, and the steps individuals and governments can take to protect public health.

A prominent American fitness influencer has urged policymakers to widen regulation beyond artificial food dyes. Speaking at a recent summit, the trainer aligned with a health-focused movement advocating broad changes to what is permitted in the U.S. food supply. Her remarks rekindle debates over ingredient safety, industry influence, and how governments and individuals can safeguard public health.

The topic resonates in Thailand, where processed foods, snacks, and beverages often rely on artificial colorings. As Thailand’s food sector follows Western trends, questions arise about whether the country should reassess its approach to additives, especially as health awareness rises and diet-related diseases become more common. International research indicates that attention to food ingredient safety is a shared concern across borders, including Southeast Asia.

A newly published article from the MIT Press Reader critically examines the long-held belief that humans must eat meat for optimal health, presenting recent research which dismantles the popular evolutionary argument justifying meat consumption. This in-depth analysis challenges the notion that our ancestors’ supposed dependence on meat has meaningful implications for modern dietary choices, with notable ramifications for public health discussions in Thailand and beyond (MIT Press Reader).

The evolutionary argument for meat eating, often used to advocate for high-protein diets like the “paleo” regimen, claims that humans evolved as obligatory meat eaters and thus must continue this pattern today. This narrative has gained traction in both Western and Thai health circles, influencing restaurant menus, consumer trends, and even government nutrition guidance. But the latest research reveals key flaws in this logic. Modern health records, large-scale dietary studies, and nutritional analyses of plant foods collectively call into question the necessity and safety of high meat intake in the 21st century.

A recent analysis challenges the idea that meat is necessary for optimal health and questions the notion that ancestors depended on meat in a way that dictates modern eating. The piece reframes nutrition and highlights implications for public health in Thailand and beyond.

The traditional narrative that “we evolved to eat meat” has shaped high-protein, paleo-style diets and influenced menus, consumer choices, and even government guidance in Thailand. New research argues that these evolutionary claims rest on speculative reconstructions of prehistoric diets rather than solid evidence. Today’s health data and large population studies show that heavy meat intake is not required to meet nutritional needs.

A major international study reshapes how we understand obesity. The research shows that diet—especially ultra-processed foods—is the dominant factor in rising obesity rates worldwide, challenging the idea that sedentary lifestyles alone drive the trend. The findings highlight food quality and composition as key contributors across diverse populations, including urban Thai communities.

Data were gathered from more than 4,000 adults across 34 countries, using precise metabolic measurements to assess daily energy expenditure. After adjusting for body size, researchers found little difference in total daily calories burned between people in rich, industrialized nations and those leading physically demanding traditional lifestyles. In short, active workers in some settings burn roughly the same number of calories as office workers in wealthier countries when body mass is considered.

A groundbreaking international study has toppled one of the most persistent beliefs about obesity: the idea that sedentary lifestyles in wealthy countries are chiefly to blame for the global epidemic of excess weight. Instead, new research published this week in the prestigious Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) points squarely at what we eat—particularly the prevalence of ultra-processed foods—as the dominant cause of rising obesity rates around the world (Washington Post).

A groundbreaking new study tracking over 540,000 adults for nearly 30 years has ignited alarm across the global health community, revealing a significant link between diets high in ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and an increased risk of early death. Published in July 2025 and widely cited by international health experts, the research found that participants consuming the most ultra-processed foods had about a 10% higher risk of dying early, compared to those with the lowest consumption levels. With ultra-processed foods now a staple in many Thai diets, these findings carry urgent implications for national health and daily food choices.

A large international study followed more than 540,000 adults for nearly three decades and found a link between diets rich in ultra-processed foods and a higher risk of premature death. The research indicates those with the highest intake of ultra-processed foods faced about a 10% greater chance of dying earlier than those who consumed the least. With UPFs common in Thai diets, these findings have immediate relevance for health and daily eating habits.

A new CDC study shows that fast food remains a staple for many Americans, but the overall reliance is slowly easing. The report, conducted through the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2021 to 2023, found that just over 30% of adults eat fast food daily, and about one in five get at least a quarter of their daily calories from these meals. The findings also indicate shifting attitudes among youth toward convenience foods, underscoring evolving dietary choices in the United States.

