#Foodpolicy

A wave of new research underscores a compelling message for public health: cutting out ultra-processed foods may significantly reduce the risk of developing cancer, according to leading medical professionals. Recent coverage in the UK-based GetSurrey highlighted doctors’ warnings that a single change in our diets—drastically reducing consumption of ultra-processed foods—could be one of the most effective ways to lower the likelihood of cancer onset across the population [source].

This news comes at a crucial juncture for Thai readers, as the adoption of Westernized diets heavy in processed foods accelerates in urban communities. Against a backdrop of rising cancer rates both in Thailand and globally, the public health implications of dietary choices have never been more relevant.

A growing body of research reinforces a clear public health message: cutting ultra-processed foods can significantly lower cancer risk. Leading clinicians say a substantial reduction in these foods could be one of the most effective population-wide strategies. The headlines in international health coverage underline this bold claim, and its relevance is rising in Thailand as urban diets shift toward convenience foods.

For Thai readers, the timing is critical. Urbanization and Western-style eating patterns are spreading, coinciding with rising cancer incidence in Thailand and worldwide. Dietary choices now carry more public health weight than ever.

For decades, the nutrition spotlight has shone on protein—essential for muscle building and widely marketed as the hero of health. But a wave of new research and expert commentary is propelling dietary fiber into the foreground, suggesting that many people should prioritize fiber as much—or even more—than protein for overall well-being. This shift carries crucial lessons for Thai diets dominated by white rice, noodles, and increasingly processed foods, underscoring a potential public health opportunity with national significance.

Fiber is moving from the periphery to the forefront of nutrition debates. While protein has long dominated health messaging, experts now argue that fiber should be a priority for overall well-being. This shift is especially meaningful for Thai diets, which are centered on white rice and noodles and increasingly influenced by processed foods. Increasing fiber intake could be a powerful public health opportunity for Thailand.

Global data highlight the fiber gap. The 2020–2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans report that up to 90% of women and 97% of men do not meet recommended fiber intake. General targets are 25 grams per day for women and 38 grams for men, though many fall short. Thailand faces a similar challenge: urban diets often rely on refined grains and lack fruits and vegetables. A registered dietitian notes that fiber deserves more attention because it supports gut health, digestion, blood sugar regulation, cholesterol levels, and longevity.

A major rift in U.S. health research has surfaced with the early retirement of Dr. Kevin Hall, a renowned scientist from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), who has publicly cited censorship and recent political interference as the driving force behind his departure. Dr. Hall’s resignation has sent shockwaves through the global nutrition science community, reigniting concerns about the politicization of scientific research—a development with far-reaching implications for how countries like Thailand address the growing crises of obesity, Type 2 diabetes, and ultraprocessed food consumption.

A major rift in health science has emerged as Dr. Kevin Hall of the U.S. National Institutes of Health announces early retirement, citing censorship and political interference as the driving forces behind his decision. The move has shocked the global nutrition community and rekindled concerns about politicization in science, a development with wide implications for how Thailand confronts obesity, Type 2 diabetes, and ultraprocessed foods.

Dr. Hall is renowned for pioneering work on ultraprocessed foods—packaged snacks, instant noodles, and factory-made baked goods—that dominate modern diets in the United States and Thailand. His landmark trials demonstrated that ultraprocessed foods tend to increase calorie intake and promote weight gain compared with minimally processed meals, raising risks for obesity and diabetes. As a leading NIH figure, his departure raises questions about the resilience of independent, data-driven science in ongoing nutrition policy debates worldwide. The implications are being felt across research communities and health agencies in Thailand and beyond.

France’s top food safety agency, ANSES (Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l’alimentation, de l’environnement et du travail), has sent shockwaves through the international nutrition community with its latest recommendation: soy-based foods should be banned from all public mass catering, including schools, hospitals, and care homes. This call, issued in March 2025, has ignited global debate over the safety of soy products—a topic relevant to Thailand as plant-based menus become increasingly popular in schools and health-conscious households.

A French health agency has sparked a global conversation about soy in public catering, including schools, hospitals, and care homes. In March 2025, ANSES emphasized caution around high-intensity soy consumption, focusing on isoflavones, the plant compounds that can act like estrogen in the body. The agency warned that excessive intake could influence hormone balance and potentially affect children’s development if exposure is prolonged. Thai readers should note the emphasis on balanced nutrition and moderation as schools increasingly explore plant-based proteins.