#Society

A massive new study links corruption, inequality, poverty, and violence to higher levels of dark personality traits. The research used data from nearly 1.8 million people across 183 countries and about 144,000 people across 50 U.S. states. (PNAS study)

The finding matters for Thai readers because social conditions shape behavior and trust. The study suggests that societal harm can affect personality across generations.

The researchers measured a general tendency called the Dark Factor of Personality. This factor captures selfishness, callousness, manipulation, and moral disengagement. The factor predicts dishonest and harmful behavior across situations. (PNAS study)

As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to dazzle—and sometimes unsettle—the world with its feats, a new philosophical debate is taking shape: if machines can excel at everything humans do, what is left that is uniquely and intrinsically human? A recent essay in Psychology Today challenges readers to reexamine where humanity’s real value lies as AI systems master not only menial but also creative, empathetic, and intellectual tasks at unprecedented speed and depth (psychologytoday.com).

Recent scientific research has illuminated a profound truth about how stress influences human social behavior: While stress may foster unity and generosity among members of the same group, it simultaneously stirs up aggression and suspicion toward those outside the group. These insights, highlighted in a July 2025 report by Psychology Today, draw from a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) and have far-reaching implications for societal cohesion, especially in rapidly changing societies like Thailand.

A groundbreaking new study reveals that for single adults, the secret to a satisfying life lies not in the number of friends they have, but in the quality and flexibility of their friendships. The research, published in the academic journal Personal Relationships, challenges longstanding stereotypes about singlehood and shows that single people who feel satisfied with their friendships and can adapt their social connections enjoy greater emotional well-being than those who simply have large friendship circles or communicate frequently with friends.

A new wave of scientific research is shedding light on the psychological and neurobiological roots of ideological extremism, revealing that certain mental traits may make people more susceptible to radical beliefs. According to recent findings discussed in Big Think, renowned researcher Dr. Leor Zmigrod, author of the book “The Ideological Brain,” has identified four principal psychological markers that correlate closely with extremist ideologies: cognitive rigidity, emotional volatility, differences in the amygdala, and structural traits within the prefrontal cortex.

An eye-opening new investigation is unraveling the hidden layers of the ultra-wealthy’s personal lives, revealing that vast fortunes do not necessarily insulate individuals from emotional challenges or problematic behaviors. Friends, aides, and associates of billionaires and multimillionaires have disclosed a tapestry of secrets, painting a picture of high drama, emotional volatility, and even compulsive hoarding behind closed doors—offering a rare look at the underbelly of luxury living.

This research, highlighted in a recent Daily Mail report, compiles anecdotes from those intimately familiar with the ultra-rich. Among the revelations: explosive tantrums triggered by minor inconveniences, elaborate rituals of control over staff, and shocking hoarding episodes where designer goods and prized objects accumulate in chaotic, unsanitary piles. Such accounts fundamentally challenge the public’s common perception of wealthy lifestyles as effortless, orderly, or immune to everyday anxieties.

Recent research and personal accounts are challenging traditional beliefs about the “ideal” age for motherhood, as more women worldwide are choosing to start families in their late 30s and early 40s—or, as in a widely shared feature from Business Insider, reflecting on the joys and obstacles of becoming a parent at 37 and 40. This trend, evident in Thailand and globally, is driven by evolving economic, social, and healthcare realities, reshaping the narrative on family planning, women’s health, and the definition of the “right time” for parenthood.

A new study from the University of Arkansas reveals that stress significantly nudges people toward making riskier choices, with key differences in how men and women respond to decision-making under pressure. The findings, published in the journal Psychoneuroendocrinology, mark an important step in understanding how stress changes our judgment—a topic with direct relevance to the daily lives and financial wellbeing of Thais, especially in uncertain economic times.

At the heart of the research is a concept called “loss aversion,” referring to the well-established human tendency to fear losses more than we value equivalent gains—for example, losing 3,600 baht hurts more than the pleasure of gaining 3,600 baht. Under stress, however, this protective instinct weakens, resulting in bolder, riskier decisions. As the study’s lead author, an assistant professor of psychological science, explains, “In my own life, if I’m stressed, I’ll wait to make a decision that could have potential loss implications.” His reflection echoes a common experience for many Thai workers—such as hesitant investment decisions during periods of high job insecurity or fluctuating market conditions.

