#Personality

A global study identifies six core traits that define “cool,” cutting across cultures and countries, including Thailand. Researchers say extroversion, hedonism, power, adventurousness, openness to experience, and autonomy shape how young people experience media, trends, and social life in Thai schools and communities. The findings offer fresh insight into how global exchange influences Thai youth, education, and culture.

The appeal of being cool has long influenced friendships, fashion, and status. A cross-country team surveyed nearly 6,000 adults in 13 nations, asking them to rate others as “cool,” “uncool,” “good,” or “not good.” Across Bangkok, Berlin, and Lagos, a similar profile emerged: energetic social presence, pleasure-seeking, influence, risk-taking, openness, and independence.

Psychologists have finally cracked the code on what it means to be “cool”—and it turns out, the definition is strikingly universal. New research involving diverse participants from around the globe has identified six core personality traits that make someone universally perceived as cool: extraversion, hedonism, power, adventurousness, openness, and autonomy. This breakthrough challenges the idea that coolness is purely cultural or subjective and provides new insights into how these attributes transcend borders and societies (New York Post, The New York Times).

A global study identifies six core traits consistently linked to being seen as cool, regardless of culture. Extraversion, hedonism, power, adventurousness, openness, and autonomy emerge as universal indicators of coolness. The findings challenge the idea that style alone defines cool and suggest personality plays a central role in social perception—an insight highly relevant to Thai youth where image and social standing carry weight.

Researchers emphasize that understanding what makes someone cool goes beyond trends. The implications extend to friendships, group formation, and how audiences interpret influencers in media and society. In Thailand, where social judgments influence youth culture, branding, and education, these universal traits may shape how personalities are developed and presented.

A recent study from the University of Barcelona shows that everyday language can help detect personality traits and that AI models can explain how they reach these conclusions. Using integrated gradients, researchers make the decision process of AI personality assessments more transparent. The work, published in PLOS ONE, could influence how personality is measured in fields like clinical psychology, education, and human resources.

For Thai audiences, the timing is timely. Southeast Asia is rapidly adopting digital tools, including AI, in schools, universities, and workplaces in Bangkok and beyond. Language-based personality assessments could support student counseling, recruitment, and personalized learning. However, ethical considerations must accompany these advances as Thailand explores AI-enabled solutions.

A groundbreaking study led by researchers at the University of Barcelona has harnessed artificial intelligence (AI) to reveal how everyday language can be used to detect personality traits, while also making key inroads into understanding how such AI models make their decisions. Using advanced machine learning techniques and a transparent, explainable AI approach known as “integrated gradients,” the research demystifies the inner workings of AI personality assessments. Their findings, recently published in PLOS ONE, could transform how personality is measured and ethically deployed across fields ranging from clinical psychology to education and human resources (source).

A major study published in a respected science journal maps where people with so-called “dark” personality traits—such as psychopathy, narcissism, and everyday sadism—are most likely to live. The research ties these traits to broader social factors like poverty, inequality, and violence. Data drawn from millions of individuals across many countries show how environment and society can influence personality development, offering new guidance for policymakers and health professionals alike.

The project, led by a team including a prominent personality psychologist from a leading European university, goes beyond sensational depictions of deviant traits. It highlights the real-world conditions where dark personalities tend to cluster and how policies addressing social gaps may reduce these patterns over time.

A striking new study published in PNAS has mapped where people with so-called “dark” personality traits—such as psychopathy, narcissism, and everyday sadism—are most likely to reside, linking these traits to broader social conditions such as poverty, inequality, and violence. The findings, drawn from multiple datasets and encompassing 1.8 million individuals across 183 countries and 144,000 participants in the United States, offer new insights into how environment and society can shape individual psychology (NewsNationNow).

A global study analyzing nearly 2 million people across 183 countries shows that societies plagued by corruption, inequality, poverty, and violence are more likely to develop “dark” personality traits—psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism. The findings suggest that the environment people grow up in helps mold behavior that affects communities, governments, and social trust. Research from the University of Copenhagen and colleagues indicates that social adversity is a strong predictor of selfish, aggressive, and exploitative tendencies, with important implications for policy and Thai society.

