#MediaLiteracy

A viral internet compilation documenting seven instances where older adults offered advice that seems hopelessly out of touch with contemporary realities has sparked global conversations about widening generational divides that extend far beyond cultural differences to encompass fundamental economic, technological, and social transformations affecting how young people navigate housing, employment, education, and mental health. The widely-shared listicle, which began as entertainment, exposes deeper structural shifts that render traditional life strategies—“just buy a house,” “college guarantees success,” “tough it out”—not merely outdated but potentially harmful for younger generations facing unprecedented challenges in accessing homeownership, stable employment, and economic security. For Thai readers, this generational friction reflects familiar tensions visible across Bangkok high-rises, Chiang Mai universities, and family gatherings throughout the kingdom, where traditional expectations collide with contemporary realities of inflated housing costs, precarious gig economy employment, and evolving mental health awareness. Most significantly, comprehensive data from housing markets, labor statistics, and educational institutions demonstrates that younger people’s apparent “entitlement” or “lack of resilience” often represents rational responses to genuinely changed economic conditions that require updated strategies rather than moral lectures about character and persistence.

A viral roundup titled “7 times boomers proved they’re completely out of touch with reality” has reignited a global conversation about a widening generational divide — not just about attitudes, but about economics, mental health, work and the basic rules of adulthood VegOut. What began as a punchy listicle that lampooned tired advice — “just buy a house,” “college fixes everything,” “toughen up” — quickly exposes deeper structural shifts that make many older-era playbooks impractical or even harmful for younger generations. For Thai readers, the piece is more than internet schadenfreude: it holds up a mirror to similar tensions in Bangkok apartments, Chiang Mai co‑working spaces and family dinner tables across the country, and prompts a look at evidence from housing data, labour reports and mental‑health research that explain why younger people are frustrated, anxious and changing their life plans.

Silent digital armies now patrol the internet, wielding artificial intelligence weapons that can precisely target individual minds with surgical precision, according to groundbreaking security research from Vanderbilt University. These sophisticated influence operations, spearheaded by Chinese technology firm GoLaxy, represent a quantum leap beyond the crude social media bots that disrupted global elections in previous years. Unlike their primitive predecessors, these AI-powered propaganda systems don’t simply flood platforms with obvious misinformation—they study human psychology, learn cultural nuances, and craft personalized persuasion campaigns that feel authentically local while serving foreign interests.

A new wave of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered propaganda campaigns has arrived, leveraging advanced generative technologies to subtly manipulate public opinion on a massive scale, according to a recent exposé by security researchers at Vanderbilt University The New York Times. Their report highlights operations led by Chinese tech firm GoLaxy, whose AI-driven influence tactics mark a stark escalation from the simplistic, bot-based interference attempts seen during previous American elections.

Unlike the low-quality, mass-messaging bots that sowed discord around the U.S. elections in 2016 and 2020, today’s AI-enabled campaigns are surgically precise, relentless, and nearly undetectable in their ability to shape digital conversations. This newest chapter in “grey-zone” information warfare raises urgent questions for democracies worldwide—including Thailand—about how to protect their public spheres and national debates from invisible manipulation orchestrated from abroad.

A new in-depth look at the integration of computer technology in education reveals both transformative benefits and complex challenges, offering a fresh perspective for Thai educators and policymakers seeking a balanced approach to digital learning (Lafayette College). The findings, based on a comprehensive classroom study at Lafayette College, showcase how computer science education is being reimagined to foster critical thinking, ethical awareness, and cross-disciplinary dialogue—signaling vital cues for Thailand as it accelerates its national “Thailand 4.0” agenda.

As parents in Thailand and around the world grapple with how much “screen time” is too much for their children, new research and expert opinions are challenging our traditional understanding of what counts as screen time, especially in the era of podcasts, audiobooks, and smart speakers. With children now exposed to a wide range of digital media from an early age—not just tablets and televisions, but also audio-only content—educators, health professionals, and parents are wrestling with an urgent question: Is listening to a podcast the same as watching YouTube, and should it count towards children’s daily screen time limits?

Groundbreaking research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) has uncovered compelling evidence that ordinary people unconsciously contribute to the growth of their own information bubbles, simply through the way they type search queries online. This large-scale study, encompassing 21 experiments and nearly 10,000 participants, demonstrates that even without any intent to seek confirmation, our habitual online search patterns—and the algorithms designed to respond to them—subtly guide us towards ever-narrower realities. These findings have huge implications for how Thais access information, understand national debates, and engage with global topics in a time when digital literacy is crucial for an informed society (PsyPost).

The rapid rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly undermining the foundations of democracy worldwide, according to new research and official warnings. Tools that generate realistic fake images, videos, and audio are being weaponized to deceive voters, influence election outcomes, and foster distrust in democratic processes—often with little oversight or effective countermeasures from authorities or technology firms. This wave of AI-driven disinformation has already played a pivotal role in elections from Europe to Asia, prompting urgent debates on safeguarding electoral integrity and political discourse.

As superheroes shed their perfect, patriotic images and embrace more complex, troubling realities, the lessons they offer young people are shifting—raising new questions for parents, educators, and Thai society about what role pop culture plays in shaping the next generation. The latest research and commentary, highlighted in a recent article from Scientific American, detail how today’s children resonate less with flawless heroes like Superman and more with antiheroes struggling with their own traumas, reflecting a broader transformation not only in Hollywood but within youth culture worldwide (Scientific American).

