#GetMeOffYourList

In a disconcerting revelation, predatory journals appear to be proliferating, despite a notorious experiment intended to expose their unethical practices. The now infamous paper, titled “Get Me Off Your Fckng Mailing List,” was originally submitted as a hoax to highlight the shortcomings of certain academic publications, yet its acceptance underscored a troubling trend that persists today.

To provide some context, the paper repeatedly features the phrase “Get me off your f*cking mailing list” over the span of ten pages. Its straightforward, albeit explicit, statement was accepted for publication back in 2014 by the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology. The continued operations of such journals have been a growing concern among academics, as they exploit researchers by charging fees for publication without providing rigorous peer review processes.

A troubling trend persists in academic publishing: predatory journals continue to operate despite a notorious hoax paper that exposed their flaws. The paper, titled “Get Me Off Your Fcking Mailing List,” was originally submitted as a guide to highlight weak peer review. Its eventual acceptance in 2014 by the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology underscored a broader problem in scholarly publishing.

The hoax paper centers on a blunt, repeated line across ten pages. While the text is explicit, the central issue it reveals is the lack of rigorous editorial standards in some journals that charge fees for publication without meaningful peer review. This reality remains a concern for researchers who are new to the field or work with limited funding, especially when confronted with aggressive outreach.