#HumanEvolution

A dramatic new find from Spain suggests a Neanderthal may have intentionally created art using a single ochre-stained touch. The discovery challenges long-standing ideas about when and by whom symbolic thinking and artistic expression began. The study appears in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences and strengthens the view that Neanderthals shared complex cognitive abilities with modern humans.

An eight-inch pebble of quartz-rich granite, excavated in 2022 from a central Spanish rock shelter, lies at the center of the claim. Researchers estimate the pebble is about 42,000 to 43,000 years old. It bears curved forms that resemble a face, and crucially, a vivid red dot placed precisely where the “nose” would be. Forensic analysis by Spanish authorities identified the mark as an ochre fingerprint deliberately applied by a Neanderthal finger, not a random scratch.

New research from Spain has revealed a striking find: a Neanderthal may have intentionally created a piece of art with just a single, ochre-marked touch, rewriting long-held assumptions about human and Neanderthal creativity. The discovery, outlined in a new study published in the journal Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, elevates the prehistoric record and deepens our understanding of the Neanderthal mind AOL News.

At the center of this revelation is an 8-inch-long quartz-rich granite pebble, excavated in 2022 from a rock shelter in central Spain. Thought to be between 42,000 and 43,000 years old, the pebble itself features curves and indentations that, to modern eyes, give it the uncanny appearance of a human face. But what captivated archaeologists most was a single, vivid red dot placed exactly where the “nose” would be. Forensics carried out by Spanish police confirmed what was invisible to the naked eye: the mark was a fingerprint made with ochre—an earth pigment commonly used in prehistoric times—applied purposefully by a Neanderthal finger AOL News.

A new scholarly perspective from a Harvard professor challenges a deeply ingrained health narrative: humans may be evolutionarily suited to rest as much as move. The discussion invites readers to rethink how we live, work, and exercise in modern society, moving away from the blanket idea that prolonged sitting is simply a modern evil.

Sedentary behavior has dominated global health debates for years, with studies linking long hours of sitting to heart disease, diabetes, and higher mortality risk. In Thailand, rising urbanization and screen-based work have spurred nationwide campaigns encouraging frequent movement. The new evolutionary viewpoint adds nuance, suggesting that our ancestors may have balanced activity and rest in ways that differ from today’s office-driven lifestyle.

In a compelling new development that challenges popular notions of physical health, a Harvard University professor’s book asserts that humans may actually be evolutionarily built for sitting, rather than for long-distance running or relentless physical activity. This argument, summarized in a recent summary report, invites readers to reconsider ingrained beliefs—particularly the now-infamous comparison that “sitting is the new smoking”—and urges a reassessment of how we live, work, and exercise in modern society source.

A new study shows that human brains have distinctive internal wiring, especially in the temporal lobe, offering a fresh view on what makes people unique. Instead of focusing only on brain size, researchers map how regions connect and communicate to shape higher thinking and social behavior.

Historically, brain differences were assessed by comparing overall size across species. Size alone cannot explain cognitive differences. Modern imaging allows scientists to chart brain connectivity with greater clarity, revealing subtle patterns that distinguish humans from close relatives.