#Praise

Recent headlines have ignited a lively debate among educators, psychologists, and parents about a long-repeated phrase: “good job.” Emerging research, prominent opinion columns like the recent Globe and Mail feature, and expert commentary are challenging the effectiveness—and even appropriateness—of generic praise in child development. As the school year draws to a close in Thailand, understanding the science behind praise has practical implications for teachers, parents, and policymakers seeking to nurture resilient, self-motivated youth.

A growing debate among educators, psychologists, and parents questions the value of generic praise like “good job.” New findings and thoughtful commentary suggest that how praise is delivered matters as much as if it is given. As Thailand’s school year ends, understanding these ideas can help teachers, parents, and policymakers support resilient, motivated students.

In Thailand, phrases such as “ทำดีมาก” (tham dee mak – “good job”) are common in classrooms and homes. They carry cultural weight in a society that highly values achievement and family harmony. Yet recent research indicates that blanket praise may not be the most effective way to foster long-term growth or intrinsic motivation.