#Jobs

Recent graduates in computer science face an unprecedented employment crisis as artificial intelligence tools and widespread technology layoffs fundamentally reshape entry-level hiring practices across the industry. Comprehensive research by The New York Times, supported by Federal Reserve Bank of New York labor data and Computing Research Association enrollment statistics, reveals that unemployment among recent computing graduates has reached concerning levels while undergraduate degree production has surged. This collision between expanded supply and contracted demand, accelerated by generative AI coding assistants and mass technology sector layoffs, disrupts traditional pathways from computer science education to software engineering careers.

Recent research and reporting show a sudden and painful reversal for many young computer science graduates who entered university during the tech boom only to find an A.I.‑reshaped labour market that no longer guarantees a fast track to high‑paying engineering jobs. A New York Times investigation, supported by new labour data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and enrollment figures from the Computing Research Association, documents that unemployment among recent computing graduates has risen, that undergraduate production has surged even as entry‑level hiring contracts, and that generative A.I. coding tools together with widespread tech layoffs are disrupting the traditional path from degree to software job (New York Times; New York Fed; CRA Taulbee Survey). The change matters for Thai students, universities and policymakers as Thailand pushes an ambitious national A.I. plan while preparing the next generation of digital workers.

A viral internet compilation documenting seven instances where older adults offered advice that seems hopelessly out of touch with contemporary realities has sparked global conversations about widening generational divides that extend far beyond cultural differences to encompass fundamental economic, technological, and social transformations affecting how young people navigate housing, employment, education, and mental health. The widely-shared listicle, which began as entertainment, exposes deeper structural shifts that render traditional life strategies—“just buy a house,” “college guarantees success,” “tough it out”—not merely outdated but potentially harmful for younger generations facing unprecedented challenges in accessing homeownership, stable employment, and economic security. For Thai readers, this generational friction reflects familiar tensions visible across Bangkok high-rises, Chiang Mai universities, and family gatherings throughout the kingdom, where traditional expectations collide with contemporary realities of inflated housing costs, precarious gig economy employment, and evolving mental health awareness. Most significantly, comprehensive data from housing markets, labor statistics, and educational institutions demonstrates that younger people’s apparent “entitlement” or “lack of resilience” often represents rational responses to genuinely changed economic conditions that require updated strategies rather than moral lectures about character and persistence.

A viral roundup titled “7 times boomers proved they’re completely out of touch with reality” has reignited a global conversation about a widening generational divide — not just about attitudes, but about economics, mental health, work and the basic rules of adulthood VegOut. What began as a punchy listicle that lampooned tired advice — “just buy a house,” “college fixes everything,” “toughen up” — quickly exposes deeper structural shifts that make many older-era playbooks impractical or even harmful for younger generations. For Thai readers, the piece is more than internet schadenfreude: it holds up a mirror to similar tensions in Bangkok apartments, Chiang Mai co‑working spaces and family dinner tables across the country, and prompts a look at evidence from housing data, labour reports and mental‑health research that explain why younger people are frustrated, anxious and changing their life plans.

The computer science major, long regarded as a direct path to a lucrative tech career, needs a deep rebranding to reflect its true essence and purpose, according to the head of Android at Google. As artificial intelligence (AI) rapidly transforms software engineering, this call to rethink computer science studies resonates widely—including in Thailand, where STEM education has seen booming enrollment but faces uncertainty amid fast-changing job markets.

In a recent interview reported by Business Insider (businessinsider.com), Google’s Android chief, whose academic background is rooted in UC San Diego’s computer science program, argued that the discipline is often misunderstood as nothing more than training in coding—particularly Java programming. “It is thought of as, ‘go learn how to do Java coding,’” observed the Android leader, adding, “if that’s what you want to do, you don’t need a degree.” Instead, he described computer science as “the science…of solving problems.”

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) is shaking the foundations of Wall Street, with leading experts predicting sweeping job losses across the sector. Recent reports suggest that AI could eliminate entire teams, particularly those filled with junior bankers, analysts, and sales staff, while fundamentally transforming the roles that remain (MarketWatch, eWeek, Fortune, CNBC). As the financial industry accelerates its adoption of AI-driven tools, workers and institutions in Thailand and around the world are facing a moment of reckoning: adapt to the AI revolution or risk being left behind.

The rapid rise of artificial intelligence is upending traditional career pathways for computer science graduates, with many recent degree holders finding themselves left out of a job market they were once promised would be future-proof. Data from major tech hubs and expert analysis indicate that AI’s swift adoption — especially in coding and routine white-collar roles — is fundamentally transforming the opportunities for new entrants in the technology sector, leading to historic increases in unemployment among educated youth. For Thai students and families investing heavily in STEM education, these developments offer both caution and critical lessons for adapting to the future of work.

A rapidly advancing world of artificial intelligence (AI) has left many wondering: will machines make human jobs obsolete? A new analysis published in The Conversation, led by experts in technology and public policy, argues the answer isn’t a simple yes or no. Instead, the future of AI-driven job disruption depends on four key advantages the technology has over humans: speed, scale, scope, and sophistication—a framework that could guide businesses, workers, and societies in understanding where AI is most likely to replace or reshape human work (The Conversation).

A groundbreaking new study has found that taking just a single computer science course during high school can boost Gen Z graduates’ future earnings by as much as 8%, no matter which career path they ultimately pursue. The research, recently reported by Fortune, underscores the economic and social value of digital literacy at a time when technological skills are increasingly in demand across all sectors.

For Thailand, where policymakers and educators are urgently looking for ways to prepare young people for a rapidly changing job market, these findings provide compelling evidence for reforming curricula to include computer science as a core subject. The economic significance is especially notable as young Thais come of age in an era of intense global competition and rising automation, and as the country pivots toward a digital economy under strategies such as Thailand 4.0 (fortune.com).

As artificial intelligence (AI) technologies surge ahead at a blistering pace, it is no longer just software engineers and tech sector insiders who need to worry about their jobs being disrupted—according to leading experts, everyone whose work involves words, data, or ideas must begin preparing to adapt. The urgency of this message comes through powerfully in a recent opinion column in The Washington Post, which warns that the period of “grace” may be much shorter than many professionals realize (Washington Post, 2025).