#Ideology

New scientific findings show our brains shape how we form beliefs, handle evidence, and stay flexible. A recent book by figurehead in political neuroscience, Dr. Leor Zmigrod, explores how biology underpins not just what we think, but how open we are to changing our minds. For Thai readers, these insights connect to everyday debates—from elections to cultural norms—and offer practical ways to foster constructive dialogue.

In Thailand, ideological clashes surface in politics, religion, and social norms. The country’s mix of Buddhist philosophy, hierarchical culture, and rapid social change makes open thinking especially relevant. Research suggests that some brains are more tuned for flexible thinking, while others gravitate toward rigid worldviews. This matters as Thai society navigates polarization, reform, and modernization.

A wave of research is reshaping the way we understand ideology—not just as a social or political phenomenon, but as a deeply rooted function of the human brain. A recent book by political neuroscientist Dr. Leor Zmigrod, “The Ideological Brain: The Radical Science of Flexible Thinking,” has captured global attention by revealing how our biological wiring underpins not only our convictions but also our openness—or resistance—to evidence and change (Nautilus, NY Times). Why does ideology “taste” so good to the mind, and what makes some of us more likely to become deeply entrenched, even to the point of dogma? The answers emerging from neuroscience offer insight for Thais grappling with political polarization and social change.

A growing body of research reveals that political rigidity—across the spectrum from far-right to far-left—reflects deep neural patterns as much as personal beliefs. Neuroscientist Leor Zmigrod explores this in her book, The Ideological Brain: The Radical Science of Flexible Thinking, highlighting how strongly held views influence and are influenced by brain processes. The discussion is highly relevant to Thai audiences as debates around policy, identity, and social cohesion continue to evolve.

Political rigidity across the spectrum, from far-right Christian nationalists to far-left Marxist-Leninists, can momentarily disrupt the socio-political landscape. Landmark insights into this phenomenon have been presented by neuroscientist Leor Zmigrod, who details new dimensions of what she terms the “ideological brain” in her recent book “The Ideological Brain: The Radical Science of Flexible Thinking.” Zmigrod’s work shines a light on how strongly-held beliefs shape—and are shaped by—neurological processes, echoing themes that are as relevant in Thailand as they are globally.