The United States is poised to unveil updated Dietary Guidelines for Americans as soon as this June, a key development closely tracked by health professionals, schools, and policymakers worldwide, including in Thailand. According to recent reports from Reuters and other reputable outlets, these guidelines—which shape food policy for institutions, inform the design of school lunch programs, and influence professional nutrition advice globally—are expected to be released after an extensive scientific review process. While the final version has yet to be published, leaked details suggest that the new guidance may emphasize increased plant-based food consumption, updated recommendations for protein sources, and stricter limits on processed foods and added sugars. This update is part of a five-year revision cycle aimed at reflecting the latest nutrition science and the shifting health needs of populations (MSN report; Devdiscourse).

A major update to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans is expected to be released soon, potentially as early as June. Health professionals, educators, and policymakers around the world, including in Thailand, are watching closely. The forthcoming guidance will shape food policy for institutions, influence school meal programs, and inform nutrition advice used beyond the United States. Early reports indicate the new edition may push for more plant-based foods, updated protein recommendations, and tighter limits on added sugars and processed foods. The update is part of a five-year cycle to reflect the latest science and the evolving needs of populations.

A 30-year study involving more than 47,000 women has found that eating a diet rich in fiber and high-quality carbohydrates, such as whole grains, fruits, vegetables, and legumes, dramatically increases the chance of healthy aging, according to research published in JAMA Network Open on May 16, 2025 (jamanetwork.com). The findings offer new hope for preventing chronic illnesses and maintaining physical and cognitive function as Thailand—and much of Asia—faces a rapidly aging population.

A landmark 30-year study of more than 47,000 women shows that diets rich in fiber and high-quality carbohydrates—such as whole grains, fruits, vegetables, and legumes—significantly boost the odds of aging healthily. The research, published in JAMA Network Open, highlights a practical path to better physical and cognitive function as populations age, a matter of growing importance for Thailand and much of Asia.

Why this matters for Thai audiences: Thailand is approaching a “super-aged” era, with projections suggesting a substantial share of residents will be 60 or older by 2040. The rise in chronic diseases and frailty poses a growing healthcare and social challenge. The study’s emphasis on diet quality offers a relevant, scalable approach for healthier aging in Thai communities.

A recent US report reveals that ultra-processed foods now account for 60% of American diets, raising urgent questions about the health costs of convenience and what this trend may signal for Thai consumers (WRAL). As Thailand’s urban lifestyles evolve and Western-style diets gain popularity, Thai health experts warn the nation may be following a similar—and troubling—trajectory.

Ultra-processed foods, often packaged for convenience, include items like sweetened breakfast cereals, instant noodles, reconstituted meat products, and sugary drinks. These foods are typically high in refined sugars, unhealthy fats, salt, and artificial additives, while being low in fiber, vitamins, and minerals (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health). The sheer scale observed in the US—where more than half of daily caloric intake comes from such products—has serious implications for public health: studies consistently link diets high in ultra-processed foods to increased rates of obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and even some cancers (BMJ).

A recent US study shows ultra-processed foods now comprise about 60% of daily calories, fueling concerns about the health costs of convenience. Thai health experts caution that a similar pattern could take root here as urban lifestyles and Western-style snacks spread across the country.

Ultra-processed foods are typically packaged for speed and ease. They include sweetened cereals, instant noodles, reconstituted meats, and sugary beverages. These items tend to be high in refined sugars, unhealthy fats, salt, and artificial additives, while offering little fiber, vitamins, or minerals. In the United States, the scale of consumption has sparked discussions about rising obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and even certain cancers, prompting policymakers to reexamine food environments.

Hidden sugars are more widespread than people realize. Although public campaigns exist, many consumers unknowingly ingest “free sugars” through everyday foods. Recent UK policy expanded the sugar tax to pre-packaged milkshakes and coffees with more than 5g of sugar per 100ml, aiming to curb undetected sugars in typical diets. For Thai families, this global development underscores the need to scrutinize what’s in plates and cups at home and on the go.