A sweeping new global study shows that people living in societies plagued by corruption, inequality, poverty, and violence are significantly more likely to develop what psychologists term “dark” personality traits, including psychopathy, narcissism, and machiavellianism—a finding with profound implications for social policy and Thai society. Researchers from the University of Copenhagen, analyzing data from nearly 2 million individuals across 183 countries, report that social adversity is a strong predictor of psychological tendencies towards selfishness, aggression, and exploitation, raising key questions about how governance and environment shape the character of entire populations (Phys.org, news.ku.dk).

New research highlights the lasting impact of childhood social rejection on mental wellbeing and personality development. Findings show that early exclusion increases loneliness and is associated with higher levels of the Dark Triad—narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. The study’s implications are relevant to educators, parents, and policymakers in Thailand, where social harmony and community integration are highly valued.

In Thai communities, where group belonging and collective well-being shape childhood experiences, social exclusion can carry heavy consequences. International research indicates that marginalized children—whether due to academics, disabilities, or family background—face greater risks of chronic loneliness. The study also suggests that early exclusion can contribute to traits marked by manipulation, grandiosity, and a lack of empathy. Researchers noted that individuals who faced rejection in childhood reported higher loneliness and more pronounced Dark Triad characteristics as adults.

Early experiences of social exclusion may have far-reaching consequences on individuals’ psychological wellbeing and future personality development, according to new research reported by PsyPost. The study, which investigates the knock-on effects of childhood social rejection, reveals that not only does exclusion increase loneliness, but it is also linked to a rise in characteristics known collectively as the “Dark Triad”: narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. These findings could have significant implications for educators, parents, and policymakers in Thailand, where social harmony and group integration are held in high cultural regard.

A new study shows that delaying bedtime is more about emotional well-being and personality traits than simply poor time management. The findings offer fresh guidance for Thai readers facing late nights in a bustling urban environment like Bangkok, and a national sleep deficit that affects health, education, and productivity.

In Bangkok and other Thai cities, late-night study, work, and socializing contribute to an ongoing sleep shortage. Data from Thailand’s National Statistical Office indicate that urban residents frequently do not get enough sleep, with potential implications for mental health and academic performance. This research provides a broader lens on why sleep can be elusive in fast-paced Thai life.

A recent study in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology suggests that people who cheat once are more likely to cheat again. This challenges the idea that cheating is just a one-time lapse. The finding has implications for everyday life and raises questions about trust in Thai personal and professional relationships.

Researchers tracked nearly 2,000 participants over three years using controlled games designed to measure dishonest behavior. In one exercise, participants wrote a number from one to eight. After being shown a random number, they answered whether their number matched the display. A small cash reward was offered for a match, and participants were told their answers would not be double-checked, creating an environment where lying had no immediate consequences. The study indicates that cheating persisted across different scenarios, suggesting a stable trait rather than situational opportunism.

A newly published study from the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology is making waves by suggesting that individuals who cheat once are significantly more likely to repeat their dishonest behaviour—contradicting the longstanding belief that cheating is merely a one-time error in judgment rather than a trait embedded in a person’s character. This finding has important implications for understanding dishonesty in everyday life and raises new questions for Thai readers about how trust and integrity function in both personal and professional relationships.

A new study reveals that procrastinating bedtime—a common struggle for many young adults—may be shaped more by underlying emotional health and personality traits than by simple poor time management, offering fresh insights for those in Thailand grappling with late nights and insufficient sleep. The research, set to be presented at the SLEEP 2025 annual meeting, highlights higher levels of neuroticism and lower levels of conscientiousness and extraversion among individuals who routinely delay going to bed even without external obligations, findings that suggest new directions for sleep-related interventions and wellness strategies (Neuroscience News).

A new personality type is making waves in the world of child psychology: the ‘otrovert’. Recently introduced by psychiatrist Dr. Rami Kaminski in his latest book, “The Gift of Not Belonging,” the otrovert describes children who thrive in one-on-one interactions but feel alienated or uncomfortable in larger groups—a concept distinct from the more familiar categories of introversion and extroversion. As parents and educators in Thailand continue to seek a better understanding of children’s social needs, this new research sheds light on how some children may chart their own unique path through social development.

A new child psychology concept, the “otrovert,” is drawing attention as researchers describe kids who thrive in one-on-one settings but feel uncomfortable in larger groups. Dr. Rami Kaminski introduced the term in his latest book, The Gift of Not Belonging, to highlight a personality style distinct from traditional labels like introversion and extroversion. For Thai families, this offers fresh insight into children’s social needs and how best to support their growth in school and community life.

