#Redmeat

A new review published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition has reignited an ongoing debate over the health risks of red meat, revealing that who pays for the research may significantly influence its conclusions. The review, led by researchers at Francisco de Vitoria University in Spain, found that studies funded by the red meat industry are nearly four times as likely to report favorable or neutral cardiovascular outcomes compared to independently funded counterparts—a trend that raises urgent questions about scientific impartiality and consumer trust in dietary guidance (nytimes.com).

A fresh review in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition questions how funding sources may shape conclusions in red meat research. Led by researchers from Francisco de Vitoria University in Spain, the study found that industry-funded trials are nearly four times more likely to report favorable or neutral heart-related outcomes than independently funded studies. The findings raise important considerations about scientific integrity and how dietary guidance reaches readers and patients.