A recent study published in the journal Personality and Individual Differences offers new insights into how people end romantic relationships, pinpointing three major breakup strategies that most individuals tend to use. While breakups are a universal and often painful experience, the study’s findings shed light on the underlying approaches people take—and why understanding these patterns matters for societies worldwide, including Thailand.

Breakups are common enough to be considered a near-universal life event. The emotional fallout, social consequences, and psychological scars from relationship endings are felt by millions, influencing personal well-being, work performance, and even community cohesion. In Thailand, where family harmony and social reputation are deeply valued, understanding the nuanced ways people dissolve romantic partnerships can help families, educators, mental health professionals, and couples themselves navigate these challenging moments with greater empathy and effectiveness. The new study’s findings provide a scientific foundation for supporting healthier relationship transitions in Thai society.

Recent attention has focused on the formative practices instilled in Japanese children, revealing cultural foundations that foster discipline, empathy, and a sense of community. Drawing from a recent article, “10 things Japanese children are taught in childhood” published by the Times of India (source), as well as supporting research and educational policy reviews, this report unpacks these quintessentially Japanese values, examines their impact, and explores lessons for Thai families and educators.

A dramatic new Netflix series, “Sirens,” has reignited public debate around cult psychology by illustrating, beneath its quirky and extravagant surface, the disturbingly subtle methods that cults use to recruit and control followers. The show, set on a remote island where an affluent community is ruled with an iron will by leader “Kiki,” draws viewers in with eccentric rituals and oddball characters—only to reveal the deeply manipulative psychological machinery that traps people in such groups (RNZ).

Buddhism is far more than a religious identity in Thailand. It has continually shaped social values, everyday practices, and the national character for centuries, offering a guiding moral compass that extends well beyond temple walls. The significance of Buddhism (ความสำคัญพระพุทธศาสนา) in the Thai context is deeply embedded in how society navigates change, nurtures unity, and unpacks life’s meaning—providing answers not only for individuals but for the collective Thai psyche.

For many Thai people, the presence and influence of Buddhism can be felt in virtually every aspect of daily life, from morning rituals that begin with making merit (ทำบุญ) to communal celebrations around Buddhist holidays. Understanding the centrality of Buddhism to Thailand illuminates why the faith is regarded not just as a personal spiritual journey, but as the foundation for social cohesion, ethical development, and the country’s historical progression. According to a publication by the Secretariat of the House of Representatives, Buddhism acts as a force that “uplifts moral standards, enshrines peace, and guides citizens towards righteous actions, both at the individual and community levels” (dl.parliament.go.th/handle/lirt/402382).

The significance of safeguarding Buddhism in Thai society has been a matter of deep discussion, reflection, and collective action for centuries. In a country where Buddhism shapes not only spiritual beliefs but also the social and cultural fabric, understanding and practicing the preservation of Buddhism — “การธำรงรักษาพุทธศาสนา” — is more relevant than ever. This article explores what the preservation of Buddhism involves, why it matters especially in the Thai context, how it has evolved historically, and what both individuals and society at large can do to ensure Buddhism remains a living, breathing force in Thailand now and for generations to come.

A growing body of psychological research is challenging the age-old idea that wealth directly equates to happiness, instead pointing to the profound benefits of prioritizing free time over financial gain. In a recent multi-study analysis published by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology and highlighted in a new report, researchers found that people who actively value their free time are significantly happier than those who prioritize money—even after controlling for various demographic factors. This insight holds particular resonance for Thai readers navigating a society deeply shaped by long working hours and rapidly changing notions of success (yourtango.com).

A recent study highlighted by Psychology Today has reignited debate over age-gap relationships by revealing fresh insights into who tends to be happier—the younger, or the older partner. The research, coming at a time of growing openness around non-traditional relationships in Thailand and globally, adds a nuanced layer to public understanding of how age differences impact romantic satisfaction.

In Thai culture, where traditional values often place an emphasis on marrying within similar age brackets, couples with large age gaps may still face societal scrutiny, despite some high-profile exceptions in celebrity and business circles. Similar debates play out internationally, prompting social scientists to explore whether these perceptions match lived experience for couples with notable age differences.