A recent study has unveiled that the single-letter text response “K” provokes the strongest negative emotions among digital communicators, surpassing even being left on read or receiving responses like “sure” or “fine.” The findings, published in the Journal of Mobile Communication and featured in Times of India’s trending section (timesofindia.indiatimes.com), shed light on how succinct online messages can pack an unexpected emotional punch.

In an era when instant messaging shapes personal, professional, and even cross-cultural relationships—including those in Thailand’s digitally savvy society—the implications of a blunt “K” go far beyond simple acknowledgement. The study sampled 1,500 participants aged 18–45. Researchers tracked emotional responses through surveys, sentiment analysis, and even biometric signals such as heart rate. Results consistently showed that the response “K” was perceived as the coldest and most dismissive of digital replies, frequently interpreted as passive-aggressive or abrupt. Interestingly, both men and women rated “K” as emotionally disconnecting, though women were slightly more sensitive to its effects.

For many Thai parents, the idea of watching a steamy scene in a film alongside their teenage child seems awkward, if not unthinkable. A recent article in The Times has sparked debate by challenging this discomfort, presenting accounts of parents intentionally exposing adolescents to stories with sexual themes as a springboard for open conversations. But what does the latest international research say about sharing sexual content as a family – and what are the implications for Thai families seeking to guide youth through modern media?

A fresh wave of psychological research is shedding light on a question deeply relevant to modern Thai society: why do so many of us gravitate toward easy answers, even when life’s problems demand complex solutions? While the urge for simplicity is universal, the issue is amplified in an era dominated by social media, misinformation, and rapid-fire online debates—raising concerns for educators, health professionals, and cultural leaders across Thailand.

This news matters because Thais, like people worldwide, are increasingly confronted by overwhelming streams of information. From the pandemic to economic uncertainty, and from debates over education reform to navigating digital health advice, the temptation to latch onto clear, concise explanations—regardless of their accuracy—can have profound consequences. For instance, believing in medical quick fixes or simplistic educational remedies may foster decisiveness but also perpetuate misunderstanding and resistance to evidence-based solutions.

Concerns are mounting globally and in Thailand over the growing impact of social media on youth mental health, as the latest research warns of increasing rates of depression, anxiety, and other psychological issues strongly linked to digital engagement. Amid calls for regulatory interventions, parental vigilance, and enhanced media literacy, the rising tide of evidence signals the need for urgent action to protect the well-being of the next generation.

The rapid rise in social media usage among children and teenagers is reshaping traditional childhood experiences while spawning new psychological risks. A recent press call by the Kids Code Coalition – highlighted in a KRCR News Channel 7 report – drew attention to mounting concerns, featuring advocates pushing for warning labels on social media platforms similar to those required for tobacco or alcohol. The coalition cited a surge in mental health crises coinciding with expanded social media use, particularly following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

A new wave of powerful artificial intelligence systems—from leading global tech companies like OpenAI, Google, and DeepSeek—are increasingly generating factual errors despite their advanced capabilities, sparking growing concerns among users, researchers, and businesses worldwide. As these A.I. bots become more capable at tasks like complex reasoning and mathematics, their tendency to produce incorrect or entirely fabricated information—known as “hallucinations”—is not only persisting but actually worsening, as revealed in a recent investigative report by The New York Times (nytimes.com).

The Kalama Sutta, or “กาลามสูตร” in Thai, stands as one of the most influential teachings by the Buddha, known for encouraging people not to blindly believe in information or beliefs without thoughtful consideration. For Thai high school students growing up in a world of overwhelming information—on social media, in the classroom, and from peers—understanding the Kalama Sutta is both empowering and essential.

Why does this ancient Buddhist principle remain relevant in modern Thailand? At its heart, the Kalama Sutta (as explained in sources such as Wikipedia and multiple other Thai dharma platforms) teaches us how to think, not what to think. The Buddha gave this teaching to the Kalama people, who were confused by contradictory spiritual teachers. Participating youth of the time wondered: “Whom should we believe?”

A recent revelation that researchers from the University of Zurich secretly infiltrated a major Reddit discussion forum with AI bots has sparked global outrage and renewed concerns over the ethical boundaries of artificial intelligence in online communities. The covert experiment, carried out on the subreddit r/changemyview, has prompted Reddit leadership to consider legal action, while community members and digital rights advocates warn of broader implications for public trust in digital interactions (NBC News).

A recent spotlight on children’s body image, highlighted by The Guardian’s feature “‘Mummy, Charlie called me fat today’: how to talk to kids about body image,” has reignited concern about how body shaming affects youngsters’ self-esteem worldwide—including here in Thailand. As schoolyard taunts become increasingly common and social media deepens pressure on appearance, experts stress that how adults respond can have profound implications for a child’s mental health and future relationship with their body.

Hollywood actor Penn Badgley’s recent disclosure about his struggle with body dysmorphia has resonated widely, igniting crucial conversations about mental health, celebrity culture, and the influence of media on self-image both in the West and here in Thailand. In a heartfelt interview with The Guardian, Badgley—best known for his roles in “Gossip Girl” and “You”—shared, “I know that I hated my body and simply wanted a different one…I was jumping wilfully into, but also being thrust into, this world where the more conventionally beautiful I seemed, the more successful I might be, the more value I might have” (The Guardian). His frank admission has sparked international attention, highlighting the often-hidden torment experienced by people living with body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) and underscoring the urgent need for public awareness and intervention—especially in visually oriented societies.