Despite growing public awareness and repeated government campaigns to reduce added sugar consumption, recent research indicates that people are still consuming far more “free sugars” than they realize—often due to hidden sugars lurking in everyday, seemingly healthy foods. This week, new policy action in the UK has broadened the so-called “sugar tax” to include pre-packaged milkshakes and coffees exceeding 5g of sugar per 100ml, a move aimed directly at curbing the widespread problem of undetected sugars in typical diets (The Times). For Thai families, who are increasingly exposed to Western-style processed foods and beverages, this global development shines a spotlight on the urgent need for local consumers to scrutinize what’s on their plates and in their cups.

A new wave of concern is rising as researchers report a strong link between high intake of ultra-processed foods and shorter lifespans. The study, highlighted in Prevention magazine, adds to growing evidence that heavily processed items—such as instant noodles, packaged snacks, sweetened beverages, and ready-to-eat meals—may shave years off lives. The findings resonate in Thailand, where busy lifestyles and aggressive marketing have boosted access to convenient, processed options.

The global relevance of this research is clear. Ultra-processed foods are increasingly common on supermarket shelves and in street stalls, making public understanding of their health effects essential. For Thailand, rapid urbanization, evolving work patterns, and aggressive marketing have intensified the availability of processed snacks and meals in cities like Bangkok and Chiang Mai, raising questions about long-term health outcomes.

A new wave of scientific concern is sweeping the globe after researchers found a strong association between consuming ultra-processed foods and a shortened lifespan, according to a recent study highlighted in Prevention magazine. The findings, reported earlier this year, reinforce mounting evidence that diets high in heavily processed foods—such as instant noodles, packaged snacks, sweetened beverages, and ready-to-eat meals—could be taking tangible years off people’s lives, raising urgent public health questions for Thailand and beyond.

Chile’s aggressive push to curb childhood junk-food consumption is shaping a global conversation on healthier diets for young people. By tightening marketing rules and front-of-pack labeling, Chile reports a notable drop in unhealthy snack purchases among children. Public health officials worldwide see this as a practical blueprint for addressing youth obesity.

The heart of Chile’s approach is simple and visible: large, black stop-sign warnings on foods high in sugar, salt, and fat; a ban on advertising unhealthy products to children; and restrictions on sales in schools. Since these measures began in 2016, families, teachers, and retailers have faced a clearer, more public health-oriented food environment. The World Health Organization has highlighted the urgency of reducing childhood overweight and obesity, noting a global rise that demands stronger action. In Thailand, about one in ten schoolchildren is overweight or obese, a trend mirrored by expanding fast-food availability and aggressive snack marketing.

Chile’s bold efforts to curb childhood junk food consumption have sparked international attention, prompting the question: if Chile can do it, why can’t the UK—or, indeed, Thailand? The South American nation’s sweeping package of regulations, focusing on marketing and labeling, has spurred a dramatic decline in unhealthy snack intake by children. This development has brought fresh hope to public health officials worldwide grappling with rising obesity rates among the youth.

A landmark study spanning 101 countries finds that adults who eat more plant-based proteins tend to live longer, while animal proteins play a critical role in early life. Published in Nature Communications, the research is among the most comprehensive to date on how protein sources relate to lifespan. The findings offer lessons for Thailand’s evolving food landscape and health policy.

Across the world, higher plant protein intake is associated with improved adult survivorship and greater life expectancy, especially when compared with diets dominated by animal proteins. Conversely, the study shows that animal-protein may provide vital survival benefits during the first years of life, likely due to nutrients essential for growth and immune development.

A major new study spanning 101 countries has revealed that adults who consume a diet rich in plant-based proteins tend to live longer, while animal proteins remain crucial during early life. Published in Nature Communications, the international research provides some of the most comprehensive evidence yet linking dietary protein sources to lifespan, with possible lessons for Thailand’s evolving food landscape and health policies Nature Communications.

Across the globe, diets higher in plant protein were associated with significantly improved adult survivorship and overall life expectancy, especially when compared to diets where most protein comes from animal sources. Notably, the opposite effect was found among young children—animal-derived proteins offered unique survival benefits in the first years of life, likely due to bioavailable nutrients critical for development.