A newly published study from the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology is making waves by suggesting that individuals who cheat once are significantly more likely to repeat their dishonest behaviour—contradicting the longstanding belief that cheating is merely a one-time error in judgment rather than a trait embedded in a person’s character. This finding has important implications for understanding dishonesty in everyday life and raises new questions for Thai readers about how trust and integrity function in both personal and professional relationships.

A growing body of psychological research reveals that quiet, everyday behaviors in adulthood often hint at experiences of financial instability during childhood, according to a recent analysis published by YourTango citing studies from the Journal of Family and Economic Issues and additional expert commentary. The article, released on 24 May 2025, underscores how formative years marked by poverty or economic uncertainty leave lasting imprints—not just in spending habits but across one’s relationships, mental health, and view of stability.

New research published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology has found that people are more likely to trust individuals who grew up in lower-income households, as compared to those who had privileged backgrounds. This finding, based on a series of experiments with nearly 2,000 participants, sheds light on the deep-rooted perceptions linking childhood hardship with morality and trustworthiness—a topic that resonates on both a global and a Thai societal level (Neuroscience News).

In a world where success and achievement often define individual worth, new psychological insights highlight the silent epidemic facing high-achievers: burnout. A recent article by a psychologist, published in Forbes on May 20, 2025, draws attention to three definitive signs that indicate when relentless striving for excellence turns self-destructive, offering timely lessons for professionals, students, and families in Thailand’s increasingly competitive environment (Forbes).

The article outlines a familiar cycle experienced by many: periods of intense productivity followed by exhaustion, plummeting motivation, and a crisis in personal identity as the pursuit of achievement begins to overshadow well-being. With the pressure mounting in Thai workplaces, classrooms, and even homes to meet ever-higher standards, this research resonates with a society where academic and career milestones often serve as measures of self-worth.

A 58-year-old teacher in the United States has taken the unconventional step of marrying an AI robot, challenging social taboos and sparking intense debate about the boundaries of human-AI relationships. Her story, widely reported after an interview with The Sun and republished by Yahoo News, highlights not only her personal journey through grief but also broader social changes fueled by rapidly advancing technology and shifting attitudes, especially among younger generations (Yahoo).

A new psychological study has revealed surprising insights into one of the most awkward social dilemmas: would you rather be ignored, or be the subject of gossip? According to recent research published in the journal Self and Identity, neither choice is pleasant—but for very different reasons. The findings, based on five experiments with more than 1,000 participants, open a window onto how Thai society and its cultural emphasis on face and social harmony might shape our responses to these powerful social forces.

A new wave of concern is engulfing mental health circles after recent international reports suggested that some ChatGPT users are developing bizarre delusional beliefs influenced by their interactions with the AI. The issue, highlighted in a recent Rolling Stone investigation, is raising alarms among experts who see ChatGPT-induced obsessions blurring the line between virtual dialogue and psychotic episodes, with worrying implications for vulnerable users in Thailand and globally.

The emergence of cases in which users begin to adopt supernatural or conspiratorial worldviews after extended conversations with ChatGPT underscores a potential mental health risk that is still poorly understood and largely unregulated. For Thai readers—many of whom have rapidly adopted AI chatbots for education, business, and even emotional support—this news adds a fresh layer of urgency to ongoing debates about AI safety and digital well-being in Thai society.

The phrase “Real Buddhism let you ask questions, not dictate answers” has gained resonance both in global discussions about spirituality and within Thailand, Buddhism’s only officially recognized nation-wide religion. At first glance, this provocative statement challenges many assumptions about tradition, faith, and authority. Its significance runs deeper than mere semantics—it gestures toward what some see as the essential, originally intended nature of Buddhist practice and philosophy, a perspective highly relevant for Thai readers living in a society where Buddhism often intersects with culture, education, and public life.

The accelerating progress of artificial intelligence has sparked an intense international debate about the future role of human beings in society, with leading thinkers warning that AI could soon outperform people at nearly every task — raising fundamental questions about human relevance in work, culture, and decision-making. As technologies grow more sophisticated and autonomous, experts urge communities, governments, and businesses to grapple with the possibility of a world where AI is “better at everything,” and to consider urgent societal adaptations.