A recent study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology indicates that individuals who cheat once are more likely to cheat again years later. The research argues that dishonesty may reflect a lasting personality tendency rather than a purely situational lapse, with implications for relationships, classrooms, and workplaces in Thailand, a society that values trust and integrity.

Trust is central in Thai life, from marriages to classrooms and business deals. The question of whether “once a cheater, always a cheater” resonates beyond theory into everyday life is both personal and cultural. Thai readers are familiar with stories of betrayal in various settings, prompting debates about whether such acts are momentary mistakes or enduring patterns. The study provides comprehensive data that can inform these conversations.

A groundbreaking new study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology has found that individuals who cheat once are highly likely to cheat again, even years later. This wide-ranging investigation challenges the notion that dishonesty is merely situational, instead suggesting that for many, the tendency to cheat is a persistent personality trait. The findings have significant implications for relationships, education, and workplace ethics in Thailand, a society that values trust and integrity.

A new study suggests that frequent conflicts, such as arguments and emotional outbursts, may explain why individuals who score high in neuroticism tend to feel less satisfied in their romantic relationships. The research, published in Sexual and Relationship Therapy, unveils behavioral patterns that could be especially relevant for couples in Thailand seeking to strengthen their partnerships or understand why tensions sometimes run high (PsyPost).

Neuroticism, one of the Big Five personality traits studied worldwide, refers to a tendency to experience strong negative emotions—including anxiety, sadness, irritability, and emotional instability. While deeply influenced by genetics and early life experiences, this trait is not entirely unchangeable. Thai readers may be familiar with the trait as “hua jai wawn” in popular culture, describing people who are quick to be upset or easily distressed. International studies have long linked high neuroticism to poorer relationship outcomes, but the new research adds clarity by showing that it’s not just the emotional temperament itself but the tendency to engage in conflict-fueled behaviors that erode relationship satisfaction.

Could a person’s face betray their darkest personality traits? A recent study featured in international news coverage, including a widely read article on Newsweek, has sparked lively debate with the claim that psychopathy and other so-called “dark triad” traits—narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy—can indeed be detected from someone’s facial appearance alone. Drawing insights from the latest scientific advances, the study challenges traditional notions about whether people can reliably spot dangerous or manipulative individuals by their looks—a topic with major implications for Thai society, given the importance placed on first impressions, face, and social harmony.

A new study claims that facial appearance can hint at dark personality traits such as narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Coverage abroad, including a widely read article in Newsweek, has sparked debate about whether we can reliably judge dangerous or manipulative behavior from looks. For Thai readers, the topic intersects with local values around first impressions, social harmony, and reputation.

The study centers on the “dark triad” traits, which researchers link to antisocial behavior, manipulation, and reduced empathy. While psychology often treats these traits as measurable parts of personality, the idea that facial features alone reveal such traits raises questions about bias, fairness, and accuracy in everyday judgments. In Thailand, where face value and social etiquette influence interactions at work and in communities, the findings invite careful consideration rather than quick conclusions.

A surge of new research is challenging long-held beliefs about how parenting shapes us as adults. In his book, Rethinking Psychology: Finding Meaning in Misconceptions, renowned psychologist Michael W. Eysenck highlights that genetics may play a larger role in adult personality than parenting styles. The Times of India outlines these findings, signaling important conversations for Thai families and educators accustomed to linking nurture with lifelong temperament and mental health.

In Thai culture, parenting often centers on discipline, moral guidance, and constant presence, values reinforced in homes, schools, and Buddhist temples. Eysenck’s synthesis draws on international studies to suggest that genetic inheritance accounts for a greater share of adult personality differences than previously recognized. While parental love and guidance remain essential for security and social skills, core traits such as extraversion, emotional stability, and openness may be rooted more in DNA than in parenting methods.

A wave of new research is overturning long-held beliefs about the power of parenting in shaping who we become as adults, with renowned psychologist Michael W. Eysenck’s latest book, “Rethinking Psychology: Finding Meaning in Misconceptions,” spotlighting the ways genetics, more than parenting styles, influence adult personalities. The findings, detailed in a recent report by the Times of India, are likely to spark important conversations in Thai families and among educators who have long assumed nurturing—rather than nature—was the primary driver of children’s lifelong temperaments and mental health Times of India.