#Socialharmony

Recent scientific work is unpacking the psychology behind extremist beliefs, highlighting markers that may shape how people think ideologically. Research discussed by experts identifies four key traits linked to extremist thinking: cognitive rigidity, emotional volatility, variations in brain structure (notably the amygdala), and differences in the prefrontal cortex. Data from international studies suggest these factors interact with life experiences to influence belief formation.

For Thai readers, these insights are especially relevant as society navigates charged political, cultural, and generational debates. Understanding underlying factors is not just academic; it informs how educators, mental health professionals, parents, and policymakers in Thailand approach prevention and resilience-building. Thai culture places high value on social harmony and respect for diversity, which can guide practical responses.

A new wave of scientific research is shedding light on the psychological and neurobiological roots of ideological extremism, revealing that certain mental traits may make people more susceptible to radical beliefs. According to recent findings discussed in Big Think, renowned researcher Dr. Leor Zmigrod, author of the book “The Ideological Brain,” has identified four principal psychological markers that correlate closely with extremist ideologies: cognitive rigidity, emotional volatility, differences in the amygdala, and structural traits within the prefrontal cortex.

A groundbreaking neuroscience study has discovered that our awareness of internal body sensations—sometimes described as “gut feelings”—can significantly guide our moral decisions, often aligning them with group norms and social expectations. The new research, published in The Journal of Neuroscience, reveals that people who are more attuned to their bodily signals are more likely to make moral choices consistent with the majority’s views, offering fresh insight into how morality is shaped by both brain and body, and not merely by abstract reasoning or peer pressure (PsyPost).

A new neuroscience study finds that awareness of internal bodily signals, often called gut feelings, can influence moral decisions to align with social norms. Researchers report that people who are more attuned to their bodily states tend to make moral choices that reflect the majority, especially in ambiguous situations. The findings offer a fresh view on how brain and body together shape morality, beyond pure reasoning or peer pressure.

Thai readers will recognize the relevance: morality and social harmony are central in Thai life, where community consensus and avoiding conflict are highly valued. Concepts such as jai yen (cool-heartedness) and samruam (social restraint) echo the study’s message that internal bodily cues can help individuals align with group values. In a Buddhist-majority country, this links traditional mindfulness practices with emerging science on interoception, or perceiving internal bodily states.