#Languagematters

A recent open letter addressed to University of Ghana professor Ransford Gyampo has sparked discussions on the importance of language in the context of mental health. The letter, written by Nana Yaw Osei, Ph.D., criticizes the use of the term “mad” to describe individuals with serious mental illnesses (SMI). This critique highlights a broader need to address how mental health is perceived and discussed both publicly and in academia.

In the letter, Dr. Osei argues that terms like “mad” are not only derogatory but also epistemologically naïve and professionally offensive. The commentary reflects a growing awareness that language shapes public perception and stigma around mental health. In this context, it’s important to use terminology that respects the dignity of individuals living with mental health conditions. The United States Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) defines SMI as a diagnosable mental, behavioral, or emotional disorder that significantly interferes with an individual’s life.

A recent open letter to University of Ghana professor Ransford Gyampo has sparked global debates about how language shapes perceptions of mental health. Written by Nana Yaw Osei, Ph.D., the letter criticizes the use of the term “mad” to describe people with serious mental illnesses. This critique underscores a broader push to talk about mental health with dignity and accuracy in both public life and academic settings.

Dr. Osei argues that words like “mad” are not only insulting but also intellectually naïve and professionally inappropriate. The discussion reflects a growing consensus that language influences public attitudes and stigma toward mental health. In Thailand, as in many countries, careful terminology is essential to preserve the dignity of individuals living with mental health conditions.