#Society

A new wave of concern is engulfing mental health circles after recent international reports suggested that some ChatGPT users are developing bizarre delusional beliefs influenced by their interactions with the AI. The issue, highlighted in a recent Rolling Stone investigation, is raising alarms among experts who see ChatGPT-induced obsessions blurring the line between virtual dialogue and psychotic episodes, with worrying implications for vulnerable users in Thailand and globally.

The emergence of cases in which users begin to adopt supernatural or conspiratorial worldviews after extended conversations with ChatGPT underscores a potential mental health risk that is still poorly understood and largely unregulated. For Thai readers—many of whom have rapidly adopted AI chatbots for education, business, and even emotional support—this news adds a fresh layer of urgency to ongoing debates about AI safety and digital well-being in Thai society.

The phrase “Real Buddhism let you ask questions, not dictate answers” has gained resonance both in global discussions about spirituality and within Thailand, Buddhism’s only officially recognized nation-wide religion. At first glance, this provocative statement challenges many assumptions about tradition, faith, and authority. Its significance runs deeper than mere semantics—it gestures toward what some see as the essential, originally intended nature of Buddhist practice and philosophy, a perspective highly relevant for Thai readers living in a society where Buddhism often intersects with culture, education, and public life.

The claim that “Real Buddhism lets you ask questions, not dictate answers” has gained traction worldwide and resonates deeply in Thailand, where Buddhism is the national faith. The statement challenges assumptions about tradition, authority, and belief. It points to an authentic spirit of Buddhist practice—one that Thai readers recognize in a society where faith intersects with education, culture, and public life.

To understand the idea, we should look to the Buddha’s era, when inquiry was welcomed. Buddhist texts show a different approach from many faiths that emphasize fixed doctrine. The Kalama Sutta, cited by Thai teachers, records the Buddha advising a village audience: do not rely on hearsay, tradition, or scripture alone. Instead, test and verify what is wholesome for yourself. A Bangkok Dhamma teacher notes that Buddhism invites doubt, experimentation, and direct experience—never blind faith. Seen this way, real Buddhism becomes a journey of inquiry and discovery.

The accelerating progress of artificial intelligence has sparked an intense international debate about the future role of human beings in society, with leading thinkers warning that AI could soon outperform people at nearly every task — raising fundamental questions about human relevance in work, culture, and decision-making. As technologies grow more sophisticated and autonomous, experts urge communities, governments, and businesses to grapple with the possibility of a world where AI is “better at everything,” and to consider urgent societal adaptations.

As artificial intelligence reshapes work, learning, and everyday life, a notable segment in Thailand questions or limits its adoption. AI tools, from chat assistants to smart recommendations, are increasingly influential. Yet many Thai readers see value in preserving human creativity, mindful energy use, and genuine social connections. This perspective reflects broader concerns about automation’s impact on jobs and culture, and how technology fits Thailand’s unique society.

Global momentum around AI is clear. Generative AI now attracts billions of monthly interactions, signaling a rapid shift in how people access information and craft content. For Thailand, the reach of digital technology—from Bangkok’s smart-city ambitions to remote-commerce—means AI is familiar but carries distinctive implications for local livelihoods and daily life.

In an era where artificial intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT and their rivals are reshaping the workplace, education, and even leisure activities, a notable segment of individuals are actively choosing to resist – or at least question – this digital transformation. As AI becomes an invisible hand guiding everything from web searches to music recommendations, the reluctance to embrace it reflects deeper concerns about human creativity, environmental costs, and the fabric of genuine social connection BBC News.

The ongoing debate about the nutritional value and social implications of baby food pouches has taken on renewed urgency following recent research by the University of Leeds, which revealed that 41% of main meals marketed for children contain excessive sugar, while 21% of ready-to-eat products are deemed too watery to provide adequate nutrition (The Guardian). While some public health advocates warn about rising childhood obesity and tooth decay linked to ultra-processed foods (UPFs), others argue that the conversation is often weaponised to intensify “maternal guilt” rather than meaningfully address broader issues affecting parents’ lives.

Confirmation bias, a deeply rooted psychological phenomenon, explains why we tend to focus on information that agrees with our pre-existing beliefs and ignore or discredit evidence that challenges them. In everyday life, this invisible force shapes not only our individual decisions but also the way Thai society interprets news, politics, and even the stories we tell ourselves about our health and well-being. The significance of understanding confirmation bias is becoming increasingly clear in an era where information is abundant but polarization is rising, both globally and in Thailand.

Confirmation bias makes people seek and remember information that fits their preconceptions, while discounting evidence that contradicts them. For Thai audiences, this invisible force shapes how we read health guidance, politics, and daily news in a crowded information landscape. Understanding it is crucial as Thailand embraces rapid digital change and growing polarization.

At a basic level, confirmation bias means we look for supporting evidence, interpret ambiguous data to fit our views, and recall memories that reinforce our beliefs. Decades of research show the brain prioritizes consistency over objective truth, influencing judgments in health, law, and public discourse. In fast-moving information environments, these tendencies can distort how we interpret new health advisories or political developments.

