#Law

Thailand’s trademark landscape is shifting. New board decisions reveal that determining whether two marks are “too similar” goes beyond a quick side‑by‑side comparison; the dominant word in a mark and the transliteration filed with the application can tip the balance between approval and rejection. For Thai businesses planning to register brands at home or expand into fast-growing markets, these nuances are now as important as the logo itself. The changes underscore a broader move in Thai practice toward a holistic assessment of similarity, aligning filing strategies with how consumers actually perceive brands in everyday life.

Revolutionary research from MIT reveals that conversational artificial intelligence can do far more than provide incorrect information—it can actively implant false memories into human minds, increase confidence in those fabricated recollections, and maintain these distortions for weeks after brief interactions. A controlled study of 200 participants found that people who interacted with generative chatbots were misled about critical details at rates reaching 36 percent—roughly three times higher than participants receiving no intervention—while reporting increased confidence in their false memories compared to those using pre-scripted systems or simple surveys.

A new study from researchers at the MIT Media Lab finds that conversational artificial intelligence can do more than make factual errors: generative chatbots powered by large language models can actively implant false memories in human users, increase confidence in those false recollections and leave them intact for at least a week after a brief (10–20 minute) interaction (MIT Media Lab study). In controlled experiments simulating witness interviews, participants who interacted with a generative chatbot were misled on critical details at a rate of 36.4% — roughly three times the rate for people who had no post-event intervention — and reported higher confidence in those false memories compared with people who answered a plain survey or spoke to a pre-scripted chatbot (MIT Media Lab study). The finding raises urgent questions for Thai institutions that already rely on digital tools, from law enforcement to schools and hospitals, about how to guard people’s memories and decisions against AI-driven misinformation.

A new MIT study shows that conversational AI can do more than spread misinformation. It can actively implant false memories, boost confidence in those memories, and maintain distortions for weeks after brief interactions. In a controlled experiment with 200 participants, those who spoke with generative chatbots formed false memories about critical details at a rate of 36 percent—about three times higher than those who received no AI interaction. Participants also reported higher confidence in these false memories compared with those who used pre-scripted systems or simple surveys.

A global debate on child discipline has intensified scrutiny of spanking. In Thailand, lawmakers moved earlier to ban all forms of corporal punishment in homes, schools, and other settings. As Thai families embrace positive parenting, what does science say about physical punishment and child development?

The international discussion highlights a tension between traditional discipline and modern understandings of child growth. Critics point to potential short-term deterrence, while supporters cite religious and cultural justifications. Thailand, however, has enacted a landmark reform to align with international child rights standards, prohibiting both physical and psychological harm as a form of discipline. Amendments to the Civil and Commercial Code reflect a broad commitment to protecting children from violence, consistent with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, ratified by Thailand in 1992. The reform followed more than a decade of advocacy by Thai child-rights groups, mental health professionals, and civil society organizations.

A recent Fox News segment reignited international debate over child discipline after a high-profile television host advocated for parents to “spank your kids’ a—,” scoffing at the rising trend of “gentle parenting.” While such remarks have stirred controversy in the United States, Thailand has, in a landmark legislative reform, moved decisively in the opposite direction—banning all forms of corporal punishment against children in every setting, from the home to the classroom. What does the latest research say about physical punishment, and what lessons can Thai families draw as society transitions to positive parenting in law and life?

A new analysis by a leading research library examines how law, culture, and personal identity intersect in Thailand’s naming system. The study shows how surnames, given names, and nicknames shape daily life, legal processes, and international interactions for Thais navigating registration, transliteration, and name changes.

Historically, Thai naming practices reflect social, religious, and bureaucratic structures. Surnames became widespread after the Surname Act of 1913 as part of state modernization. Since then, every family is expected to register a unique surname, creating a government-regulated identifier that touches government databases, education, and everyday introductions.

A surge in after-school care planning and rising childcare costs is prompting families to rethink when children are ready to be left at home. A recent analysis based on Florida guidelines has sparked international discussion and offers lessons for Thai households navigating after-school routines, holiday supervision, and affordable care options.

In the United States, there is no nationwide minimum age for staying home alone. State guidance and child-safety organizations generally advise against leaving younger children unsupervised. In Florida, authorities suggest that children under 12 should not be left alone, while those aged 12 and older may manage short periods if they show maturity and preparedness. This reflects a broader belief that age alone does not guarantee safety.

Thailand is poised to tighten its cannabis regulations with a plan that could require both Thai citizens and visitors to hold a doctor’s certificate to buy cannabis. The proposal, shared at a Bangkok press briefing by the Public Health Minister, signals a significant shift from Thailand’s 2022 decriminalisation. The move comes just three years after the landmark decision that put the country at the forefront of Asia’s cannabis reforms.

Data from government health authorities shows the cannabis market expanded rapidly after decriminalisation, with shops opening across major cities and tourist hubs. While the policy initially spurred agricultural growth and tourism, gaps in regulations sparked concerns about addiction, underage use, and Thailand’s international image as a “weed tourism” destination. Officials emphasise that the new rule aims to curb recreational use and ensure medical access remains the priority.