#Linguistics

In a digital age dominated by artificial intelligence, the way we speak and write is subtly, but steadily, shifting—thanks in large part to tools like ChatGPT. According to a new study by the Max Planck Institute for Human Development, English speakers have begun to incorporate certain AI-style phrasings, termed “GPT words,” into everyday communication at a remarkable pace over the past 18 months. The findings suggest that the boundary between human expression and machine-generated language is becoming less distinct, raising important questions for language, culture, and education in Thailand and around the world (Gizmodo).

Artificial intelligence is quietly changing the way Thais communicate online and in classrooms. A study by the Max Planck Institute for Human Development shows that English speakers are increasingly using AI-inspired phrases—“GPT words”—in daily speech and writing. The shift over the past 18 months blurs the line between human and machine language and raises questions for language, culture, and education in Thailand.

For Thai audiences, the trend matters because English remains a key tool for business, higher education, and international tourism. As Thai students and professionals interact with AI-driven platforms for study and work, understanding these linguistic shifts helps harness ai effectively while preserving Thai communicative values.

American English and British English share roots, yet their paths diverged in striking ways. For Thai readers who often study English as a global language, understanding this split helps with practical communication and the broader story of language evolution.

The story begins with settlers in the 17th and 18th centuries who carried English to what would become the United States. As communities grew, the language interacted with Indigenous languages, African languages, and later waves of immigrants from around the world. But it was not only natural growth shaping American English. A conscious effort by American intellectuals sought to build a linguistic identity separate from Britain’s. Noah Webster, a prominent lexicographer and education reformer, became the era’s most influential advocate, shaping American English through dictionaries and spelling books that gradually supplanted older British usage in American classrooms by the mid-19th century.

Although American English and British English share the same linguistic roots, differences between them are striking to speakers on both sides of the Atlantic. But why did American English become so distinct from its British counterpart? And what drove the intentional development—sometimes called “invention”—of American English as its own system? For Thai readers accustomed to studying “English” as a single international language, understanding this historical divergence sheds light on both practical communication and the dynamics of language evolution.

A recent linguistics study has shed new light on a question that intrigues people the world over: What makes certain names particularly pleasant to hear? According to newly published research summarized in Psychology Today, scientists have taken a closer look at the sounds of names in different languages and cultures, and have uncovered patterns that explain why some names resonate so positively with our ears. This discovery holds intriguing implications for parents choosing names for their newborns, creative professionals inventing characters in fiction, and anyone interested in the science of sound symbolism.

A recent international study explores a curious question: why do certain names sound more pleasant to the ear? Researchers analyzed names across languages and found patterns in how consonants, vowels, and rhythm influence perceived attractiveness. The findings offer practical insights for parents choosing names, writers creating characters, and anyone curious about the science of sound symbolism.

Why this matters in Thailand: Thai names blend meaning, auspiciousness, and musicality. Parents, monks, and astrologers often work to harmonize phonetics with symbolism when naming a child. The study’s emphasis on how names “flow” musically resonates with Thai traditions, where the sound of a name can be as important as its meaning.

A new wave of scholarship is overturning the simplistic view of English as a “killer language” steamrolling over the world’s linguistic diversity. Recent findings, as highlighted in Laura Spinney’s latest article for Big Think, reveal that while English remains undeniably dominant, its expansion and alleged impact on other languages are far more complex than previously thought. Instead of a binary narrative of destruction and supremacy, researchers now see English as both converging and diverging — simultaneously fueling the birth of new varieties, while occupying a unique and dynamic role in multilingual societies worldwide. These insights are critical for Thai readers, educators, and policymakers grappling with the place of English in a rapidly globalizing region.

A fresh wave of scholarship challenges the idea that English relentlessly erodes linguistic diversity. While English remains dominant, researchers say its influence is more nuanced than a simple battle of loss and supremacy. For Thai readers, educators, and policymakers, this evolving understanding offers a more balanced view of how English fits into multilingual societies and what it means for Thailand’s education and culture.

English rose to its global prominence in the globalization era, becoming a common lingua franca. Critics once labeled it a “killer language” that would drive smaller tongues to extinction. But leading linguists argue the term misleads. English has expanded as a practical tool for international communication, while many indigenous languages continue to thrive in daily life outside Europe. In other words, bilingualism and multilingualism persist, and the “killer language” label reflects a Eurocentric perspective rather than global linguistic realities.