A renewed focus on baby food pouches highlights how nutrition, parenting demands, and social expectations intersect in modern life. Recent research from the University of Leeds found that 41% of main meals marketed for children contain high sugar, while 21% of ready-to-eat products may be too watery to provide adequate nutrition. Public health voices warn about links to childhood obesity and dental issues, but critics argue the discussion often targets mothers rather than addressing broader systemic challenges.

A growing body of research investigated in a recent article in The Atlantic challenges conventional wisdom about how boys should be raised, revealing that gendered parenting and cultural expectations may be holding back the emotional and developmental well-being of boys. These findings carry special significance for parents and educators in Thailand, where traditional models of masculinity often shape family and school life.

In societies around the world, including Thailand, the prevailing narrative says that boys must be tough, stoic, and emotionally restrained to succeed in life. This perspective, fueled by generations of social customs and amplified by contemporary social media influencers as well as political rhetoric, encourages boys to suppress feelings in favor of physical strength and competition. However, new studies suggest that such approaches run counter to boys’ actual developmental needs and may have long-term negative effects, not just for the boys themselves but for wider society as well.

A wave of recent research summarized in a major national publication questions long-held ideas about raising boys. The findings suggest that traditional expectations of male toughness and emotional restraint may hinder boys’ emotional health and overall development. For Thai parents and educators, the implications are significant as family life and schools continue to shape young people’s growth.

Globally, including Thailand, the prevailing view has been that boys must be strong, stoic, and less expressive to succeed. This mindset is reinforced by cultural norms, social media, and political rhetoric, which can lead boys to suppress feelings in favor of competition and achievement. New studies, however, indicate such approaches may misalign with boys’ developmental needs and could carry long-term costs for individuals and society.

A recent research study has revealed a fascinating psychological bias: while most individuals believe they are destined for good karma, they tend to expect that others will receive the opposite—bad karma. This counterintuitive finding, highlighted in a new article on CNN Health, offers profound insights into how beliefs in cosmic justice impact our perception of ourselves and those around us.

Karma, a concept rooted in Buddhist and Hindu traditions—and widely influential in Thai society—suggests that moral actions determine future consequences. The study’s results underline how this ancient belief manifests in modern attitudes, with significant psychological and social implications for communities shaped by Buddhist sensibilities like Thailand’s.

A new study reveals a curious psychological pattern: people often feel confident that they themselves will experience good karma, while expecting others to face bad karma. The finding offers insight into how beliefs about cosmic justice shape how Thai communities view morality, fault, and outcomes.

Karma, rooted in Buddhist and Hindu traditions and deeply influential in Thai culture, is often seen as a guide to conduct and future consequences. The study suggests that modern attitudes still reflect this ancient idea, with potential effects on how individuals relate to one another and respond to social events. According to researchers featured in the study, many people view their own actions through a forgiving lens, while predicting harsher consequences for those they deem morally wrong.

Gisele Bündchen, the globally renowned supermodel, is once again in the spotlight, but this time not for her runway achievements or high-profile campaigns. Instead, her recent transition into parenthood has prompted neighbors to speak out about what kind of presence she is within the local community. Following the birth of her newborn son, discussions among locals have drawn attention to Bündchen’s personality beyond her public persona and provided insights into how celebrity parents can influence their immediate environment.

Thai families are increasingly seeking names that convey warmth, optimism, and positive energy. A recent feature highlighting baby girl names meaning “sunshine” has sparked interest among Thai parents who want futures filled with brightness and hope for their daughters.

Names tied to sunshine carry rich symbolism across cultures. The sun is widely associated with life, vitality, and prosperity—qualities many Thai families hope to gift their children. In Thailand, where names are often chosen for auspicious meanings, a sunshine-linked name fits naturally with local traditions that emphasize virtue, prosperity, and beauty. The concept of light and radiance aligns well with Thai beliefs about auspicious beginnings.

Thai parents are increasingly seeking inspiration from global trends when it comes to naming their children, with a growing number looking for names that embody positive energy and optimism. A recent feature by The Times of India has highlighted a delightful trend: baby girl names that mean “sunshine,” sparking interest among parents worldwide, including in Thailand, who are searching for names symbolizing warmth, happiness, and hope for their daughters’ futures (Times of India).

A wave of research is reshaping the way we understand ideology—not just as a social or political phenomenon, but as a deeply rooted function of the human brain. A recent book by political neuroscientist Dr. Leor Zmigrod, “The Ideological Brain: The Radical Science of Flexible Thinking,” has captured global attention by revealing how our biological wiring underpins not only our convictions but also our openness—or resistance—to evidence and change (Nautilus, NY Times). Why does ideology “taste” so good to the mind, and what makes some of us more likely to become deeply entrenched, even to the point of dogma? The answers emerging from neuroscience offer insight for Thais grappling with political polarization and social change.